Standards Comparison

    DORA

    Mandatory
    2023

    EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector

    VS

    ISO 22000

    Voluntary
    2018

    International standard for food safety management systems

    Quick Verdict

    DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU financial entities against cyber threats, while ISO 22000 provides voluntary FSMS certification for global food chains to control hazards. Financial firms adopt DORA for regulatory compliance; food organizations seek ISO 22000 for market trust and safety assurance.

    Digital Operational Resilience

    DORA

    Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 Digital Operational Resilience Act

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Direct ESAs oversight of critical ICT third-party providers
    • Mandatory triennial threat-led penetration testing for critical entities
    • Standardized 4-hour initial reporting of major incidents
    • Comprehensive ICT risk management frameworks overseen by management
    • Harmonized resilience rules across 20 financial entity types
    Food Safety

    ISO 22000

    ISO 22000:2018 Food safety management systems

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Adopts High-Level Structure for integrated management systems
    • Two nested PDCA cycles for governance and operations
    • Integrates HACCP with PRPs, OPRPs, and CCPs
    • Risk-based hazard analysis and control planning
    • Interactive communication across food chain

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    DORA Details

    What It Is

    Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), formally Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is a transformative EU regulation enhancing digital operational resilience of the financial sector against ICT risks like cyberattacks and disruptions. Applicable to 20 financial entity types and critical ICT third-party providers (CTPPs), it employs a risk-based, proportional approach for harmonized oversight across 27 member states, entering full application January 17, 2025.

    Key Components

    Core pillars include ICT risk management frameworks for identifying and mitigating risks; incident reporting with 4-hour notifications, 72-hour updates; resilience testing via annual scans and triennial threat-led penetration testing (TLPT); and third-party oversight with due diligence, monitoring, and ESAs supervision. No formal certification, but enforced compliance via RTS/ITS, penalties up to 2% global turnover.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandatory for ~22,000 EU financial entities to meet legal obligations, mitigate systemic cyber threats (74% report ransomware), and manage third-party vulnerabilities as in 2024 CrowdStrike outage. Boosts resilience, stakeholder trust, and competitive edge through proactive strategies.

    Implementation Overview

    Conduct gap analyses, develop frameworks, implement testing/tools, assess vendors per proportionality. Targets all sizes in EU finance; involves training, audits, reporting. Preparation since 2023, with Batch 1/2 standards in 2024 guiding multi-year rollout.

    ISO 22000 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 22000:2018 is the international standard specifying requirements for a Food Safety Management System (FSMS). It applies to any organization in the food chain, using a risk-based approach integrating HACCP principles with management system discipline via the High-Level Structure (HLS).

    Key Components

    • **Clauses 4-10Context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
    • Core elements: PRPs, hazard analysis, CCPs/OPRPs, traceability, verification, two PDCA cycles.
    • Built on Codex HACCP and HLS for certifiable compliance.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Ensures safe food delivery, meets regulations/customer needs.
    • Manages risks, enables market access (e.g., GFSI schemes).
    • Builds trust, integrates with ISO 9001/14001, reduces recalls.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, PRPs, hazard control plan, training, audits.
    • Scalable for all sizes/industries in food chain globally.
    • Certification via accredited bodies: stage 1/2 audits, annual surveillance.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    DORA
    Digital operational resilience against ICT disruptions
    ISO 22000
    Food safety management systems and hazard control

    Industry

    DORA
    EU financial sector and critical ICT providers
    ISO 22000
    Global food chain organizations all sizes

    Nature

    DORA
    Mandatory EU regulation with enforcement
    ISO 22000
    Voluntary international certification standard

    Testing

    DORA
    Annual basic tests, triennial TLPT by authorities
    ISO 22000
    Internal audits, management reviews, verification

    Penalties

    DORA
    Up to 2% global turnover fines
    ISO 22000
    Loss of certification, no legal penalties

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about DORA and ISO 22000

    DORA FAQ

    ISO 22000 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages