DORA
EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector
ISO 27018
Code of practice for PII protection in public clouds.
Quick Verdict
DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU financial firms via risk management and testing, while ISO 27018 provides voluntary cloud PII controls extending ISO 27001. Financial entities adopt DORA for legal compliance; cloud providers use ISO 27018 for trust and procurement edge.
DORA
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (Digital Operational Resilience Act)
Key Features
- Direct ESAs supervision of critical third-party ICT providers
- Triennial threat-led penetration testing for critical entities
- 4-hour initial notification for major ICT incidents
- Proportional ICT risk management frameworks with annual reviews
- Harmonized resilience standards across 27 EU member states
ISO 27018
ISO/IEC 27018:2025 Code of practice for PII protection
Key Features
- Privacy controls for PII processors in public clouds
- Subprocessor transparency and location disclosure
- Breach notification obligations to customers
- Prohibits PII use for marketing without consent
- Supports data subject rights like erasure
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
DORA Details
What It Is
DORA, formally Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is an EU-wide regulation bolstering digital operational resilience for the financial sector against ICT disruptions like cyberattacks and system failures. Applicable to 20 financial entity types and critical third-party providers (CTPPs) across 27 member states from January 17, 2025, it employs a risk-based, proportional approach to shift from reactive to proactive resilience strategies.
Key Components
- **ICT Risk Management FrameworksIdentification, mitigation, annual reviews integrated with business objectives.
- **Incident Reporting4-hour initial alerts, 72-hour updates, 1-month root-cause analysis for major incidents.
- **Resilience TestingAnnual basic tests; triennial threat-led penetration testing (TLPT) for critical functions.
- **Third-Party Risk OversightDue diligence, contractual clauses, ESAs direct supervision of CTPPs. Compliance via ESAs technical standards; penalties up to 2% global turnover.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for ~22,000 entities, DORA ensures legal compliance amid rising threats (74% ransomware incidents). It enhances systemic resilience, fosters transparency, builds stakeholder trust, and drives cybersecurity innovation, mitigating risks like 2024 CrowdStrike outage.
Implementation Overview
Gap analyses, framework development, testing programs, vendor monitoring. Tailored by size/complexity; no certification but authority reporting/audits required. Key activities: risk assessments, training, tool integration for ~12-18 months typical rollout.
ISO 27018 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27018 is a code of practice extending ISO 27001 and ISO 27002 for protecting personally identifiable information (PII) in public clouds where providers act as PII processors. Its primary purpose is to provide privacy-specific controls and guidance for cloud environments, focusing on multi-tenancy, cross-border processing, and processor obligations. It uses a risk-based, control-oriented approach integrated into an Information Security Management System (ISMS).
Key Components
- Core pillars: transparency, accountability, consent, purpose limitation, data minimization, security safeguards.
- Approximately 25–30 additional privacy controls mapped to ISO 27001 Annex A themes.
- Built on ISO 27002 guidance; not standalone but assessed during ISO 27001 audits.
- Certification via accredited bodies as ISMS extension, with 3-year validity and annual surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives customer trust, accelerates procurement, aligns with GDPR/HIPAA, reduces risk via subprocessors disclosure and breach notification. Offers competitive differentiation for CSPs and favorable cyber insurance terms.
Implementation Overview
Layer onto existing ISO 27001 ISMS; conduct gap analysis, update Statement of Applicability, implement controls like encryption and logging. Suited for CSPs of all sizes; requires third-party audits.
Key Differences
| Aspect | DORA | ISO 27018 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | EU financial ICT resilience | Cloud PII protection for processors |
| Industry | EU financial entities only | Global cloud service providers |
| Nature | Mandatory EU regulation | Voluntary ISO code of practice |
| Testing | Annual basic, triennial TLPT | ISO 27001 audit extension |
| Penalties | Up to 2% global turnover fines | No legal penalties, certification loss |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about DORA and ISO 27018
DORA FAQ
ISO 27018 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27001 Compliance
Discover top ISO 27001 compliance tools, their pros/cons, implementation steps, costs, and benefits. Streamline your path to certification and ongoing complianc
The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance
Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac
Top 5 Unseen Complexities Modern Compliance Software Effortlessly Manages
Uncover top 5 unseen complexities modern compliance software manages effortlessly—from sensitive data mapping to real-time regulatory shifts. Automate audits, i
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs CIS Controls
Compare FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs CIS Controls: Align electronic records compliance with cybersecurity safeguards for data integrity, audit trails & access mgmt. Boost regulated ops—read now!
UAE PDPL vs ISO 17025
Explore UAE PDPL vs ISO 17025: Align data privacy mandates with lab competence standards for secure, compliant testing. Key synergies, gaps & strategies for UAE labs.
IFS Food vs ISO 19600
Compare IFS Food vs ISO 19600: Decode food safety audits, governance & compliance gaps for manufacturers. Pick the ideal standard for risk-based excellence. Dive in!