Standards Comparison

    DORA

    Mandatory
    2023

    EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector

    VS

    K-PIPA

    Mandatory
    2011

    South Korea's regulation for personal information protection

    Quick Verdict

    DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU financial entities against disruptions, while K-PIPA enforces strict data privacy for all Korean data handlers. Companies adopt DORA for regulatory compliance and K-PIPA to avoid massive fines and build trust.

    Digital Operational Resilience

    DORA

    Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 Digital Operational Resilience Act

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Comprehensive ICT risk management framework overseen by management body
    • Standardized incident reporting within 4 hours to authorities
    • Risk-based resilience testing including triennial TLPT
    • Oversight of critical third-party ICT providers
    • Harmonized rules across 20 EU financial entity types
    Data Privacy

    K-PIPA

    Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Mandatory Chief Privacy Officer appointment
    • Granular explicit consent for sensitive processing
    • 72-hour breach notifications to subjects
    • Extraterritorial reach for foreign entities
    • 10-day data subject rights response deadlines

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    DORA Details

    What It Is

    DORA, formally Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is a transformative EU regulation for digital operational resilience in the financial sector. It bolsters resilience against ICT disruptions like cyberattacks and system failures, applying to 20 financial entity types (e.g., banks, insurers) and critical third-party providers. Employs a risk-based, proportional approach harmonizing rules across 27 member states.

    Key Components

    • **ICT Risk Management FrameworksIdentification, mitigation, and continuity plans.
    • **Incident Reporting4-hour initial alerts, 72-hour updates for major incidents.
    • **Resilience TestingAnnual basic tests, triennial TLPT for critical entities.
    • **Third-Party OversightDue diligence, monitoring, and ESAs supervision of CTPPs. Enforced via RTS/ITS, with noncompliance penalties up to 2% global turnover.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Legally mandated for ~22,000 EU entities to mitigate systemic risks, ensure compliance by January 2025, enhance cyber defenses amid rising threats (74% ransomware hit), build stakeholder trust, and drive cybersecurity investments.

    Implementation Overview

    Gap analyses, framework establishment, testing programs, vendor contracts. Tailored by size/complexity; full application January 17, 2025. Ongoing authority oversight, no formal certification but audits and reporting required. (178 words)

    K-PIPA Details

    What It Is

    K-PIPA, the Personal Information Protection Act, is South Korea's primary data privacy regulation, enacted in 2011 with amendments in 2020, 2023, and 2024. It safeguards personal, sensitive (e.g., health, biometrics), and unique ID information via a consent-centric, risk-based approach, covering all data handlers processing Korean residents' data domestically and extraterritorially.

    Key Components

    • **Core principlestransparency, purpose limitation, data minimization, accountability through mandatory Chief Privacy Officers (CPOs).
    • **Obligationsgranular explicit consents, security measures (encryption, access controls per 2024 Guidelines), data subject rights (access, erasure, portability within 10 days).
    • Enforced by PIPC with fines up to 3% annual revenue.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory compliance avoids severe penalties (e.g., Google's KRW 70B fine).
    • Builds stakeholder trust, enables EU adequacy data flows, mitigates breach risks.
    • Provides competitive edge in privacy-sensitive markets.

    Implementation Overview

    • **Phasedgap analysis, CPO governance, technical controls, training, breach playbooks.
    • Applies universally across sizes/sectors; PIPC audits, no certification required.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    DORA
    ICT resilience in finance
    K-PIPA
    Personal data protection all sectors

    Industry

    DORA
    EU financial entities only
    K-PIPA
    All industries, Korea extraterritorial

    Nature

    DORA
    Mandatory EU regulation
    K-PIPA
    Mandatory Korean law

    Testing

    DORA
    Annual basic, triennial TLPT
    K-PIPA
    Security audits, no mandated penetration

    Penalties

    DORA
    Up to 2% global turnover
    K-PIPA
    Up to 3% revenue, criminal sanctions

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about DORA and K-PIPA

    DORA FAQ

    K-PIPA FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages