DORA
EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector
K-PIPA
South Korea's regulation for personal information protection
Quick Verdict
DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU financial entities against disruptions, while K-PIPA enforces strict data privacy for all Korean data handlers. Companies adopt DORA for regulatory compliance and K-PIPA to avoid massive fines and build trust.
DORA
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 Digital Operational Resilience Act
Key Features
- Comprehensive ICT risk management framework overseen by management body
- Standardized incident reporting within 4 hours to authorities
- Risk-based resilience testing including triennial TLPT
- Oversight of critical third-party ICT providers
- Harmonized rules across 20 EU financial entity types
K-PIPA
Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)
Key Features
- Mandatory Chief Privacy Officer appointment
- Granular explicit consent for sensitive processing
- 72-hour breach notifications to subjects
- Extraterritorial reach for foreign entities
- 10-day data subject rights response deadlines
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
DORA Details
What It Is
DORA, formally Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is a transformative EU regulation for digital operational resilience in the financial sector. It bolsters resilience against ICT disruptions like cyberattacks and system failures, applying to 20 financial entity types (e.g., banks, insurers) and critical third-party providers. Employs a risk-based, proportional approach harmonizing rules across 27 member states.
Key Components
- **ICT Risk Management FrameworksIdentification, mitigation, and continuity plans.
- **Incident Reporting4-hour initial alerts, 72-hour updates for major incidents.
- **Resilience TestingAnnual basic tests, triennial TLPT for critical entities.
- **Third-Party OversightDue diligence, monitoring, and ESAs supervision of CTPPs. Enforced via RTS/ITS, with noncompliance penalties up to 2% global turnover.
Why Organizations Use It
Legally mandated for ~22,000 EU entities to mitigate systemic risks, ensure compliance by January 2025, enhance cyber defenses amid rising threats (74% ransomware hit), build stakeholder trust, and drive cybersecurity investments.
Implementation Overview
Gap analyses, framework establishment, testing programs, vendor contracts. Tailored by size/complexity; full application January 17, 2025. Ongoing authority oversight, no formal certification but audits and reporting required. (178 words)
K-PIPA Details
What It Is
K-PIPA, the Personal Information Protection Act, is South Korea's primary data privacy regulation, enacted in 2011 with amendments in 2020, 2023, and 2024. It safeguards personal, sensitive (e.g., health, biometrics), and unique ID information via a consent-centric, risk-based approach, covering all data handlers processing Korean residents' data domestically and extraterritorially.
Key Components
- **Core principlestransparency, purpose limitation, data minimization, accountability through mandatory Chief Privacy Officers (CPOs).
- **Obligationsgranular explicit consents, security measures (encryption, access controls per 2024 Guidelines), data subject rights (access, erasure, portability within 10 days).
- Enforced by PIPC with fines up to 3% annual revenue.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory compliance avoids severe penalties (e.g., Google's KRW 70B fine).
- Builds stakeholder trust, enables EU adequacy data flows, mitigates breach risks.
- Provides competitive edge in privacy-sensitive markets.
Implementation Overview
- **Phasedgap analysis, CPO governance, technical controls, training, breach playbooks.
- Applies universally across sizes/sectors; PIPC audits, no certification required.
Key Differences
| Aspect | DORA | K-PIPA |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | ICT resilience in finance | Personal data protection all sectors |
| Industry | EU financial entities only | All industries, Korea extraterritorial |
| Nature | Mandatory EU regulation | Mandatory Korean law |
| Testing | Annual basic, triennial TLPT | Security audits, no mandated penetration |
| Penalties | Up to 2% global turnover | Up to 3% revenue, criminal sanctions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about DORA and K-PIPA
DORA FAQ
K-PIPA FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

TISAX Tabletop Exercises for EV Battery Suppliers: Ransomware Drill Scripts and AAR Templates with 2025 ENX Podcast Breakdown
Practical TISAX tabletop scripts for EV battery suppliers facing 'Very High' ASLP. Download ransomware AAR templates, get 2024 ENX lessons & 2025 podcast on VDA

SEC Cybersecurity Rules Materiality Determination Framework: Step-by-Step Guide with Checklists and Real-World Examples
Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 materiality determinations with our step-by-step framework, checklists, case law factors, and real-world examples. Avoid enforceme

Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption
Bust 10 NIST CSF 2.0 myths like 'only for critical infrastructure' or 'Govern replaces Identify'. Plain-English breakdowns, evidence, and fixes for flexible ris
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
NIST CSF vs APRA CPS 234
Compare NIST CSF vs APRA CPS 234: Flexible US framework meets Australia's strict finance cyber rules. Key diffs in Govern, tiers, testing & 72h reporting—align for resilient compliance now!
WELL vs BREEAM
Compare WELL vs BREEAM: WELL drives occupant health via 10 concepts & onsite testing; BREEAM excels in sustainability with weighted credits. Pick the right path for peak performance!
ISA 95 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Discover ISA 95 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Purdue levels meet 8-K disclosures. Align manufacturing integration with cyber compliance for secure ops. Dive in now!