DORA
EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector
MAS TRM
Singapore guidelines for financial technology risk management.
Quick Verdict
DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU finance via testing and oversight, while MAS TRM guides Singapore FIs on proportionate tech risk governance and cyber controls. Organizations adopt DORA for regulatory compliance, MAS TRM to meet supervisory expectations and build resilience.
DORA
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 Digital Operational Resilience Act
Key Features
- Mandates comprehensive ICT risk management frameworks
- Enforces 4-hour initial incident reporting timelines
- Requires triennial threat-led penetration testing (TLPT)
- Oversees critical third-party ICT providers (CTPPs)
- Promotes cyber threat information sharing
MAS TRM
MAS Technology Risk Management Guidelines
Key Features
- Board and senior management accountability
- Proportionality based on risk and complexity
- Third-party risk as first-class domain
- Defence-in-depth cyber resilience controls
- Annual penetration testing for internet systems
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
DORA Details
What It Is
Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), formally Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is an EU-wide regulation strengthening digital resilience of financial entities against ICT disruptions like cyberattacks and third-party failures. Applicable to 20 financial entity types and critical ICT third-party providers (CTPPs), it employs a risk-based, proportional approach to harmonize rules across member states, entering full application January 17, 2025.
Key Components
- **ICT Risk Management FrameworksIdentification, mitigation, annual reviews.
- **Incident Reporting4-hour initial, 72-hour intermediate notifications for major events.
- **Resilience TestingAnnual basic tests, triennial TLPT for critical functions.
- **Third-Party OversightDue diligence, contracts, ESAs supervision of CTPPs.
- Information sharing on threats. Compliance enforced via RTS/ITS, with fines up to 2% global turnover.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for ~22,000 EU entities to mitigate systemic risks (74% ransomware hit), ensure business continuity, build stakeholder trust, and address threats like 2024 CrowdStrike outage. Drives cybersecurity investments (€10-15B EU-wide).
Implementation Overview
Conduct gap analyses, develop frameworks, implement testing/vendor management. Tailored by size/complexity; preparation since 2023. Ongoing audits, reporting to authorities required.
MAS TRM Details
What It Is
MAS Technology Risk Management (TRM) Guidelines (revised January 2021) are supervisory guidance from the Monetary Authority of Singapore for financial institutions. They provide a principles-based framework for governing and controlling technology and cyber risks, emphasizing proportionality to risk profile, complexity, and service criticality. Scope covers governance, operations, cybersecurity, resilience, and third-party risks to ensure CIA of systems and data.
Key Components
- 15 sections spanning governance, risk frameworks, SDLC, IT service management, resilience, access controls, cryptography, cyber operations, assessments, and audit.
- Synthesised into 12 core principles like board accountability, asset inventories, security-by-design, and layered defences.
- No fixed control count; focuses on outcomes via defence-in-depth and continuous improvement.
- Compliance assessed via supervisory review, not formal certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets MAS supervisory expectations to avoid fines/enforcement.
- Enhances resilience, reduces cyber/incident risks, builds customer trust.
- Supports digital transformation securely; differentiates in partnerships.
Implementation Overview
- Risk-based rollout: asset inventory, control mapping, testing cycles.
- Applies to all MAS-supervised FIs; scalable by size/complexity.
- Involves governance setup, training, audits; 12-18 months typical.
Key Differences
| Aspect | DORA | MAS TRM |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | ICT risk mgmt, incident reporting, resilience testing, third-party oversight | Governance, secure dev, IT ops, cyber defence, resilience, third-party |
| Industry | EU financial entities (20 types), critical ICT providers | Singapore financial institutions (banks, insurers, fintechs) |
| Nature | Mandatory EU regulation (2022/2554), enforced by ESAs | Supervisory guidelines, proportionate observance considered in supervision |
| Testing | Annual basic, triennial TLPT for critical entities | Annual PT for internet-facing systems, regular VA, cyber exercises |
| Penalties | Up to 2% global turnover, individual fines | Supervisory actions, fines, license conditions, executive prohibitions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about DORA and MAS TRM
DORA FAQ
MAS TRM FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
TISAX Tabletop Exercises for EV Battery Suppliers: Ransomware Drill Scripts and AAR Templates with 2025 ENX Podcast Breakdown
Practical TISAX tabletop scripts for EV battery suppliers facing 'Very High' ASLP. Download ransomware AAR templates, get 2024 ENX lessons & 2025 podcast on VDA
CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation
Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc
From Data Fragments to Strategic Insight: Powering Intelligent Risk Management with Integrated Compliance Monitoring
Transform data fragments into strategic insights with integrated compliance monitoring. Automate real-time risk management, ensure GDPR & SOC 2 compliance, and
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
DORA vs GDPR UK
Decode DORA vs GDPR UK: Key differences for finance pros on ICT risks, resilience testing, third-party oversight & data protection. Comply by 2025 now.
POPIA vs CAA
Explore POPIA vs CAA: South Africa's privacy law vs US Clean Air Act. Unpack differences in scope, data rights, emissions standards, enforcement & compliance strategies for execs.
GRI vs SAMA CSF
Compare GRI sustainability standards vs SAMA CSF cybersecurity framework: key differences in compliance, governance & HES reporting. Unlock expert strategies for resilient ESG-cyber integration now!