Standards Comparison

    DORA

    Mandatory
    2023

    EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector

    VS

    OSHA

    Mandatory
    1970

    US federal regulation for workplace safety standards

    Quick Verdict

    DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU finance against cyber threats via testing and reporting, while OSHA enforces workplace safety standards across US industries through inspections and hazard controls. Organizations adopt DORA for regulatory compliance, OSHA to avoid fines and ensure worker protection.

    Digital Operational Resilience

    DORA

    Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Digital Operational Resilience Act

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates comprehensive ICT risk management frameworks overseen by management
    • Standardizes incident classification and reporting within 4 hours
    • Requires annual basic and triennial TLPT resilience testing
    • Enforces ESAs oversight of critical third-party ICT providers
    • Applies proportionally to 20 types of EU financial entities
    Occupational Safety

    OSHA

    Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Enforces standards through inspections and penalties
    • Mandates hierarchy of controls for hazards
    • Requires OSHA 300 injury recordkeeping
    • Demands written programs like HazCom, LOTO
    • Provides training, outreach, whistleblower protections

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    DORA Details

    What It Is

    Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), formally Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is a transformative EU regulation enhancing digital operational resilience against ICT disruptions like cyberattacks and third-party failures. It targets the financial sector, covering 20 entity types including banks, insurers, and crypto providers, plus critical ICT third-parties. Employs a risk-based, proportional approach harmonizing rules across 27 member states.

    Key Components

    • **ICT Risk Management FrameworksIdentification, mitigation, annual reviews.
    • **Incident Reporting4-hour initial, 72-hour intermediate notifications for major incidents.
    • **Resilience TestingAnnual basic tests, triennial threat-led penetration testing (TLPT).
    • **Third-Party OversightDue diligence, ESAs supervision of CTPPs. Built on proactive principles; compliance via authority reporting, no traditional certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandated to avoid fines up to 2% global turnover. Bolsters resilience amid rising threats (74% ransomware hit), ensures business continuity, fosters trust. Drives harmonized compliance, innovation in tools, competitive edge in cyber-mature markets.

    Implementation Overview

    Conduct gap analyses per RTS/ITS, develop frameworks, map vendors, run tests. Applies EU-wide to ~22,000 entities, scaled by size/risk. Key activities: training, simulations, audits. Full application January 2025; ongoing ESAs oversight.

    OSHA Details

    What It Is

    OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) enforces the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, a US federal regulation assuring safe, healthful working conditions. It covers private-sector employers via standards in 29 CFR Parts 1900–2400, using a risk-based approach with hierarchy of controls and PDCA cycles.

    Key Components

    • Major standards: General Industry (1910), Construction (1926), Maritime, Agriculture.
    • Core elements: hazard identification, written programs (IIPP, HazCom, LOTO), recordkeeping (OSHA 300 logs), training, inspections.
    • Built on General Duty Clause; compliance via enforcement, no formal certification but voluntary VPP.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory compliance avoids fines (up to $165K+), shutdowns, litigation.
    • Reduces injury rates, insurance costs, turnover; boosts productivity, ESG reputation, market access.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased framework: governance, gap analysis, program design, rollout, audits. Applies to US employers (most industries, sizes); state plans vary. Involves JHAs, training, EHS software; multi-year for complex ops. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    DORA
    Digital operational resilience for ICT risks
    OSHA
    Physical safety, health hazards, general industry

    Industry

    DORA
    EU financial entities and ICT providers
    OSHA
    US private sector employers across industries

    Nature

    DORA
    Mandatory EU regulation with ESAs oversight
    OSHA
    Mandatory US federal standards with inspections

    Testing

    DORA
    Annual basic, triennial TLPT for critical
    OSHA
    Internal audits, mock inspections, JHAs

    Penalties

    DORA
    Up to 2% global turnover fines
    OSHA
    Civil fines up to $165k per willful violation

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about DORA and OSHA

    DORA FAQ

    OSHA FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages