Standards Comparison

    DORA

    Mandatory
    2023

    EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector

    VS

    PCI DSS

    Mandatory
    2022

    Industry standard for protecting payment cardholder data.

    Quick Verdict

    DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU financial entities via risk frameworks and testing, while PCI DSS enforces cardholder data security globally through 12 requirements and audits. Organizations adopt DORA for regulatory compliance, PCI DSS to avoid breach fines and retain processing rights.

    Digital Operational Resilience

    DORA

    Digital Operational Resilience Act (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Comprehensive ICT risk management frameworks with proportionality
    • 4-hour initial reporting for major ICT incidents
    • Mandatory annual tests and triennial threat-led penetration testing
    • ESAs oversight of critical third-party ICT providers
    • Harmonized resilience rules across 27 EU states
    Payment Security

    PCI DSS

    Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • 12 requirements across 6 control objectives for CHD protection
    • Tiered merchant and service provider compliance levels
    • Quarterly ASV vulnerability scans and penetration tests
    • Mandatory network segmentation to scope CDE
    • Strong cryptography, MFA, and third-party risk focus

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    DORA Details

    What It Is

    Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is an EU-wide regulation enhancing digital operational resilience in finance against ICT risks like cyberattacks. It targets 20 financial entity types (~22,000 entities) and critical third-party providers (CTPPs). Adopts a proactive, risk-based approach shifting from capital buffers to tech-centric strategies.

    Key Components

    • **ICT Risk ManagementFrameworks for identification, mitigation, annual reviews.
    • **Incident Reporting4-hour initial, 72-hour intermediate notifications for major events (>5% users or €100k loss).
    • **Resilience TestingAnnual basic scans, triennial TLPT for critical entities.
    • **Third-Party OversightDue diligence, monitoring, ESAs supervision via JETs.
    • **Information SharingThreat intelligence collaboration. Proportionality principle applies; penalties up to 2% global turnover.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandatory compliance by January 2025 mitigates systemic risks (74% ransomware hit). Boosts resilience post-CrowdStrike outage, fosters trust, drives €10-15B investments, harmonizes rules across states.

    Implementation Overview

    Gap analyses, framework builds, testing programs, vendor mapping. Tailored by size/complexity; EU financial sector focus. Regulatory reporting, no formal certification but ESAs audits.

    PCI DSS Details

    What It Is

    The Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) is a set of security standards for entities handling credit, debit, or prepaid card data from major brands. Managed by the PCI Security Standards Council (PCI SSC) since 2006, it is a contractual industry framework, not a law. Its primary purpose is safeguarding cardholder data (CHD) and sensitive authentication data (SAD) during storage, processing, and transmission. It uses a prescriptive, control-based approach with 12 requirements across 6 control objectives.

    Key Components

    • 12 Requirements in 6 objectives: secure networks, protect CHD, vulnerability management, restrict access, monitor networks, maintain policies.
    • Over 300 sub-requirements for granular technical/operational controls.
    • Core principles: defense-in-depth, segmentation.
    • Compliance via levels (4 merchant, 2 service provider), SAQs, QSA ROCs, ASV scans.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Contractual mandate to avoid fines, bans, breach costs ($37/record avg.).
    • Builds trust, aligns with GDPR.
    • Mitigates risks from evolving threats like ransomware.
    • Competitive advantage for merchants/service providers.

    Implementation Overview

    • Scope CDE, gap analysis, remediate via segmentation, encryption, MFA.
    • All sizes/industries handling cards, global applicability.
    • Quarterly scans, annual audits (v4.0 mandatory 2024).

    Key Differences

    Scope

    DORA
    Digital operational resilience in finance
    PCI DSS
    Cardholder data protection

    Industry

    DORA
    EU financial entities only
    PCI DSS
    Global payment card handlers

    Nature

    DORA
    Mandatory EU regulation
    PCI DSS
    Contractual industry standard

    Testing

    DORA
    Annual tests, triennial TLPT
    PCI DSS
    Quarterly scans, pentests

    Penalties

    DORA
    2% global turnover fines
    PCI DSS
    Fines, processing privilege loss

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about DORA and PCI DSS

    DORA FAQ

    PCI DSS FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages