Standards Comparison

    DORA

    Mandatory
    2023

    EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector

    VS

    PDPA

    Mandatory
    2012

    Southeast Asia regulations for personal data protection

    Quick Verdict

    DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU finance against cyber threats via testing and oversight, while PDPA governs personal data protection in Asia with consent, security, and breach rules. Firms adopt DORA for regulatory compliance, PDPA for privacy trust and fines avoidance.

    Digital Operational Resilience

    DORA

    Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Digital Operational Resilience Act

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Requires comprehensive ICT risk management frameworks
    • Mandates 4-hour initial incident reporting
    • Enforces triennial threat-led penetration testing
    • Oversees critical third-party ICT providers
    • Applies proportionality to entity size
    Data Privacy

    PDPA

    Personal Data Protection Act 2012

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Mandatory Data Protection Officer in key regimes
    • 72-hour breach notification to regulators
    • Consent with structured exceptions and withdrawal
    • Data subject rights including access and correction
    • Cross-border transfer limitation obligations

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    DORA Details

    What It Is

    Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is an EU regulation bolstering ICT resilience for financial entities against disruptions like cyberattacks. Applicable from January 17, 2025, to 20 entity types and CTPPs across 27 states, it uses a risk-based, proactive methodology harmonizing rules.

    Key Components

    • **ICT Risk FrameworksIdentify, mitigate risks with annual reviews.
    • **Incident Reporting4/72-hour notifications, 1-month analysis for major events.
    • **Resilience TestingAnnual basic; triennial TLPT.
    • **Third-Party OversightDue diligence, ESAs supervision of CTPPs. Proportionality-based; promotes information sharing. Compliance via reporting, penalties up to 2% turnover.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandatory for EU finance to avert fines, mitigate threats (74% ransomware hit). Enhances third-party management, systemic resilience, stakeholder trust amid rising incidents like CrowdStrike outage.

    Implementation Overview

    Gap analysis against RTS/ITS, policy development, testing programs, vendor contracts. Tailored to size/risk; financial sector focus. Ongoing audits, no certification but ESAs oversight.

    PDPA Details

    What It Is

    PDPA (Personal Data Protection Act) refers to a family of data protection laws in jurisdictions like Singapore (2012), Thailand (2019), and Taiwan, primarily regulating collection, use, disclosure, and transfer of personal data by organizations. These are principle-based regulations balancing individual privacy rights with legitimate business needs, employing a risk-based approach with consent, exceptions, and accountability.

    Key Components

    • Core obligations: consent/notification, purpose limitation, data subject rights (access/correction), security safeguards, retention limits, transfer controls, breach notification, accountability (often DPO).
    • Built on GDPR-influenced principles; 8-10 main requirements varying by jurisdiction.
    • Compliance via self-assessment, no universal certification but regulator enforcement.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory in applicable jurisdictions for data handlers; avoids fines (up to SGD 1M, THB 5M).
    • Enhances risk management, builds trust, enables cross-border operations.
    • Strategic for regional business, GDPR alignment, competitive differentiation.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: governance, data mapping, policies, controls, training, audits.
    • Applies to all sizes handling local data; Singapore/Thailand focus.
    • No certification; ongoing DPMP, regulator guidance (PDPC).

    Key Differences

    Scope

    DORA
    Digital operational resilience against ICT risks
    PDPA
    Personal data collection, use, disclosure, protection

    Industry

    DORA
    EU financial entities and critical ICT providers
    PDPA
    Private sector organizations in Singapore/Thailand/Taiwan

    Nature

    DORA
    Mandatory EU regulation with ESAs enforcement
    PDPA
    Mandatory national acts with PDPC/PDPC fines

    Testing

    DORA
    Annual basic tests, triennial TLPT for critical entities
    PDPA
    Security measures, DPIAs, penetration tests recommended

    Penalties

    DORA
    Up to 2% global turnover or €5M individual fines
    PDPA
    SGD1M/THB5M fines, criminal liability possible

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about DORA and PDPA

    DORA FAQ

    PDPA FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages