DORA
EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector
PDPA
Southeast Asia regulations for personal data protection
Quick Verdict
DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU finance against cyber threats via testing and oversight, while PDPA governs personal data protection in Asia with consent, security, and breach rules. Firms adopt DORA for regulatory compliance, PDPA for privacy trust and fines avoidance.
DORA
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Digital Operational Resilience Act
Key Features
- Requires comprehensive ICT risk management frameworks
- Mandates 4-hour initial incident reporting
- Enforces triennial threat-led penetration testing
- Oversees critical third-party ICT providers
- Applies proportionality to entity size
PDPA
Personal Data Protection Act 2012
Key Features
- Mandatory Data Protection Officer in key regimes
- 72-hour breach notification to regulators
- Consent with structured exceptions and withdrawal
- Data subject rights including access and correction
- Cross-border transfer limitation obligations
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
DORA Details
What It Is
Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is an EU regulation bolstering ICT resilience for financial entities against disruptions like cyberattacks. Applicable from January 17, 2025, to 20 entity types and CTPPs across 27 states, it uses a risk-based, proactive methodology harmonizing rules.
Key Components
- **ICT Risk FrameworksIdentify, mitigate risks with annual reviews.
- **Incident Reporting4/72-hour notifications, 1-month analysis for major events.
- **Resilience TestingAnnual basic; triennial TLPT.
- **Third-Party OversightDue diligence, ESAs supervision of CTPPs. Proportionality-based; promotes information sharing. Compliance via reporting, penalties up to 2% turnover.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for EU finance to avert fines, mitigate threats (74% ransomware hit). Enhances third-party management, systemic resilience, stakeholder trust amid rising incidents like CrowdStrike outage.
Implementation Overview
Gap analysis against RTS/ITS, policy development, testing programs, vendor contracts. Tailored to size/risk; financial sector focus. Ongoing audits, no certification but ESAs oversight.
PDPA Details
What It Is
PDPA (Personal Data Protection Act) refers to a family of data protection laws in jurisdictions like Singapore (2012), Thailand (2019), and Taiwan, primarily regulating collection, use, disclosure, and transfer of personal data by organizations. These are principle-based regulations balancing individual privacy rights with legitimate business needs, employing a risk-based approach with consent, exceptions, and accountability.
Key Components
- Core obligations: consent/notification, purpose limitation, data subject rights (access/correction), security safeguards, retention limits, transfer controls, breach notification, accountability (often DPO).
- Built on GDPR-influenced principles; 8-10 main requirements varying by jurisdiction.
- Compliance via self-assessment, no universal certification but regulator enforcement.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory in applicable jurisdictions for data handlers; avoids fines (up to SGD 1M, THB 5M).
- Enhances risk management, builds trust, enables cross-border operations.
- Strategic for regional business, GDPR alignment, competitive differentiation.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: governance, data mapping, policies, controls, training, audits.
- Applies to all sizes handling local data; Singapore/Thailand focus.
- No certification; ongoing DPMP, regulator guidance (PDPC).
Key Differences
| Aspect | DORA | PDPA |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Digital operational resilience against ICT risks | Personal data collection, use, disclosure, protection |
| Industry | EU financial entities and critical ICT providers | Private sector organizations in Singapore/Thailand/Taiwan |
| Nature | Mandatory EU regulation with ESAs enforcement | Mandatory national acts with PDPC/PDPC fines |
| Testing | Annual basic tests, triennial TLPT for critical entities | Security measures, DPIAs, penetration tests recommended |
| Penalties | Up to 2% global turnover or €5M individual fines | SGD1M/THB5M fines, criminal liability possible |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about DORA and PDPA
DORA FAQ
PDPA FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions
Unpack NIST CSF 2.0's enhanced Core Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. Get SME playbooks, governance shifts & strategies for cyber

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense
Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy

NIST CSF 2.0: Key Enhancements and How They Address Evolving Cyber Threats
Explore NIST CSF 2.0 updates: Govern function, supply chain security, SME playbooks for ransomware & AI threats. Boost your cyber defenses now!
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
EU AI Act vs ISO 41001
Compare EU AI Act vs ISO 41001: Decode risk-based AI rules against FM standards for seamless compliance, strategy & implementation. Boost governance today!
AEO vs WCAG
Compare AEO vs WCAG: Uncover key differences in compliance standards for supply chain security (AEO) and web accessibility (WCAG). Gain implementation insights, benefits, and strategies to boost efficiency now.
GMP vs PIPEDA
Discover GMP vs PIPEDA: Pharma manufacturing standards meet Canada's privacy law. Unlock compliance strategies, risk insights. Expert comparison awaits!