Standards Comparison

    DORA

    Mandatory
    2023

    EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector

    VS

    PIPEDA

    Mandatory
    2000

    Canada's federal privacy law for private-sector personal information.

    Quick Verdict

    DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU financial firms against cyber threats, while PIPEDA enforces privacy principles for Canadian businesses handling personal data. Organizations adopt DORA for regulatory compliance and systemic stability; PIPEDA for consumer trust and breach prevention.

    Digital Operational Resilience

    DORA

    Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 Digital Operational Resilience Act

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates comprehensive ICT risk management frameworks
    • Requires 4-hour incident reporting for major events
    • Enforces triennial threat-led penetration testing (TLPT)
    • Oversees critical third-party ICT providers (CTPPs)
    • Applies proportionality based on entity size and risk
    Data Privacy

    PIPEDA

    Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • 10 Fair Information Principles framework
    • Designated privacy officer for accountability
    • Meaningful consent for sensitive data
    • Proportional safeguards by data sensitivity
    • Breach reporting for significant harm risk

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    DORA Details

    What It Is

    DORA, formally Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is an EU-wide regulation enhancing digital operational resilience for the financial sector against ICT disruptions like cyberattacks and third-party failures. Applicable from January 17, 2025, it covers 20 financial entity types and critical ICT providers, using a risk-based, proportional approach.

    Key Components

    • **ICT Risk ManagementFrameworks for identification, mitigation, and annual reviews overseen by management.
    • **Incident ReportingClassification and notifications (4 hours initial, 72 hours intermediate, 1-month root cause).
    • **Resilience TestingAnnual basic tests; triennial TLPT for critical entities.
    • **Third-Party OversightDue diligence, monitoring, and ESAs supervision of CTPPs. Compliance enforced via penalties up to 2% global turnover; no formal certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Legally mandated for EU financial entities (~22,000) to mitigate systemic risks, ensure business continuity, avoid fines, build stakeholder trust, and harmonize rules across 27 states amid rising threats like ransomware (74% affected).

    Implementation Overview

    Gap analyses, framework development, tool adoption, testing programs, and reporting setup. Proportional to size/complexity; targets large banks to fintechs. Ongoing ESAs oversight; prepare via RTS/ITS batches for 2025 deadline.

    PIPEDA Details

    What It Is

    PIPEDA (Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act) is Canada's federal privacy regulation governing private-sector organizations in commercial activities. Enacted in 2000, it protects personal information—any data about identifiable individuals—via national standards. Its principles-based approach uses 10 Fair Information Principles in Schedule 1, derived from CSA Model Code, balancing business needs with privacy rights.

    Key Components

    • **10 Fair Information PrinciplesAccountability, identifying purposes, consent, limiting collection/use/retention, accuracy, safeguards, openness, individual access, challenging compliance.
    • Flexible framework, no fixed controls; emphasizes data minimization, safeguards, and rights.
    • Overseen by Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC); no formal certification, but audits and court enforcement.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory compliance avoids OPC investigations, fines up to CAD $100,000, reputational harm.
    • Builds consumer trust, mitigates breach costs, enables competitive advantage in digital economy.
    • Enhances risk management, operational efficiency via governance and training.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, appoint privacy officer, policies/PIAs, controls/training, audits.
    • Applies to commercial activities, cross-border/FWUBs; exemptions for some provincial laws.
    • Self-managed with OPC tools; 6-12 months typical for mid-size orgs.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    DORA
    Digital operational resilience in finance
    PIPEDA
    Personal information protection in commercial activities

    Industry

    DORA
    EU financial entities and ICT providers
    PIPEDA
    Canadian private sector commercial activities

    Nature

    DORA
    Mandatory EU regulation with ESAs enforcement
    PIPEDA
    Principles-based federal privacy law, OPC oversight

    Testing

    DORA
    Annual basic tests, triennial TLPT
    PIPEDA
    Audits, PIAs, no mandatory penetration testing

    Penalties

    DORA
    Up to 2% global turnover fines
    PIPEDA
    Up to CAD $100k fines, court orders

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about DORA and PIPEDA

    DORA FAQ

    PIPEDA FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages