What is the primary objective of **DORA**?

**The primary objective of DORA is to strengthen the digital operational resilience of the EU financial sector against ICT disruptions, including cyberattacks, system failures, and third-party risks.** Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 mandates proactive ICT risk management, incident reporting, resilience testing, and third-party oversight for 20 types of financial entities and critical ICT third-party providers (CTPPs), applying from January 17, 2025.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **DORA**?

**DORA legally requires compliance from approximately 22,000 EU-regulated financial entities across 20 types, including credit institutions, insurance undertakings, investment firms, payment institutions, and crypto-asset service providers, plus designated CTPPs.** Critical third-party providers like cloud and data analytics firms face direct ESA oversight via Joint Examination Teams (JETs).

Does **DORA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**DORA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification but requires independent digital operational resilience testing, including risk-based annual basic tests and triennial threat-led penetration testing (TLPT) for critical entities.** Testing may involve external providers, with results reported to authorities and scopes validated per Batch 2 RTS (July 17, 2024).

How often should an assessment for **DORA** be performed?

**DORA mandates annual basic ICT resilience tests, such as vulnerability assessments, for all in-scope entities, with triennial advanced TLPT for those designated as critical.** ICT risk management frameworks must undergo annual reviews, tailored proportionally to entity size, complexity, and risk exposure.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **DORA**?

**Non-compliance with DORA can result in administrative fines up to 2% of total global annual turnover for firms or €5 million (or 10% of annual salary) for individuals, imposed by ESAs or competent authorities.** Additional measures include remedial orders, oversight fees up to €1 million annually for CTPPs, and reputational damage from public reporting.

Can **DORA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, DORA's ICT risk management, incident reporting, testing, and third-party oversight elements can be mapped to other international frameworks, leveraging existing compliance for efficiency.** Financial entities often align DORA's proportional controls and reporting timelines with prior EBA guidelines or Solvency II integrations.

What is the first step to begin implementing **DORA**?

**The first step to implement DORA is to conduct a gap analysis against the published Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) on ICT risk frameworks (Batch 1, January 17, 2024).** This identifies deficiencies in ICT strategies, incident classification, third-party policies, and testing plans ahead of the January 17, 2025, application date.

What is the primary objective of **PIPL**?

**PIPL's primary objective is to protect natural persons' personal information rights while regulating processing activities to promote reasonable data use.** Enacted August 20, 2021, and effective November 1, 2021, the law's 74 articles establish principles of lawfulness, necessity, minimization, transparency, accuracy, integrity, confidentiality, and accountability for personal information handlers (Article 5).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **PIPL**?

**PIPL requires compliance from any organization or individual handling personal information of natural persons within China, plus extraterritorial entities providing products/services to or analyzing behaviors of individuals in China (Article 3).** This includes domestic firms and multinationals; foreign handlers must appoint a China-based representative (Article 53). Handlers processing PI of over 1 million individuals must designate a Personal Information Protection Officer.

Does **PIPL** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**PIPL does not universally mandate external audits or third-party certification but requires them for specific high-risk scenarios.** Handlers of PI from over 10 million individuals must conduct compliance audits at least every two years (2025 Measures); cross-border transfers exceeding 1 million individuals' PI or 10,000 sensitive PI require CAC security assessments or certification. Internal audits and PIPIAs are mandatory for SPI processing and ADM.

How often should an assessment for **PIPL** be performed?

**PIPL mandates regular internal assessments, with specific frequencies for high-volume handlers.** Personal Information Protection Impact Assessments (PIPIAs) are required before high-risk processing like SPI or cross-border transfers (Article 55), retained for at least three years; handlers of over 10 million individuals' PI must audit compliance every two years, and over 1 million must designate audit responsibility persons.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **PIPL**?

**Non-compliance with PIPL incurs administrative fines up to RMB 50 million or 5% of prior-year global revenue for grave violations (Article 66).** Penalties include corrective orders, business suspension, license revocation, disgorgement of gains; directly responsible personnel face fines up to RMB 1 million and management bans. Civil liability shifts proof burden to handlers; severe cases trigger criminal penalties.

An **PIPL** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, PIPL shares structural similarities with the EU GDPR, facilitating partial mappings despite key differences.** Both emphasize data minimization, transparency, accountability, individual rights, and risk-based assessments, but PIPL lacks a "legitimate interests" basis, mandates stricter consent for SPI/cross-border transfers, and ties obligations to national security via localization for CIIOs.

What is the first step to begin implementing **PIPL**?

**The first step for PIPL implementation is a comprehensive gap analysis and data mapping (Phase 1).** Inventory all PI flows, systems, volumes, and sensitivity (e.g., SPI categories like biometrics, minors under 14); classify against legal bases, purposes, retention, and transfers to produce a processing register, risk heatmap, and prioritized remediation backlog.

DORA vs PIPL | GRADUM

Standards Comparison

DORA

Mandatory

2023

EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector

PIPL

Mandatory

2021

China’s regulation for personal information protection

Quick Verdict

DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU financial firms against disruptions, while PIPL enforces strict data privacy for any entity handling Chinese personal information. Companies adopt DORA for regulatory compliance and systemic stability, PIPL for market access and avoiding massive fines.

Digital Operational Resilience

DORA

Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Digital Operational Resilience Act

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Mandates comprehensive ICT risk management frameworks
Requires 4-hour initial reporting of major incidents
Mandates triennial threat-led penetration testing (TLPT)
Establishes oversight of critical ICT third-party providers
Harmonizes resilience across 20 financial entity types

Data Privacy

PIPL

Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Extraterritorial scope targeting China individuals
Strict separate consent for sensitive PI
Cross-border transfer mechanisms with thresholds
Data localization for CIIOs and large volumes
Fines up to 5% annual revenue

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

DORA Details

What It Is

Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), formally Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is an EU-wide regulation bolstering digital operational resilience in the financial sector against ICT risks like cyberattacks and third-party failures. It covers 20 financial entity types (e.g., banks, insurers, crypto providers) and critical ICT third-party providers (CTPPs), using a proportional, risk-based approach harmonized across 27 member states.

Key Components

**ICT Risk Management FrameworksStrategies for risk identification, mitigation, and annual reviews.
**Incident Reporting4-hour initial alerts, 72-hour updates for major incidents (>5% users or €100k losses).
**Resilience TestingAnnual basic tests; triennial threat-led penetration testing (TLPT).
**Third-Party OversightDue diligence, monitoring, ESAs supervision of CTPPs. No formal certification; compliance enforced via RTS/ITS and penalties up to 2% turnover.

Why Organizations Use It

Ensures legal compliance amid 2025 deadline, avoiding hefty fines.
Mitigates systemic risks (74% firms hit by ransomware).
Strengthens third-party controls post-CrowdStrike incidents.
Enhances reputation, drives €10-15B cybersecurity investments, builds regulator trust.

Implementation Overview

Gap analyses against 2024 RTS/ITS; develop frameworks, testing plans, vendor contracts. Proportional by size/complexity; EU-focused for ~22,000 entities. Involves training, multi-vendor strategies, ongoing monitoring. Full application January 17, 2025.

PIPL Details

What It Is

PIPL (Personal Information Protection Law) is China's comprehensive national regulation enacted in 2021, governing collection, use, storage, transfer, and deletion of personal information. It applies domestically and extraterritorially to organizations processing data of individuals in China, using a risk-based approach with strict consent defaults.

Key Components

Core principles: lawfulness, necessity, minimization, transparency, accountability.
74 articles across 8 chapters covering processing rules, cross-border transfers, individual rights.
Sensitive personal information (SPI) rules, PIPIA assessments, 7 legal bases (consent-focused).
Compliance via governance, audits; no certification but CAC security reviews for transfers.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for market access, avoiding fines up to 5% revenue or RMB 50M.
Enhances trust, resilience; enables cross-border business.
Mitigates risks in China's digital economy; strategic for MNCs.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, data mapping, policies, controls, ongoing governance (6-12 months).
Applies to all sizes handling Chinese PI; high focus on platforms, CIIOs.
No formal certification; requires audits, representative for foreign entities. (178 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	DORA	PIPL
Scope	Digital operational resilience in finance	Personal information protection and privacy
Industry	EU financial entities and ICT providers	All organizations handling Chinese residents' data
Nature	Mandatory EU regulation with ESAs enforcement	Mandatory Chinese law with CAC enforcement
Testing	Annual basic tests, triennial TLPT	PIPIA for high-risk processing, regular audits
Penalties	Up to 2% global turnover fines	Up to 5% annual revenue or RMB 50M

Scope

DORA

Digital operational resilience in finance

PIPL

Personal information protection and privacy

Industry

DORA

EU financial entities and ICT providers

PIPL

All organizations handling Chinese residents' data

Nature

DORA

Mandatory EU regulation with ESAs enforcement

PIPL

Mandatory Chinese law with CAC enforcement

Testing

DORA

Annual basic tests, triennial TLPT

PIPL

PIPIA for high-risk processing, regular audits

Penalties

DORA

Up to 2% global turnover fines

PIPL

Up to 5% annual revenue or RMB 50M

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about DORA and PIPL

DORA FAQ

PIPL FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 10 Reasons CMMC Level 3 Certification Unlocks Competitive Edge for Primes Handling Critical DoD Programs

Discover top 10 reasons CMMC Level 3 certification unlocks competitive edge for DoD primes. Reduced APT risks, procurement prefs, NIST 800-172 compliance via v2

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence

The DORA 'Hot Seat' Blueprint: Preparing Leadership and the Management Body for Regulatory Interviews

Prepare your Board & Management Body for DORA audits. Master the human element: demonstrate active oversight & accountability in regulatory interviews. Get the

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

NIS2 vs TISAX

Discover NIS2 vs TISAX: EU directive's broad scopes, 24/72hr reporting & 2% fines vs automotive ISO 27001-based assessments & prototype protection. Align now!

APPI vs 23 NYCRR 500

Discover APPI vs 23 NYCRR 500: Japan's privacy law meets NYDFS cybersecurity rules. Uncover key differences, compliance strategies & pitfalls for financial firms. Master both now!

Six Sigma vs GLBA

Discover Six Sigma vs GLBA: data-driven process excellence meets financial privacy compliance. Compare DMAIC belts, safeguards rules—boost quality & security now! (152)

DORA

PIPL

Quick Verdict

DORA

Key Features

PIPL

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

DORA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

PIPL Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

DORA FAQ

What is the primary objective of DORA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with DORA?

Does DORA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for DORA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with DORA?

Can DORA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing DORA?

PIPL FAQ

What is the primary objective of PIPL?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with PIPL?

Does PIPL require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for PIPL be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with PIPL?

An PIPL be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing PIPL?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 10 Reasons CMMC Level 3 Certification Unlocks Competitive Edge for Primes Handling Critical DoD Programs

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

The DORA 'Hot Seat' Blueprint: Preparing Leadership and the Management Body for Regulatory Interviews

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

NIS2 vs TISAX

APPI vs 23 NYCRR 500

Six Sigma vs GLBA