What is the primary objective of **EMAS**?

**The primary objective of EMAS is to promote continuous improvement in organisations' environmental performance through structured environmental management systems, systematic evaluation, public information provision, stakeholder dialogue, and active employee involvement.** As defined in Article 1 of **Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009** (EMAS III), it requires implementation of an EMS aligned with Annex II, periodic performance audits, validated environmental statements per Annex IV, and verified legal compliance, distinguishing it by mandating measurable outcomes in core indicators like energy, emissions, water, waste, materials, and biodiversity.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **EMAS**?

**No organisation is legally required to comply with EMAS, as it is a voluntary scheme open to any organisation, public or private, in any sector within or outside the EU.** Governed by **Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009**, participation is optional but binding upon registration with a national Competent Body; it targets entities seeking verified transparency, with 4,141 registered organisations and 16,154 sites as of September 2025, particularly in waste (655 organisations), public authorities, and SMEs using derogations under Article 7.

Does **EMAS** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, EMAS mandates independent verification and validation by accredited or licensed environmental verifiers, but registration—not certification—is awarded by national Competent Bodies.** Per Articles 18–23 and Annex VII, verifiers confirm EMS conformity (Annex II), internal audits (Annex III), legal compliance, and validate the public environmental statement (Annex IV), with full verification every three years (extendable to four for small organisations under Article 7).

How often should an assessment for **EMAS** be performed?

**EMAS requires full verification of the EMS and internal audit programme at least every three years, with annual validation of updated environmental statements.** Article 6 mandates validated statements publicly accessible within one month of renewal; intervening years require internal audits and unvalidated updates to Competent Bodies, with small organisation derogations allowing up to four-year full verification and two-year statement validation if low-risk conditions per Article 7 are met.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **EMAS**?

**Non-compliance with EMAS leads to suspension or deletion from the register by the national Competent Body, loss of EMAS logo use, and potential reputational damage.** Under Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 Articles 28–30, failure to submit validated statements, demonstrate legal compliance (Article 4), or resolve verifier findings triggers these actions; no direct fines apply to the voluntary scheme, but underlying environmental law breaches remain enforceable separately.

Can **EMAS** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**EMAS fully incorporates ISO 14001 EMS requirements in Annex II, enabling straightforward mapping and combined audits for ISO-certified organisations.** EMAS extends ISO with verified legal compliance, public statements (Annex IV), initial reviews (Annex I), and performance indicators, allowing ISO as a foundation while adding EU-specific transparency; Article 45 permits Competent Bodies to recognise equivalent national schemes like Norway’s Eco-Lighthouse for partial alignment.

What is the first step to begin implementing **EMAS**?

**The first step to implement EMAS is conducting an initial environmental review per Article 4 and Annex I.** This comprehensive baseline analysis identifies direct/indirect aspects, legal obligations, performance data, and significance criteria, forming the foundation for the EMS, policy, and statement; it must precede EMS development and verifier engagement for registration eligibility.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 19600**?

**ISO 19600 provides guidelines for establishing, developing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving an effective Compliance Management System (CMS).** Published in 2014 as a Type B guidance standard, it applies to all organization sizes and sectors using a risk-based approach structured around ten clauses in Annex SL format, emphasizing principles of **good governance**, **proportionality**, **transparency**, and **sustainability**. The CMS integrates compliance obligations—legal requirements, voluntary commitments, and internal policies—into a PDCA cycle for ongoing risk identification, controls, monitoring, and continual improvement.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 19600**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 19600, as it is a non-mandatory Type B guidance standard.** It is professionally relevant to any entity facing statutory, regulatory, contractual, or internal policy obligations, including financial services, manufacturing, healthcare, technology, public sector, SMEs, and startups. Stakeholders such as Chief Compliance Officers, boards, and risk committees use it to benchmark CMS alignment, demonstrate governance to regulators, and integrate with existing processes without formal certification.

Does **ISO 19600** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 19600 does not require external audits or third-party certification, being a Type B guidance document rather than a certifiable Type A standard.** Organizations conduct internal audits per ISO 19011, self-assessments, and management reviews (Clause 9) to evaluate CMS effectiveness. Alignment is demonstrated through internal benchmarking, documented evidence, and reporting to regulators or partners; it was withdrawn in 2021 and replaced by certifiable ISO 37301.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 19600** be performed?

**ISO 19600 assessments should be performed at planned intervals, with continual monitoring, periodic internal audits, and management reviews.** Clause 9 requires ongoing evaluation of CMS performance via Key Compliance Indicators (KCIs), risk reassessments triggered by changes (e.g., new obligations, incidents), quarterly management reviews (Clause 9.3), and annual internal audits. Horizon scanning ensures obligations and risks are updated dynamically, aligning with PDCA for continual improvement.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 19600**?

**There are no direct consequences for non-compliance with ISO 19600 itself, as it imposes no mandatory requirements.** However, lacking a structured CMS increases exposure to legal penalties, fines, operational disruptions, reputational damage, and higher insurance costs from unmet obligations. Regulators may reference CMS absence when determining penalties, emphasizing its role in demonstrating due diligence and good governance.

An **ISO 19600** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 19600 can be mapped to other international frameworks due to its Annex SL high-level structure and PDCA model.** Its clauses (context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement) integrate with existing management systems, enabling reuse of processes, documentation, and risk registers for efficiency. This supports benchmarking and transition to successors like ISO 37301 with minimal rework.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 19600**?

**The first step to implement ISO 19600 is securing leadership commitment and establishing governance (Phase 0, Clause 5).** Obtain top-management endorsement via a board resolution or commitment charter, appoint a Compliance Steering Committee, and define CMS scope considering organizational context and interested parties (Clause 4). This ensures proportionality and cross-functional oversight before gap analysis and risk assessment.

EMAS vs ISO 19600

Standards Comparison

EMAS

Voluntary

1993

EU voluntary scheme for environmental management and audit

ISO 19600

Voluntary

2014

Guidelines for compliance management systems

Quick Verdict

EMAS drives verified environmental performance via EU regulation and public statements for EU organizations seeking transparency, while ISO 19600 provides flexible CMS guidelines for global compliance risk management without certification.

Environmental Management

EMAS

Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 (EMAS III)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Mandatory validated public environmental statement
Verified legal compliance with environmental laws
Core environmental performance indicators required
Independent verifier validation and registration
Continuous improvement in environmental performance

Compliance Management

ISO 19600

ISO 19600:2014 Compliance management systems — Guidelines

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Risk-based CMS framework
Good governance principles
Annex SL structure integration
Proportionality and scalability
PDCA continual improvement cycle

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

EMAS Details

What It Is

EMAS (Eco-Management and Audit Scheme) is EU Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009, a voluntary environmental management framework. It promotes continuous improvement in environmental performance through structured EMS, evaluation, reporting, and stakeholder dialogue. Built on ISO 14001 principles with PDCA cycle, it emphasizes verified compliance and transparency.

Key Components

Initial environmental review of direct/indirect aspects
Environmental policy, objectives, targets, and programmes
EMS implementation, internal audits, management review
**Core indicatorsenergy, materials, water, waste, emissions, biodiversity
Annual validated public environmental statement (Annex IV)
Independent verifier validation and Competent Body registration

Why Organizations Use It

Demonstrates credible environmental leadership and performance
Verified legal compliance reduces regulatory risks
Enhances procurement advantages and stakeholder trust
Supports ESG/CSRD reporting synergies
Drives efficiency gains in resources and operations

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: gap analysis, EMS design, operational rollout, verification. Applies to all sectors/sizes via national Competent Bodies. Requires accredited verifiers; SMEs get derogations. Typical timeline 12-18 months with ongoing annual validation.

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

ISO 19600:2014 is an International Organization for Standardization (ISO) guideline (Type B standard) titled Compliance management systems — Guidelines. Its primary purpose is to provide recommendations for establishing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving a Compliance Management System (CMS). It adopts a risk-based approach structured around Annex SL with ten clauses, focusing on all organization sizes and sectors.

Key Components

Core principles: good governance, proportionality, transparency, sustainability.
Main areas: context analysis, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
PDCA cycle for continual enhancement.
No mandatory requirements; used for internal benchmarking, not certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Mitigates legal, regulatory, reputational risks.
Enhances operational efficiency, decision-making.
Builds stakeholder trust, market access.
Prepares for ISO 37301 transition.
Transforms compliance into strategic asset.

Implementation Overview

Phased roadmap: leadership commitment, gap analysis, design, deployment, continuous improvement.
Applicable to all sizes, industries, geographies.
Scalable, integrates with ISO 9001, 14001; no formal certification.

Key Differences

Aspect	EMAS	ISO 19600
Scope	Environmental performance management and reporting	General compliance management systems
Industry	All EU sectors, voluntary environmental focus	All industries worldwide, compliance obligations
Nature	EU Regulation, voluntary but binding once registered	ISO guidelines, non-certifiable (withdrawn 2021)
Testing	Independent verifier audits, annual statements	Internal audits, management reviews, no certification
Penalties	Registration suspension/deletion for non-compliance	No formal penalties, internal governance only

Scope

EMAS

Environmental performance management and reporting

ISO 19600

General compliance management systems

Industry

EMAS

All EU sectors, voluntary environmental focus

ISO 19600

All industries worldwide, compliance obligations

Nature

EMAS

EU Regulation, voluntary but binding once registered

ISO 19600

ISO guidelines, non-certifiable (withdrawn 2021)

Testing

EMAS

Independent verifier audits, annual statements

ISO 19600

Internal audits, management reviews, no certification

Penalties

EMAS

Registration suspension/deletion for non-compliance

ISO 19600

No formal penalties, internal governance only

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about EMAS and ISO 19600

EMAS FAQ

ISO 19600 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Image this: What if GDPR would have NOT been implemented by the EU

What if the EU never implemented GDPR? Explore this hypothetical: consumer data protection in Dec 2025, key differences, pros/cons for users & companies. Read t

ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Extending Your ISMS to PIMS in 12 Months or Less

Extend ISO 27001 ISMS to ISO 27701 PIMS in 12 months with our phased roadmap. Templates, checklists & infographics for RoPA, DSARs & audit-ready privacy complia

NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions

Unpack NIST CSF 2.0's enhanced Core Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. Get SME playbooks, governance shifts & strategies for cyber

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

HITRUST CSF vs ISO 55001

Compare HITRUST CSF vs ISO 55001: cybersecurity framework meets asset management system. Uncover key differences, compliance benefits, and select the ideal standard for your risks now.

ITIL vs CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)

ITIL vs CSL (Cyber Security Law of China): Compare ITSM best practices with strict data localization & security rules. Achieve compliance & efficiency now!

HIPAA vs WCAG

Discover HIPAA vs WCAG: Compare health data privacy/security rules with web accessibility standards. Master compliant patient portals—boost security, inclusion & avoid fines now.

EMAS

ISO 19600

Quick Verdict

EMAS

Key Features

ISO 19600

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

EMAS Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

EMAS FAQ

What is the primary objective of EMAS?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with EMAS?

Does EMAS require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for EMAS be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with EMAS?

Can EMAS be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing EMAS?

ISO 19600 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 19600?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 19600?

Does ISO 19600 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 19600 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 19600?

An ISO 19600 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 19600?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Image this: What if GDPR would have NOT been implemented by the EU

ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Extending Your ISMS to PIMS in 12 Months or Less

NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

HITRUST CSF vs ISO 55001

ITIL vs CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)

HIPAA vs WCAG