EN 1090
European standard for steel/aluminium structures execution and conformity
ISO 41001
International standard for facility management systems
Quick Verdict
EN 1090 mandates CE marking for structural steel/aluminium via FPC and execution classes, enabling EU market access. ISO 41001 provides voluntary FM system certification for efficient facility service delivery. Fabricators need EN 1090 for compliance; FM organizations adopt ISO 41001 for strategic alignment and sustainability.
EN 1090
EN 1090 Execution of steel and aluminium structures
Key Features
- Harmonized standard enabling mandatory CE marking
- Risk-based Execution Classes EXC1-EXC4
- Certified Factory Production Control system
- Welding quality management via ISO 3834
- Full material traceability and NDT inspection
ISO 41001
ISO 41001:2018 Facility management — Management systems — Requirements
Key Features
- High-Level Structure for IMS integration
- FM-demand organization alignment requirements
- Stakeholder requirements lifecycle management
- Risk planning includes continuity preparedness
- Operational service integration and coordination
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
EN 1090 Details
What It Is
EN 1090 is the European harmonized standard family for execution of steel and aluminium structures, comprising EN 1090-1 (conformity assessment), EN 1090-2 (steel) and EN 1090-3 (aluminium). It implements CPR requirements for CE marking of load-bearing components. Primary purpose: ensure controlled fabrication, assembly and performance declaration. Key approach: risk-based via Execution Classes (EXC1-EXC4) linking consequence, service and production categories.
Key Components
- **Factory Production Control (FPC)documented system for traceability, inspection, welding.
- Welding coordination per ISO 3834 levels.
- Technical rules for materials, tolerances, corrosion, NDT.
- AVCP systems with Notified Body certification and surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for EU market access; reduces liability, rework via disciplined processes. Builds trust, enables high-risk projects (EXC3/4). Strategic: differentiates in tenders, integrates with Eurocodes.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, FPC build, personnel training, NB certification (3-12 months). Applies to fabricators in construction; requires audits, ongoing surveillance.
ISO 41001 Details
What It Is
ISO 41001:2018 — Facility management — Management systems — Requirements with guidance for use — is a certifiable international standard for facility management (FM) systems. It specifies requirements to demonstrate effective, efficient FM delivery supporting demand organization objectives, stakeholder needs, and sustainability in competitive environments. Employs PDCA cycle and High-Level Structure (HLS) for interoperability.
Key Components
- Clauses 4–10: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- FM-specific: stakeholder mapping/lifecycle (4.2), service integration (8.3), outsourcing controls.
- ~100 requirements; built on process approach.
- Third-party certification via accredited bodies.
Why Organizations Use It
- Aligns FM strategically, reduces costs/risks (e.g., continuity, climate via 2024 Amendment).
- Meets compliance, enhances ESG, wins tenders.
- Boosts efficiency, occupant satisfaction, reputation.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, policy/objectives, processes/tools (CMMS), audits, certification.
- All sizes/sectors; 12–18 months typical; internal audits essential.
Key Differences
| Aspect | EN 1090 | ISO 41001 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Execution and conformity of steel/aluminium structures | Facility management systems for service delivery |
| Industry | Construction, steel/aluminium fabrication, EU-focused | All sectors, global facility management organizations |
| Nature | Harmonized standard enabling mandatory CE marking | Voluntary certifiable management system standard |
| Testing | FPC certification, ITT/ITC, notified body surveillance | Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits |
| Penalties | Market exclusion, legal liability without CE marking | Loss of certification, no direct legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about EN 1090 and ISO 41001
EN 1090 FAQ
ISO 41001 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
CIS Controls v8.1 Metrics That Matter: KPIs, KRIs, and Dashboards for Board-Ready Cyber Reporting
Quantify CIS Controls v8.1 success with KPIs, KRIs & dashboards. Learn what to measure, calculations, and executive presentations linking security to business r
SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond
Decode AICPA Trust Services Criteria from auditor jargon to plain English with side-by-side tables, analogies & TL;DRs. CISOs & founders: implement SOC 2 contro
NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity
Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
SAFe vs FSSC 22000
SAFe vs FSSC 22000: Agile scaling framework for IT meets GFSI food safety cert. Compare principles, configs, compliance & ROI—choose your enterprise edge now.
ENERGY STAR vs NIST 800-53
Discover ENERGY STAR vs NIST 800-53: Compare energy efficiency benchmarks with cybersecurity controls. Achieve compliance, cut costs, and enhance resilience. Dive in today!
ISO 27032 vs HITRUST CSF
Compare ISO 27032 vs HITRUST CSF: cybersecurity guidelines for Internet threats vs certifiable controls for compliance. Uncover differences, benefits & choose the right framework now.