ENERGY STAR
U.S. voluntary program for energy-efficient products and buildings
23 NYCRR 500
NY regulation for financial services cybersecurity compliance
Quick Verdict
ENERGY STAR drives voluntary energy efficiency certification for products and buildings nationwide, cutting costs and emissions. 23 NYCRR 500 mandates cybersecurity for NY financial entities, enforcing governance and controls to protect data. Companies adopt ENERGY STAR for savings/recognition; Part 500 to avoid fines.
ENERGY STAR
EPA ENERGY STAR Program
Key Features
- Mandates third-party certification by EPA-recognized bodies
- Sets category-specific efficiency thresholds above federal minimums
- Requires annual post-market verification testing (5-20%)
- Uses Portfolio Manager for 1-100 building scores
- Enforces strict brand governance and mark usage
23 NYCRR 500
23 NYCRR Part 500 Cybersecurity Regulation
Key Features
- CEO/CISO dual-signature annual compliance certification
- 72-hour cybersecurity incident notification to NYDFS
- Phishing-resistant MFA for privileged and remote access
- Risk-based third-party service provider oversight
- Annual penetration testing and vulnerability assessments
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ENERGY STAR Details
What It Is
ENERGY STAR is the U.S. EPA's voluntary labeling and benchmarking program for superior energy performance. It covers products, new homes, existing commercial buildings, and industrial plants. Primary purpose is to drive market transformation toward efficiency, reducing costs and emissions via trusted signals. Key approach uses category-specific performance thresholds, standardized tests, and independent verification.
Key Components
- Performance thresholds (e.g., 15% above federal mins for appliances; 75+ score for buildings)
- Standardized DOE test procedures (e.g., EER/IEER for HVAC)
- Third-party certification by EPA-recognized labs/CBs
- Ongoing verification (5-20% annual testing)
- Portfolio Manager for benchmarking; strict brand governance Certification model requires partner agreement, data submission via QPX, and annual renewal for buildings.
Why Organizations Use It
Reduces energy costs ($500B saved since 1992), unlocks rebates/procurement, enhances reputation (90% consumer recognition). Voluntary but de facto standard for incentives; manages compliance risks via verified claims. Builds stakeholder trust, supports ESG/decarbonization.
Implementation Overview
Phased: assess gaps, test/design, certify/launch, verify continuously. Applies to manufacturers, builders, owners across sizes/industries in U.S./Canada. Requires lab testing, MESA partnership, annual shipment reporting; third-party audits/verification mandatory.
23 NYCRR 500 Details
What It Is
23 NYCRR Part 500 is the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) Cybersecurity Regulation, a state-level mandate for financial entities. It establishes minimum, risk-based cybersecurity requirements to protect nonpublic information (NPI) and information systems' confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Key Components
- 14 core requirements spanning governance (CISO appointment), policies, risk assessments, MFA, encryption, penetration testing, TPSP oversight, incident response, and annual certification.
- Built on risk assessment-centric architecture; Class A companies face enhanced controls like independent audits.
- Compliance via CEO/CISO dual-signature annual filing by April 15, with 5-year evidence retention.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for NY-licensed financial services to avoid multimillion-dollar fines (e.g., Robinhood $30M).
- Enhances resilience, reduces incident risk, builds stakeholder trust, and aligns with NIST CSF.
- Provides competitive edge through robust governance and vendor management.
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: gap analysis, risk assessment, control deployment (MFA, asset inventory), testing, evidence repository.
- Targets NY financial entities (banks, insurers); scalable by size/complexity.
- No universal certification; focuses on internal audits, documentation for NYDFS examinations. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | ENERGY STAR | 23 NYCRR 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Energy efficiency across products, buildings, plants | Cybersecurity for information systems and NPI |
| Industry | All sectors, US-focused, voluntary participation | NY financial services licensees, state-specific |
| Nature | Voluntary certification program, EPA/DOE backed | Mandatory regulation with enforcement penalties |
| Testing | Third-party lab testing, post-market verification | Annual pen testing, vulnerability assessments |
| Penalties | Delisting, label revocation, no fines | Fines, consent orders, license actions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ENERGY STAR and 23 NYCRR 500
ENERGY STAR FAQ
23 NYCRR 500 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)
Translate CIS Controls v8.1 to cloud-native: Kubernetes patterns for IAM, logging, vuln mgmt, hardening on AWS, Azure, GCP + IaC. Practical playbook for teams.
What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...
Explore a world without mandatory GDPR: How would organizations manage data? What data privacy regs would emerge? Uncover impacts on businesses and privacy laws
Top 5 Unseen Complexities Modern Compliance Software Effortlessly Manages
Uncover top 5 unseen complexities modern compliance software manages effortlessly—from sensitive data mapping to real-time regulatory shifts. Automate audits, i
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 37301 vs SOC 2
Compare ISO 37301 vs SOC 2: Certifiable CMS for compliance risks vs trust criteria for data security. Uncover differences, integrations & benefits. Choose wisely now!
FSSC 22000 vs AS9100
Compare FSSC 22000 vs AS9100: Food safety scheme vs aerospace QMS. Uncover key differences, implementation strategies & compliance benefits. Choose wisely for your industry. (152 characters)
TISAX vs CSA
TISAX vs CSA: Automotive cybersecurity standard (TISAX) vs safety mgmt frameworks (CSA Z1000/Z1002). Key diffs, compliance strategies, implementation guide. Secure your ops now!