ENERGY STAR
U.S. voluntary program for energy-efficient products and buildings
COPPA
U.S. regulation protecting children's online privacy under 13
Quick Verdict
ENERGY STAR drives voluntary energy efficiency certification for products and buildings, slashing costs and emissions. COPPA mandates parental consent for kids' online data. Companies adopt ENERGY STAR for savings and prestige; COPPA to avoid massive FTC fines.
ENERGY STAR
EPA ENERGY STAR Program
Key Features
- Mandatory third-party certification and verification
- Category-specific performance thresholds above federal minimums
- Standardized DOE test procedures for products
- Portfolio Manager benchmarking for buildings
- Strict brand governance and mark controls
COPPA
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)
Key Features
- Verifiable parental consent before collecting personal data
- Protects children under 13 on child-directed websites/apps
- Broad PII definition: IDs, geolocation, photos/videos/audio
- Requires privacy notices and parental data access rights
- FTC enforcement with up to $43,792 per-violation fines
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ENERGY STAR Details
What It Is
ENERGY STAR is the U.S. EPA's voluntary labeling and benchmarking program for superior energy efficiency. It covers products, homes, commercial buildings, and industrial plants using performance thresholds, standardized tests, and third-party verification to signal top-tier efficiency.
Key Components
- Category-specific specs with metrics like EER/IEER for HVAC, AFUE for furnaces
- Third-party certification via EPA-recognized labs/CBs and post-market verification (5-20% annually)
- Portfolio Manager for 1-100 building scores (75+ for certification)
- Rigorous brand governance with mark usage rules
Why Organizations Use It
Reduces energy costs ($500B saved since 1992), emissions (4B tons avoided), unlocks rebates/procurement; builds trust via credible label (90% recognition); supports ESG, regulatory compliance in benchmarking laws.
Implementation Overview
Phased: assess/gap analysis, test/certify, deploy/monitor, verify annually. Applies to manufacturers, builders, owners; requires labs, data submission, ongoing testing; third-party PE/RA verification for buildings.
COPPA Details
What It Is
The Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) is a U.S. federal regulation, enacted in 1998 and effective April 21, 2000. It protects children under 13 from unauthorized online collection of personal information by commercial websites, apps, and services directed at kids or with actual knowledge of users' age. Its control-based approach mandates parental oversight through verifiable consent mechanisms.
Key Components
- **Verifiable Parental Consent (VPC)Required before collection; 11+ methods like credit card or video verification.
- **Privacy NoticesDetailed policies on data practices.
- **Parental RightsAccess, review, deletion of child's data.
- **Data SecurityReasonable procedures; broad PII definition includes persistent IDs, geolocation, audio/video. Compliance via FTC safe harbors; no fixed control count but four core themes: scope, definitions, consent, enforcement.
Why Organizations Use It
- **Legal MandateFTC enforcement avoids $43,792 per-violation fines (e.g., YouTube $170M).
- **Risk ReductionMitigates data breach and reputation risks.
- **Parent TrustBuilds confidence in child-directed services.
- **Market EdgeEnables U.S. kids' content globally.
Implementation Overview
- Analyze audience for child-direction; develop policies, integrate VPC, minimize data.
- Activities: Age gates, audits, training; safe harbor participation.
- Applies to commercial operators worldwide targeting U.S. children; scalable for SMBs to enterprises. No certification, but FTC-approved programs.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ENERGY STAR | COPPA |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Energy efficiency in products, buildings, plants | Children's online personal data privacy |
| Industry | All sectors, U.S./Canada focus, any size | Online services/apps targeting kids, U.S. global |
| Nature | Voluntary certification program | Mandatory federal regulation |
| Testing | Third-party lab tests, annual verification | Verifiable parental consent mechanisms |
| Penalties | Delisting, no fines | $43,792 per violation fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ENERGY STAR and COPPA
ENERGY STAR FAQ
COPPA FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity
Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier

5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software turns evolving regulations into strategic advantage. Automate monitoring, cut 3x non-compliance costs, stay audit-rea

Real-World ISO 27701 Success: Synthesized Case Studies, Metrics, and Lessons for Privacy Resilience
Real-world ISO 27701 success from Tribeca, Kocho: DSAR efficiency gains, risk score reductions, certification ROI. Synthesized metrics prove privacy resilience
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 50001 vs CSA
ISO 50001 vs CSA: Compare energy management (ISO 50001: EnMS, PDCA, EnPIs) with safety standards (CSA Z1000/Z1002: hazards, risks). Boost efficiency, compliance. Choose wisely!
ENERGY STAR vs C-TPAT
Discover ENERGY STAR vs C-TPAT: energy efficiency certification meets supply chain security standards. Compare requirements, benefits & strategies. Optimize compliance now!
APRA CPS 234 vs SAMA CSF
Discover APRA CPS 234 vs SAMA CSF: Compare Australia's prudential security standard with Saudi's cyber framework. Master governance, controls & maturity for compliance. (152 characters)