ENERGY STAR
U.S. voluntary program certifying energy-efficient products, homes, buildings
FedRAMP
U.S. program standardizing federal cloud security assessments and authorizations
Quick Verdict
ENERGY STAR drives voluntary energy efficiency certification for products and buildings via third-party testing, saving costs and emissions. FedRAMP mandates rigorous cloud security assessments for federal use, enabling contracts. Companies adopt them for market access, savings, and compliance.
ENERGY STAR
U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR Program
Key Features
- Mandatory third-party certification and post-market verification
- Category-specific performance thresholds above federal minimums
- 1-100 ENERGY STAR score via Portfolio Manager benchmarking
- DOE standardized test procedures for consistent metrics
- Strict brand governance preventing label misuse
FedRAMP
Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program
Key Features
- Assess once, reuse across federal agencies model
- NIST SP 800-53 baselines at Low/Moderate/High levels
- Independent 3PAO security assessments required
- Continuous monitoring with monthly/annual reporting
- FedRAMP Marketplace for authorized CSP visibility
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ENERGY STAR Details
What It Is
ENERGY STAR is the U.S. EPA-administered voluntary labeling and benchmarking program for superior energy efficiency. It covers products, homes, commercial buildings, and industrial plants, using performance thresholds, standardized testing, and independent verification to signal top-tier efficiency.
Key Components
- Category-specific specs (e.g., 15% above federal minimums for appliances)
- Third-party certification via EPA-recognized labs/CBs
- Portfolio Manager for 1-100 building scores (75+ for certification)
- Ongoing verification testing (5-20% annually)
- Strict brand governance with mark usage rules
Why Organizations Use It
Reduces energy costs ($500B saved since 1992), emissions (4B tons avoided), unlocks rebates/procurement advantages, enhances reputation (90% consumer recognition), supports ESG goals.
Implementation Overview
Assess via Portfolio Manager, test/certify products or benchmark buildings, engage partners, prepare for verification. Applies to manufacturers, builders, owners across U.S.; annual recertification required.
FedRAMP Details
What It Is
FedRAMP (Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program) is a U.S. government-wide framework standardizing security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud services used by federal agencies. Its purpose is accelerating secure cloud adoption through reusable authorizations, using risk-based methodologies derived from NIST SP 800-53 controls mapped to FIPS 199 impact levels (Low, Moderate, High).
Key Components
- Baselines: ~156 (Low), 323 (Moderate), 410 (High) controls across 20 families, plus LI-SaaS subset
- Artifacts: SSP, SAR, POA&M, continuous monitoring reports
- Built on NIST standards; requires 3PAO assessments
- Agency/Program paths with Marketplace listing
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for federal cloud procurement, unlocking contracts
- Reduces duplication, enhances risk management
- Builds stakeholder trust, competitive differentiation
- Enables multi-agency reuse and security posture improvement
Implementation Overview
- Gap analysis, documentation, 3PAO assessment, remediation (10-19 months)
- Targets CSPs of all sizes; U.S.-focused
- No central certification; agency ATOs required
Key Differences
| Aspect | ENERGY STAR | FedRAMP |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Energy efficiency for products, buildings, plants | Cloud security assessment and authorization |
| Industry | All sectors, consumer/commercial, U.S.-focused | Cloud providers serving U.S. federal agencies |
| Nature | Voluntary labeling and benchmarking program | Mandatory standardized security authorization |
| Testing | Third-party labs, post-market verification (5-20%) | 3PAO assessments, continuous monitoring, annual reviews |
| Penalties | Delisting, label revocation, reputational loss | Authorization revocation, contract ineligibility |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ENERGY STAR and FedRAMP
ENERGY STAR FAQ
FedRAMP FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
SEC Cybersecurity Rules Materiality Determination Framework: Step-by-Step Guide with Checklists and Real-World Examples
Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 materiality determinations with our step-by-step framework, checklists, case law factors, and real-world examples. Avoid enforceme
From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day
Discover how compliance software automates monitoring, delivers real-time insights, and transforms compliance pros from reactive gatekeepers to proactive strate
NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions
Unpack NIST CSF 2.0's enhanced Core Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. Get SME playbooks, governance shifts & strategies for cyber
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
BREEAM vs IFS Food
Discover BREEAM vs IFS Food: Compare building sustainability certification with food safety standards. Gain insights on compliance, benefits & strategies to boost your projects. Explore now!
ISO 27701 vs MAS TRM
Compare ISO 27701 vs MAS TRM: Unpack privacy governance (ISO 27701) vs tech risk resilience (MAS TRM). Align standards for compliance & strategy. Discover now!
PIPEDA vs C-TPAT
Discover PIPEDA vs C-TPAT: Compare Canada's privacy law with US supply chain security. Key differences, compliance tips, and strategies for cross-border ops. Read now!