ENERGY STAR
U.S. voluntary program for energy efficiency labeling
ISO 30301
International standard for management systems for records
Quick Verdict
ENERGY STAR certifies energy-efficient products and buildings via testing and verification, cutting costs and emissions. ISO 30301 governs records management systems for compliance and accountability. Companies adopt ENERGY STAR for efficiency gains; ISO 30301 for defensible evidence and governance.
ENERGY STAR
EPA ENERGY STAR Program
Key Features
- Third-party certification and ongoing verification testing
- Category-specific efficiency thresholds above federal minimums
- Standardized DOE test procedures for consistency
- Portfolio Manager benchmarking with 75+ score threshold
- Strict brand governance preventing label misuse
ISO 30301
ISO 30301:2019 Management systems for records requirements
Key Features
- High-Level Structure for management system integration
- Normative Annex A records operational controls
- Explicit records requirements analysis (Clause 4.1.2)
- Risk-based planning and measurable objectives
- Flexible conformity pathways including certification
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ENERGY STAR Details
What It Is
ENERGY STAR is a U.S. EPA-administered voluntary labeling and benchmarking program, partnered with DOE. It promotes superior energy efficiency for products, homes, buildings, and plants. Primary purpose: overcome market barriers via trusted signals of top performance. Methodology: category-specific thresholds, standardized tests, independent verification.
Key Components
- Efficiency thresholds (e.g., 15%+ above federal standards)
- DOE test procedures (10 CFR referenced)
- Third-party certification by recognized labs/CBs
- Post-market verification (5-20% models annually)
- Portfolio Manager for 1-100 scores (75+ for certification) Built on performance tiers, verification regime; annual building recertification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Savings: 5T kWh, $500B costs, 4B tons GHG avoided
- Incentives, rebates, procurement advantages
- 90% consumer recognition for differentiation
- ESG, policy alignment (benchmarking laws)
- Risk reduction via credible label
Implementation Overview
Phased: assessment/gap analysis, testing/certification, deployment, ongoing verification. For manufacturers, owners, builders; U.S./Canada focus. Involves labs, documentation, training; third-party audits required.
ISO 30301 Details
What It Is
ISO 30301:2019 is an international certifiable standard titled Information and documentation — Management systems for records — Requirements. It specifies requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving a Management System for Records (MSR). The primary purpose is to ensure organizations create, control, and manage reliable evidence of business activities supporting mandate, mission, and goals. It uses a High-Level Structure (HLS) with risk-based thinking and PDCA cycle.
Key Components
- HLS clauses 4–10 covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- Clause 8 and Annex A (normative) for records lifecycle operational controls (creation, capture, access, retention, disposition).
- Core principles: authenticity, reliability, integrity, usability.
- Flexible conformity: self-declaration, external confirmation, third-party certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Strengthens compliance, auditability, transparency.
- Mitigates risks like evidence loss, regulatory sanctions.
- Improves efficiency, integrates with ISO 9001/27001.
- Builds stakeholder trust via governance and performance measurement.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, policy design, operational controls, audits.
- Applies to any organization/size/sector.
- Involves training, system integration, internal audits; certification optional via accredited bodies.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ENERGY STAR | ISO 30301 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Energy efficiency for products, buildings, plants | Records management systems and governance |
| Industry | All sectors, US-focused, any organization size | All industries worldwide, any organization size |
| Nature | Voluntary labeling and certification program | Voluntary certifiable management system standard |
| Testing | Third-party lab tests, post-market verification | Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits |
| Penalties | Delisting, label revocation, no legal fines | Loss of certification, no direct legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ENERGY STAR and ISO 30301
ENERGY STAR FAQ
ISO 30301 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows
Explore intuitive compliance software that automates workflows, simplifies onboarding, and reduces stress. Cut non-compliance costs 3x and boost efficiency for

Singapore PDPA Implementation Guide: Mastering Part 6A Breach Notification Thresholds and Timelines from Primary Statute
Master Singapore PDPA Part 6A breach notifications: statutory thresholds (risk of significant harm), 72-hour timelines, checklists, templates & frameworks. Comp

Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software
Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ITIL vs IATF 16949
ITIL vs IATF 16949: ITIL's flexible ITSM practices (SVS, 34 tools) vs IATF's rigorous automotive QMS (core tools like APQP/FMEA). Align IT or manufacturing for peak efficiency—compare now!
GLBA vs ISO 30301
Compare GLBA vs ISO 30301: Decode financial privacy rules & records systems for compliance mastery. Safeguard data, cut risks—unlock strategies today!
COBIT vs ISO 27018
Compare COBIT vs ISO 27018: ISACA's enterprise IT governance powerhouse vs cloud PII privacy code. Tailor risk, value & compliance—discover the best fit now!