ENERGY STAR
U.S. voluntary program for energy efficiency labeling
ISO 37301
International standard for certifiable compliance management systems.
Quick Verdict
ENERGY STAR drives energy efficiency certification for products and buildings via benchmarking and testing, while ISO 37301 establishes certifiable compliance management systems for all obligations. Companies adopt ENERGY STAR for cost savings and market edge; ISO 37301 for risk mitigation and governance.
ENERGY STAR
EPA ENERGY STAR Program
Key Features
- Mandatory third-party certification and verification
- Category-specific performance thresholds above federal minimums
- Standardized DOE test procedures for consistent measurement
- Ongoing post-market verification testing (5-20% annually)
- Strict brand governance and mark usage rules
ISO 37301
ISO 37301:2021 Compliance management systems
Key Features
- Certifiable requirements replacing guidance-only ISO 19600
- HLS alignment for integration with ISO 9001/14001/27001
- Risk-based planning of compliance obligations and controls
- Mandatory confidential whistleblowing with anti-retaliation protections
- Leadership commitment and PDCA continual improvement
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ENERGY STAR Details
What It Is
ENERGY STAR is the EPA-administered voluntary labeling and benchmarking program for superior energy efficiency. It covers products, homes, commercial buildings, and industrial plants using category-specific performance thresholds, standardized testing, and independent verification to signal top-tier efficiency.
Key Components
- **Performance thresholdsAbove federal minimums (e.g., 15% better for refrigerators, specific EER/IEER/COP for HVAC).
- **Third-party certificationEPA-recognized labs and bodies, with QPX reporting.
- **Ongoing verification5-20% annual testing, disqualification for failures.
- **Portfolio ManagerBenchmarking tool for 1-100 scores (75+ for certification).
- **Brand governanceStrict mark usage via Brand Book.
Why Organizations Use It
Reduces energy costs ($500B saved since 1992), emissions (4B tons avoided), unlocks rebates/procurement. Builds trust (90% recognition), differentiates in markets, supports ESG. Voluntary yet de facto standard for incentives.
Implementation Overview
Phased: assess/gap analysis, design/testing/certification, deployment, ongoing verification. Applies to manufacturers, builders, owners across sizes/industries (U.S./Canada focus). Requires annual third-party verification for buildings/plants.
ISO 37301 Details
What It Is
ISO 37301:2021, officially "Compliance management systems – Requirements with guidance for use," is a certifiable international standard for Compliance Management Systems (CMS). It specifies auditable requirements to establish, implement, maintain, and improve CMS using a risk-based Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle and ISO High-Level Structure (HLS) for integration.
Key Components
- **Leadership and cultureTop management commitment, policy, roles.
- **PlanningCompliance obligations, risk assessment, objectives.
- **SupportResources, competence (ISO 37303), awareness, whistleblowing (ISO 37002).
- **OperationControls, third-party management.
- **EvaluationMonitoring, audits, management reviews (ISO 37302).
- **ImprovementNonconformities, continual enhancement. Supports certification via accredited bodies like ANAB.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates regulatory, reputational risks; reduces fines.
- Builds stakeholder trust, investor confidence.
- Enables IMS integration, ESG alignment (SDGs 8,16).
- Provides competitive edge through certification.
Implementation Overview
Phased: context analysis, risk planning, controls, training, audits. Scalable for all sizes/sectors; 3-year certification cycle with surveillance audits. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | ENERGY STAR | ISO 37301 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Energy efficiency in products, buildings, plants | All compliance obligations, risks, management systems |
| Industry | All sectors, US-focused, any organization size | All sectors globally, any organization size |
| Nature | Voluntary labeling/benchmarking program | Certifiable management system standard |
| Testing | Third-party lab tests, verification, Portfolio Manager | Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits |
| Penalties | Delisting, label removal, no legal fines | No legal penalties, loss of certification |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ENERGY STAR and ISO 37301
ENERGY STAR FAQ
ISO 37301 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Decoding Tomorrow's Regulations: How Advanced Compliance Tools Predict and Prepare for Future Shifts
Advanced compliance tools use AI, analytics & real-time monitoring to predict regulatory shifts, cut non-compliance costs 3x, and ensure audit readiness. Stay p

Singapore PDPA Implementation Guide: Mastering Part 6A Breach Notification Thresholds and Timelines from Primary Statute
Master Singapore PDPA Part 6A breach notifications: statutory thresholds (risk of significant harm), 72-hour timelines, checklists, templates & frameworks. Comp

Beyond the Boardroom: 5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Elevates Every Department
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software boosts HR, IT, finance & more: automate risks, enhance efficiency, ensure data integrity, stay audit-ready. Elevate y
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
RoHS vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Compare RoHS vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules: EU hazardous substance limits meet SEC's 4-day incident disclosures. Expert guide to compliance strategies for global execs. Dive in!
EU AI Act vs CIS Controls
Compare EU AI Act vs CIS Controls: Decode AI risk tiers, prohibitions & cyber hygiene safeguards. Bridge compliance gaps for high-risk systems & enterprise security. Align now!
NIST 800-53 vs ISO 17025
Compare NIST 800-53 vs ISO 17025: Security baselines meet lab competence standards. Unlock risk management, controls, and accreditation insights for optimal compliance. Dive in now!