What is the primary objective of **EPA**?

**The primary objective of EPA standards is to protect human health and the environment through enforceable regulations under statutes like the Clean Air Act (CAA), Clean Water Act (CWA), and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).** Codified in **40 CFR**, these standards establish numeric limits (e.g., NAAQS under CAA), technology-based controls (e.g., effluent guidelines, MACT), permitting (NPDES, Title V), monitoring, and reporting to prevent pollution across air, water, and waste media.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **EPA**?

**All point source dischargers, major stationary air sources, hazardous waste generators, and TSDF operators are legally required to comply with applicable EPA standards.** Applicability triggers include thresholds like ≥10 tpy single HAP or ≥25 tpy combined HAP for CAA major sources, hazardous waste organic concentrations ≥500 ppmw under RCRA Subpart CC, and industrial wastewater dischargers under CWA effluent guidelines; states implement via permits with EPA oversight.

Does **EPA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, EPA standards do not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** Compliance is demonstrated through self-monitoring, recordkeeping (e.g., 3-year retention), and reporting (e.g., DMRs, Title V deviations); EPA verifies via inspections using protocols like NPDES Compliance Inspection Manual, with no ISO-style certification required.

How often should an assessment for **EPA** be performed?

**EPA assessments should be performed continuously via daily/periodic monitoring, with formal internal audits at least annually and permit renewals every 5 years.** RCRA Subparts AA/BB/CC require daily equipment checks, annual closed-vent inspections, and semiannual reporting; NPDES mandates monthly/quarterly DMRs per permit schedules.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **EPA**?

**Non-compliance with EPA standards triggers civil penalties (strict liability, up to statutory maximums per day), injunctive relief, and potential criminal prosecution for knowing violations.** Enforcement follows inspection/investigation, often settling with penalties removing economic benefit, SEPs, and remediation; examples include multi-million-dollar CAA/CWA settlements.

Can **EPA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**No, this FAQ addresses EPA standards independently as U.S.-specific requirements under 40 CFR.** Mapping to other frameworks is outside scope; focus on statutory compliance via permits and e-CFR.

What is the first step to begin implementing **EPA**?

**The first step to implement EPA standards is compiling a facility-specific regulatory register of applicable statutes, 40 CFR parts, and permits.** Conduct a baseline audit using EPA protocols (e.g., RCRA TSDF checklist) to identify gaps in monitoring, records, and controls.

What is the primary objective of **APRA CPS 234**?

**APRA CPS 234 requires regulated entities to maintain an information security capability commensurate with threats and vulnerabilities to their information assets.** This ensures the continued sound operation of the entity by minimising the likelihood and impact of information security incidents on confidentiality, integrity, or availability, including assets managed by related parties or third parties (paragraphs 1, 15-16).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **APRA CPS 234**?

**APRA CPS 234 applies to all APRA-regulated entities, including authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs), general insurers, life companies, private health insurers, and RSE licensees.** It extends group-wide where the entity is the Head of a group, covering non-regulated group entities, and to Australian operations of foreign ADIs, Category C insurers, and eligible foreign life companies (paragraphs 2-4).

Does **APRA CPS 234** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**APRA CPS 234 does not mandate external audit or third-party certification.** It requires internal audit to review the design and operating effectiveness of information security controls, including those of third parties, using appropriately skilled personnel; reliance on third-party assurance must be assessed by internal audit for material assets (paragraphs 32-34).

How often should an assessment for **APRA CPS 234** be performed?

**APRA CPS 234 requires the testing program to be reviewed at least annually, or upon material change to information assets or the business environment.** Systematic testing of control effectiveness must occur with frequency commensurate with threats, asset criticality, sensitivity, and change rates (paragraphs 27, 31).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **APRA CPS 234**?

**Non-compliance with APRA CPS 234 exposes entities to APRA's prudential powers, including remediation directions, enforcement notices, penalties, and heightened supervision.** It risks operational disruptions, loss of license, litigation, reputational damage, and failure to notify material incidents within 72 hours or control weaknesses within 10 business days (paragraphs 35-36).

Can **APRA CPS 234** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, APRA CPS 234's outcomes-based requirements for governance, controls, testing, and incident response align with frameworks like ISO 27001 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework.** Entities commonly map its commensurate capability, policy, and assurance elements to these for operationalisation, though CPS 234 uniquely mandates Board accountability and strict APRA notifications (paragraphs 13, 35-36).

What is the first step to begin implementing **APRA CPS 234**?

**The first step is to secure Board approval and mandate for the program, establishing explicit oversight of information security.** The Board is ultimately responsible (paragraph 13); conduct baseline scoping of entities, assets, and third-party arrangements, followed by gap analysis against CPS 234 clauses.

EPA vs APRA CPS 234

Standards Comparison

EPA

Mandatory

1970

U.S. federal regulations for environmental protection

APRA CPS 234

Mandatory

2019

Australian prudential standard for information security resilience

Quick Verdict

EPA enforces environmental standards across US industries via permits and monitoring, while APRA CPS 234 mandates information security governance for Australian financial entities with board accountability and cyber testing. Organizations adopt them for legal compliance and operational resilience.

Air Quality

EPA

U.S. EPA Standards (40 CFR, CAA/CWA/RCRA)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Hybrid technology- and health-based standards architecture
Evidence-driven compliance via monitoring and reporting
Facility-specific permits with federal-state implementation
Predictable enforcement pipelines and penalty structures
Dynamic evolution through public rulemaking processes

Information Security

APRA CPS 234

APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Board ultimate responsibility for information security
Commensurate capability with threats and vulnerabilities
Systematic testing and independent assurance required
72-hour notification for material incidents to APRA
Third-party asset management obligations included

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

EPA Details

What It Is

EPA standards are legally binding regulations implementing major U.S. environmental statutes like Clean Air Act (CAA), Clean Water Act (CWA), and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), codified in Title 40 CFR. They form a regulatory framework for air, water, and waste protection, using a multi-layered, risk-based approach blending technology performance, health endpoints, and site-specific permitting.

Key Components

Numeric limits, thresholds, and work practices across media.
Permitting (NPDES, Title V), monitoring, recordkeeping, reporting.
Enforcement with civil penalties, settlements, SEPs.
Federal-state delegation with national baselines. Compliance via evidence regimes like DMRs, QA/QC.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for regulated entities to avoid fines, shutdowns, liabilities. Drives risk reduction, operational efficiency, ESG alignment. Builds stakeholder trust, prevents reputational harm from incidents.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, EMS build, controls deployment, audits. Applies to industrial facilities nationwide; high complexity due to state variability. No central certification; audited via inspections, ECHO data.

APRA CPS 234 Details

What It Is

APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding prudential regulation issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, effective 1 July 2019. It mandates APRA-regulated entities, including banks, insurers, and superannuation funds, to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats and vulnerabilities. The approach is risk-based, emphasizing proportionality to asset criticality and sensitivity.

Key Components

Governance with Board ultimate responsibility (paragraph 13).
Policy framework, asset classification, and lifecycle controls (paragraphs 18-22).
Incident response plans, systematic testing, and internal audit assurance (paragraphs 23-34).
Strict notifications: 72 hours for material incidents, 10 business days for control weaknesses (paragraphs 35-36). No fixed control count; focuses on outcomes with third-party extensions.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory compliance for APRA entities to avoid penalties, directions, and scrutiny.
Enhances operational resilience, customer trust, and competitive edge.
Mitigates cyber risks, reduces incident impacts, and supports partnerships.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, governance design, control implementation, testing, and monitoring. Applies to all sizes in Australian finance; requires evidence-based assurance, no formal certification but APRA supervision.

Key Differences

Aspect	EPA	APRA CPS 234
Scope	Environmental pollution control across air/water/waste	Information security and cyber resilience
Industry	All industrial sectors nationwide (US)	Australian financial services (banks/insurers/super)
Nature	Mandatory federal environmental regulations	Mandatory prudential standard for regulated entities
Testing	Monitoring, sampling, self-reporting per permits	Systematic independent control testing annually
Penalties	Civil/criminal fines, injunctive relief, settlements	Supervisory actions, remediation orders, sanctions

Scope

EPA

Environmental pollution control across air/water/waste

APRA CPS 234

Information security and cyber resilience

Industry

EPA

All industrial sectors nationwide (US)

APRA CPS 234

Australian financial services (banks/insurers/super)

Nature

EPA

Mandatory federal environmental regulations

APRA CPS 234

Mandatory prudential standard for regulated entities

Testing

EPA

Monitoring, sampling, self-reporting per permits

APRA CPS 234

Systematic independent control testing annually

Penalties

EPA

Civil/criminal fines, injunctive relief, settlements

APRA CPS 234

Supervisory actions, remediation orders, sanctions

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about EPA and APRA CPS 234

EPA FAQ

APRA CPS 234 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: First 5 Steps to Ace Your Type 2 Audit with Infographic

Ace your SOC 2 Type 2 audit with the first 5 essential steps: evidence collection, auditor tips, red flags from SignWell's experience. Get checklists & infograp

Breaking Down NIST CSF 2.0 Structure: Core, Tiers, Profiles, and Real-World Application

Master NIST CSF 2.0 structure: Govern + 5 Core functions, Tiers (Partial-Adaptive), Profiles for gaps, and real-world apps. Build effective cyber risk strategie

Your Guide to Implementing PCI DSS in Your Organization

Step-by-step guide to implementing PCI DSS in your organization. Achieve compliance, protect cardholder data, and reduce risks. Start securing payments today!

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

EU AI Act vs MAS TRM

Compare EU AI Act vs MAS TRM: Key compliance diffs for AI in finance. Master risk tiers, governance, cybersecurity & phased rollout strategies. Boost resilience now!

WEEE vs ISO 14064

Discover WEEE vs ISO 14064: EU directive enforces e-waste collection, recycling targets; ISO standardizes GHG quantification & verification. Master compliance differences for sustainability success.

BRC vs IATF 16949

Discover BRC vs IATF 16949: Compare food safety (BRCGS) standards with automotive QMS for key clauses, audits & compliance. Choose the right certification for your industry success.

EPA

APRA CPS 234

Quick Verdict

EPA

Key Features

APRA CPS 234

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

EPA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

APRA CPS 234 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

EPA FAQ

What is the primary objective of EPA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with EPA?

Does EPA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for EPA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with EPA?

Can EPA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing EPA?

APRA CPS 234 FAQ

What is the primary objective of APRA CPS 234?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with APRA CPS 234?

Does APRA CPS 234 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for APRA CPS 234 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with APRA CPS 234?

Can APRA CPS 234 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing APRA CPS 234?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: First 5 Steps to Ace Your Type 2 Audit with Infographic

Breaking Down NIST CSF 2.0 Structure: Core, Tiers, Profiles, and Real-World Application

Your Guide to Implementing PCI DSS in Your Organization

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

EU AI Act vs MAS TRM

WEEE vs ISO 14064

BRC vs IATF 16949