Standards Comparison

    EPA

    Mandatory
    1970

    U.S. federal regulations for environmental protection compliance

    VS

    BRC

    Voluntary
    2022

    Global standard for food safety in manufacturing

    Quick Verdict

    EPA enforces mandatory environmental regulations for industrial compliance across air, water, waste. BRC provides voluntary food safety certification for manufacturers seeking retailer access. Companies adopt EPA to avoid penalties; BRC for market credibility and supply chain trust.

    Environmental Protection

    EPA

    Title 40 CFR - Protection of Environment

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Multi-layered standards under CAA, CWA, RCRA
    • Technology- and health-based performance requirements
    • Site-specific permitting from national baselines
    • Evidence-driven monitoring and reporting mandates
    • Predictable federal-state enforcement pathways
    Food Safety

    BRC

    BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • HACCP-based food safety plan with hazard analysis
    • Senior management commitment and culture plan
    • Fundamental requirements for traceability and allergens
    • Environmental monitoring and food defence controls
    • Graded certification via announced/unannounced audits

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    EPA Details

    What It Is

    EPA standards are a family of legally binding regulatory standards implementing major U.S. environmental statutes like CAA, CWA, and RCRA. Codified in Title 40 CFR, their primary purpose is protecting human health and the environment through enforceable performance limits across air, water, and waste media. They employ a systems architecture blending technology-based controls, health-based criteria, and risk management.

    Key Components

    • Statutory foundations defining mandates.
    • Numeric limits, thresholds, design standards in 40 CFR.
    • Permitting (NPDES, Title V), monitoring, recordkeeping, enforcement.
    • Core principles: uniform national baselines with site-specific tailoring; no single certification, but permit compliance and audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandatory for regulated entities to avoid civil/criminal penalties, operational shutdowns, and liabilities. Provides risk reduction, defensible data governance, enforcement predictability. Enhances ESG reputation, efficiency via BMPs, and adaptability to rulemakings.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: gap analysis, regulatory mapping, controls deployment, training, digital monitoring. Applies to U.S. industrial facilities; involves audits, state coordination, no formal certification but ongoing compliance verification.

    BRC Details

    What It Is

    BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety (Issue 9) is a GFSI-benchmarked certification framework for food manufacturers, processors, and packers. It ensures product safety, legality, authenticity, and quality through a structured management system combining senior management commitment, Codex HACCP-based food safety plans, and prerequisite programs (GMP/GHP).

    Key Components

    • **Seven core sectionsSenior Management, Food Safety Plan, FSQMS, Site Standards, Product Control, Process Control, Personnel.
    • Over 300 auditable requirements with fundamental clauses (e.g., HACCP, internal audits, traceability).
    • Built on risk-based hazard analysis including fraud, allergens, and food defence.
    • Grading model (AA/A/B/C/D) via announced/unannounced audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Retailer mandates for supply chain access.
    • Risk reduction against recalls from allergens, pathogens, labelling errors.
    • Regulatory alignment (e.g., FSMA) and due diligence.
    • Builds trust, efficiency, and competitive edge.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: gap analysis, documentation, training, internal audits, certification audit. Suited for food manufacturers globally; 6-12 months typical for mid-sized sites.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    EPA
    Environmental protection across air, water, waste
    BRC
    Food safety, quality, legality in manufacturing

    Industry

    EPA
    All industrial sectors, US-focused multi-state
    BRC
    Food, packaging, storage; global retailers

    Nature

    EPA
    Mandatory federal regulations with enforcement
    BRC
    Voluntary third-party certification standard

    Testing

    EPA
    Continuous monitoring, self-reporting, inspections
    BRC
    Annual on-site audits, internal verification

    Penalties

    EPA
    Civil/criminal fines, shutdowns, remediation
    BRC
    Certification loss, market access denial

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about EPA and BRC

    EPA FAQ

    BRC FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages