EPA
U.S. federal regulations protecting air, water, waste environments
CIS Controls
Prioritized cybersecurity framework for cyber resilience
Quick Verdict
EPA enforces mandatory environmental compliance via statutes like CAA/CWA/RCRA for all US industries, while CIS Controls provide voluntary cybersecurity best practices across 18 prioritized areas. Companies adopt EPA to avoid penalties; CIS to reduce cyber risks and meet frameworks.
EPA
40 CFR Title 40: Protection of Environment
Key Features
- 1. Interlocking statutes, 40 CFR regulations, site-specific permits
- 2. Evidence-driven compliance via monitoring, records, reporting
- 3. Hybrid technology-based and health-based standards
- 4. Layered federal-state implementation and oversight
- 5. Predictable enforcement with penalties and settlements
CIS Controls
CIS Critical Security Controls v8.1
Key Features
- 18 prioritized controls with 153 actionable safeguards
- Implementation Groups IG1-IG3 for scalable adoption
- Asset inventory and continuous vulnerability management focus
- Maps to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA
- Technology-agnostic, community-driven best practices
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
EPA Details
What It Is
EPA standards are legally binding regulations by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, implementing statutes like Clean Air Act (CAA), Clean Water Act (CWA), and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Codified in 40 CFR Title 40, they establish frameworks for air, water, waste protection. Purpose: safeguard human health/environment via performance limits, permits, monitoring. Methodology: combines technology-based controls, health-based criteria, risk management.
Key Components
- Numeric limits/thresholds (emissions, discharges)
- Permitting mechanisms (NPDES, Title V, RCRA)
- Monitoring, recordkeeping, reporting (DMRs, QA/QC)
- Enforcement structures (civil penalties, SEPs) Built on statutory authority; no certification—compliance via inspections.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for regulated facilities to avoid multimillion penalties, shutdowns. Mitigates legal/reputational risks, ensures operational continuity, supports ESG goals, drives efficiency via BMPs.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, regulatory mapping, controls deployment, training, audits. Applies to industrial/manufacturing sectors nationwide; state variations. Verified through EPA/state inspections, ECHO data.
CIS Controls Details
What It Is
CIS Critical Security Controls (CIS Controls) v8.1 is a community-driven, prescriptive cybersecurity framework of prioritized best practices to reduce attack surfaces and enhance resilience. It applies across industries and organization sizes via Implementation Groups (IG1–IG3), focusing on actionable Safeguards derived from real-world threats.
Key Components
- 18 Controls across asset management, data protection, vulnerability management, incident response.
- 153 Safeguards grouped into IG1 (56 essentials), IG2, IG3 for scaling.
- Built on offense-informed principles; maps to NIST, ISO 27001, PCI DSS.
- No formal certification; compliance via self-assessment, audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates 85% of common attacks, cuts breach costs.
- Supports regulatory compliance (HIPAA, GDPR), cyber insurance.
- Drives efficiency, vendor trust, competitive edge.
Implementation Overview
- Phased roadmap: governance, discovery, foundational controls, expansion.
- Automation-heavy; suits SMBs to enterprises, all sectors.
- Metrics-driven; 9–18 months typical for IG2 stability.
Key Differences
| Aspect | EPA | CIS Controls |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Environmental regulations (air, water, waste) | Cybersecurity best practices (18 controls) |
| Industry | All industries, US-focused multi-sector | All industries worldwide, size-agnostic |
| Nature | Mandatory federal regulations, enforced legally | Voluntary cybersecurity framework |
| Testing | Inspections, monitoring, self-reporting required | Self-assessments, pen testing recommended |
| Penalties | Civil/criminal fines, injunctions, imprisonment | No legal penalties, reputation/insurance impact |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about EPA and CIS Controls
EPA FAQ
CIS Controls FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption
Bust 10 NIST CSF 2.0 myths like 'only for critical infrastructure' or 'Govern replaces Identify'. Plain-English breakdowns, evidence, and fixes for flexible ris
Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence
Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance
Top 5 Unseen Complexities Modern Compliance Software Effortlessly Manages
Uncover top 5 unseen complexities modern compliance software manages effortlessly—from sensitive data mapping to real-time regulatory shifts. Automate audits, i
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
CCPA vs Australian Privacy Act
CCPA vs Australian Privacy Act: Compare key rights, thresholds, enforcement & compliance. Unlock strategies to master global data privacy—read now!
C-TPAT vs ISO 19600
Compare C-TPAT vs ISO 19600: CBP's trusted trader security program for faster customs & reduced risks vs ISO's CMS guidelines for governance & compliance. Discover key diffs now!
FISMA vs TISAX
Discover FISMA vs TISAX: Federal cybersecurity law meets automotive supply chain standard. Unpack differences, strategies, pitfalls & benefits for compliance success. Secure now!