What is the primary objective of **EPA**?

**The primary objective of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is to protect human health and the environment by enforcing federal statutes like the Clean Air Act (CAA), Clean Water Act (CWA), and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).** These standards, codified in **40 CFR**, establish numeric limits, technology-based controls (e.g., NAAQS, effluent guidelines, RCRA Subparts AA/BB/CC), permitting (NPDES, Title V), monitoring, and enforcement to prevent pollution across air, water, and waste media.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **EPA**?

**Organizations operating point source discharges, major air emissions sources, or hazardous waste facilities are legally required to comply with EPA standards under CAA, CWA, and RCRA.** This includes industrial dischargers needing NPDES permits, major HAP sources (≥10 tpy single/≥25 tpy combined) under Title V/MACT, and hazardous waste generators/TSDFs subject to accumulation limits, manifesting, and air emission controls; states implement many programs with EPA oversight.

Does **EPA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**EPA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification for most standards but requires self-monitoring, recordkeeping, and state/federal inspections.** Compliance evidence via DMRs, CEMS data, and QA/QC under 40 CFR Part 136 is enforceable; voluntary EMS/ISO 14001 aids but TSDF protocols guide internal audits, with EPA inspections verifying performance.

How often should an assessment for **EPA** be performed?

**EPA assessments should be performed continuously via daily/periodic monitoring, with annual compliance certifications and audits per permit terms.** RCRA Subpart AA mandates daily control device checks and annual inspections; NPDES requires routine DMR submissions; Title V periodic monitoring ensures ongoing conformity, with full audits tied to permit renewals (typically 5 years).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **EPA**?

**Non-compliance with EPA standards triggers civil penalties (strict liability, up to statutory maximums recovering economic benefit), injunctive relief, and criminal charges for knowing violations.** Settlements like Hino Motors ($1.6B) show multimillion fines for data falsification; enforcement via inspections, ECHO data, and citizen suits escalates with poor records.

An **EPA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**No, these FAQs focus solely on EPA standards as standalone U.S. federal requirements under 40 CFR.** Mapping to other frameworks is outside scope to maintain independent topical authority.

What is the first step to begin implementing **EPA**?

**The first step is conducting a baseline compliance audit using EPA protocols (e.g., RCRA TSDF checklist) to map obligations, permits, and gaps.** Develop a regulatory register covering statutes, 40 CFR parts, state implementations, and high-risk areas like labeling, DMRs, and accumulation limits.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 26000**?

**ISO 26000 provides international guidance on social responsibility to help organizations integrate sustainable practices into their operations.** Published in 2010 and confirmed current in 2021, it defines social responsibility as accountability for impacts on society and the environment through transparent, ethical behavior that contributes to sustainable development, respects stakeholder expectations, complies with law, aligns with international norms, and embeds across the organization.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 26000**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with ISO 26000, as it is voluntary guidance applicable to all types regardless of size, sector, or location.** It targets private, public, and non-profit entities, including SMEs, multinationals, governments, and NGOs, encouraging professional adoption for enhanced sustainability performance, stakeholder trust, and risk management through its seven core subjects.

Does **ISO 26000** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 26000 explicitly does not require external audits or third-party certification, as it contains no auditable requirements.** Its Scope (Clause 1) states certification claims would misrepresent its purpose; organizations use it as guidance, building credibility via self-assessment, stakeholder engagement, transparent reporting, and alignment with frameworks like GRI.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 26000** be performed?

**ISO 26000 recommends periodic self-assessments at appropriate intervals aligned with organizational context and stakeholder needs.** Organizations should review social responsibility performance regularly—typically annually or during management reviews—covering core subjects, principles, progress on priorities, shortfalls, and improvement plans to ensure ongoing integration and relevance.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 26000**?

**There are no direct legal consequences for non-compliance with ISO 26000, as it is non-binding guidance without certification or enforcement.** Indirect risks include reputational damage, stakeholder distrust, lost market access, investor scrutiny, and heightened exposure to related regulations on human rights, labor, or environment, potentially leading to operational disruptions or litigation.

An **ISO 26000** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 26000 aligns with frameworks like OECD Guidelines, UN Global Compact, GRI, and UN SDGs through official ISO linkage documents.** It complements them by providing principles and core subjects for implementation, such as human rights due diligence (UNGP), reporting (GRI), and multinational conduct (OECD), enabling structured ESG integration without replacing certifiable standards.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 26000**?

**The first step is to recognize social responsibility and engage stakeholders to identify relevant issues (Clause 5).** Conduct a contextual assessment of impacts, map stakeholders, and prioritize core subjects (governance, human rights, etc.) based on significance, setting the foundation for principle-based integration throughout the organization.

EPA vs ISO 26000

Standards Comparison

EPA

Mandatory

1970

U.S. federal regulations for environmental protection standards

ISO 26000

Voluntary

2010

International guidance standard for social responsibility

Quick Verdict

EPA enforces mandatory environmental standards for U.S. industries via permits and monitoring, while ISO 26000 offers voluntary global guidance on social responsibility. Companies adopt EPA for legal compliance; ISO 26000 for strategic sustainability and stakeholder trust.

Air Quality

EPA

EPA Standards under CAA, CWA, RCRA

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Codified in 40 CFR under CAA, CWA, RCRA statutes
Facility-specific permits via NPDES, Title V, RCRA
Evidence-driven compliance with QA/QC monitoring, DMRs
Blends technology-based and health-protective standards
Federal-state implementation with dynamic rulemakings

Social Responsibility

ISO 26000

ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Seven principles underpinning all SR activities
Seven core subjects for comprehensive coverage
Non-certifiable voluntary guidance framework
Stakeholder engagement for prioritization
Integration into organizational governance and operations

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

EPA Details

What It Is

EPA standards are a family of legally binding regulatory requirements issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under major statutes like the Clean Air Act (CAA), Clean Water Act (CWA), and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). This regulatory framework codifies protections in Title 40 CFR, focusing on air, water, and waste media. Primary purpose: protect human health and environment through risk management combining health-based endpoints (e.g., NAAQS) and technology-based controls (e.g., MACT, effluent guidelines).

Key Components

Statutory mandates translated to 40 CFR regulations and site-specific permits (NPDES, Title V).
Numeric limits, thresholds, monitoring, recordkeeping, reporting.
Enforcement pathways with civil/criminal penalties.
Core principles: evidence-driven compliance, federal-state primacy, PDCA-like continuous review. No fixed control count; program-specific (e.g., RCRA Subparts AA/BB/CC).

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for regulated entities to avoid penalties, shutdowns, liabilities. Drives risk reduction, operational efficiency, ESG alignment. Builds stakeholder trust via transparency tools (ECHO, ICIS).

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, regulatory register, controls deployment, training, audits. Applies to industries (energy, manufacturing); high complexity due to state variations. No certification; compliance via self-audits, inspections.

ISO 26000 Details

What It Is

ISO 26000:2010 is the international guidance standard on social responsibility (SR). It offers voluntary, non-certifiable advice for all organizations—regardless of size, sector, or location—to address impacts on society and the environment. Its principles-based, holistic approach emphasizes context-specific prioritization through stakeholder engagement.

Key Components

**Seven principlesAccountability, transparency, ethical behavior, respect for stakeholder interests, rule of law, international norms, human rights.
**Seven core subjectsOrganizational governance, human rights, labor practices, environment, fair operating practices, consumer issues, community involvement.
No fixed requirements; focuses on integration rather than certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Enhances risk management, resilience, and stakeholder trust.
Aligns with SDGs, OECD, GRI for credibility.
Drives competitive advantages like talent retention, market access, efficiency.
Builds reputation without compliance burdens.

Implementation Overview

**Phased approachAssess impacts, engage stakeholders, prioritize issues, integrate into governance/operations, report transparently.
Applicable universally; no audits/certification needed.

Key Differences

Aspect	EPA	ISO 26000
Scope	Air, water, waste emissions standards	Social responsibility core subjects
Industry	Regulated industrial sectors nationwide	All organizations globally
Nature	Mandatory federal regulations enforced	Voluntary non-certifiable guidance
Testing	Monitoring, sampling, inspections required	Self-assessment, no formal testing
Penalties	Civil/criminal fines, enforcement actions	No penalties, reputational risks only

Scope

EPA

Air, water, waste emissions standards

ISO 26000

Social responsibility core subjects

Industry

EPA

Regulated industrial sectors nationwide

ISO 26000

All organizations globally

Nature

EPA

Mandatory federal regulations enforced

ISO 26000

Voluntary non-certifiable guidance

Testing

EPA

Monitoring, sampling, inspections required

ISO 26000

Self-assessment, no formal testing

Penalties

EPA

Civil/criminal fines, enforcement actions

ISO 26000

No penalties, reputational risks only

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about EPA and ISO 26000

EPA FAQ

ISO 26000 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The CIS Controls v8.1 Evidence Pack: What Auditors Ask For (and How to Produce Proof Fast)

Fail CIS Controls v8.1 audits due to missing evidence? Get the blueprint: exact artifacts auditors want, repository structure, and automation from security tool

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation

Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc

From SOC to AI-Native CDC: Redefining Triage and Response in 2026

Explore the shift from SOCs to AI-Native CDCs. Autonomous agents handle Tier 1 triage in 2026, empowering analysts for complex threats. Discover the future of c

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs ISO 37301

Compare CSL (China's Cybersecurity Law) vs ISO 37301: Key differences in data localization, risk mgmt & governance. Your guide to compliant China ops. Explore now!

AEO vs PRINCE2

Compare AEO vs PRINCE2: Explore customs compliance & supply chain security (AEO) against structured project governance (PRINCE2). Unlock ROI insights, certification strategies & tailored implementation for efficiency.

CCPA vs WELL

CCPA vs WELL: Compare privacy law mandates with health building standards. Uncover compliance strategies, risks, benefits & implementation for resilient businesses. Master now!

EPA

ISO 26000

Quick Verdict

EPA

Key Features

ISO 26000

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

EPA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 26000 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

EPA FAQ

What is the primary objective of EPA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with EPA?

Does EPA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for EPA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with EPA?

An EPA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing EPA?

ISO 26000 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 26000?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 26000?

Does ISO 26000 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 26000 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 26000?

An ISO 26000 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 26000?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The CIS Controls v8.1 Evidence Pack: What Auditors Ask For (and How to Produce Proof Fast)

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation

From SOC to AI-Native CDC: Redefining Triage and Response in 2026

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs ISO 37301

AEO vs PRINCE2

CCPA vs WELL