Standards Comparison

    EPA

    Mandatory
    1970

    Federal regulations for air, water, waste protection compliance

    VS

    ISO 31000

    Voluntary
    2018

    International guidelines for enterprise risk management

    Quick Verdict

    EPA mandates environmental compliance via enforceable standards for U.S. industries, while ISO 31000 offers voluntary risk management guidelines for all organizations. Companies adopt EPA to avoid penalties; ISO 31000 to enhance decision-making and resilience.

    Environmental Protection

    EPA

    U.S. EPA Standards under 40 CFR Title 40

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Multi-layered standards under CAA, CWA, RCRA in 40 CFR
    • Technology- and health-based performance limits and criteria
    • Site-specific permitting translating national baselines locally
    • Evidence-driven compliance via monitoring, QA/QC, DMRs
    • Predictable enforcement with penalties, settlements, SEPs
    Risk Management

    ISO 31000

    ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Eight core principles for effective risk management
    • Leadership commitment and governance integration
    • Iterative six-step risk management process
    • Customizable framework for any organization
    • Non-certifiable guidelines emphasizing continual improvement

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    EPA Details

    What It Is

    EPA standards are legally binding regulatory requirements issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under statutes like Clean Air Act (CAA), Clean Water Act (CWA), and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), codified in 40 CFR. They protect human health and environment via performance standards, permits, monitoring, and enforcement. Key approach blends technology-based controls (e.g., MACT, effluent guidelines) with health-based criteria (e.g., NAAQS, WQS).

    Key Components

    • Numeric limits, thresholds, work practices for air emissions, discharges, waste.
    • Permitting mechanisms (NPDES, Title V, RCRA) for site-specific obligations.
    • Monitoring, recordkeeping, reporting with QA/QC and e-reporting (DMRs).
    • Enforcement structures with civil/criminal penalties. Compliance via demonstrated performance, no central certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Avoid strict liability penalties, shutdowns, criminal risks.
    • Manage multi-media compliance, reduce legacy liabilities.
    • Gain ESG advantages, operational efficiencies, stakeholder trust via ECHO transparency.
    • Strategic adaptation to dynamic rulemakings.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased gap analysis, controls design, deployment, audits. Applies to regulated industries (energy, manufacturing). Federal-state oversight requires ongoing monitoring, state-specific adjustments, internal EMS.

    ISO 31000 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 31000:2018, Risk management — Guidelines is an International Organization for Standardization framework providing non-certifiable guidance for systematic risk management. Its primary purpose is to help organizations of any size or sector manage uncertainty affecting objectives, using a principles-based, iterative approach focused on creating and protecting value.

    Key Components

    • **Three pillars8 principles (e.g., integrated, customized, dynamic), framework (leadership, integration, design, implementation, evaluation, improvement), and 6-step process (communication, scope/context/criteria, assessment, treatment, monitoring/review, recording/reporting).
    • Built on PDCA cycle; no fixed controls, emphasizes flexibility.
    • Non-certifiable guidelines model.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Enhances decision-making, resilience, and value creation.
    • Supports governance, strategy, and operations; builds stakeholder trust.
    • Addresses regulatory expectations indirectly; competitive edge via risk-informed strategies.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: leadership alignment, gap analysis, pilot, rollout, monitoring.
    • Tailored to context; involves policy, training, tools like GRC platforms.
    • Universal applicability; no audits required, internal assurance suffices. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    EPA
    Environmental compliance standards across air/water/waste
    ISO 31000
    Enterprise-wide risk management principles and process

    Industry

    EPA
    Regulated industrial sectors (energy/manufacturing)
    ISO 31000
    All organizations/sectors worldwide

    Nature

    EPA
    Mandatory U.S. federal regulations with enforcement
    ISO 31000
    Voluntary non-certifiable guidelines

    Testing

    EPA
    Mandatory monitoring/sampling/inspections by EPA/states
    ISO 31000
    Internal reviews/audits for framework effectiveness

    Penalties

    EPA
    Civil/criminal fines, shutdowns, settlements
    ISO 31000
    No legal penalties (internal governance only)

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about EPA and ISO 31000

    EPA FAQ

    ISO 31000 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages