EU AI Act
EU regulation for risk-based AI safety and governance
APRA CPS 234
Australian prudential standard for information security resilience.
Quick Verdict
EU AI Act regulates AI systems risk-based across EU sectors with conformity and fines, while APRA CPS 234 mandates information security capability for Australian financial entities via testing and notifications. Organizations adopt for compliance, market access, and resilience.
EU AI Act
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 on Artificial Intelligence
Key Features
- Risk-based four-tier classification framework
- Outright prohibitions on unacceptable AI practices
- Conformity assessments and CE marking for high-risk systems
- Dedicated obligations for systemic-risk GPAI models
- Extraterritorial scope for non-EU providers and deployers
APRA CPS 234
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security
Key Features
- Board ultimate responsibility for information security
- 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents
- Systematic risk-based testing of controls
- Third-party capability and control assessments
- Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
EU AI Act Details
What It Is
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the EU AI Act, is a comprehensive horizontal regulation establishing a risk-based framework for AI systems. It prohibits unacceptable-risk practices, regulates high-risk systems via lifecycle controls, mandates transparency for limited-risk AI, and leaves minimal-risk unregulated. Scope covers providers, deployers, and third-country entities using outputs in the EU.
Key Components
- **Four risk tiersprohibited, high-risk (Annex I/III), limited-risk, minimal-risk.
- High-risk obligations: risk management (Article 9), data governance (Article 10), documentation (Articles 11-13), human oversight (Article 14), cybersecurity (Article 15).
- GPAI rules (Chapter V), conformity assessments, CE marking, EU database registration.
- Hybrid enforcement: AI Office, national authorities, fines up to 7% global turnover.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory compliance ensures EU market access, mitigates fines and bans. Enhances trust, reduces risks in high-stakes sectors like employment and biometrics. Builds competitive edge via certified safety and transparency.
Implementation Overview
Phased rollout (6-36 months). Inventory AI assets, classify risks, build QMS, conduct assessments. Applies to all sizes targeting EU; requires audits, post-market monitoring. Cross-functional: legal, engineering, governance.
APRA CPS 234 Details
What It Is
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding regulation issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority. Effective from 1 July 2019, it mandates APRA-regulated entities like banks, insurers, and super funds to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats to protect confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information assets, including those managed by third parties. It adopts a risk-based, assurance-driven approach focused on governance, controls, and resilience.
Key Components
- 11 core requirements spanning governance, asset classification, controls, testing, incident response, and APRA notifications.
- Pillars include Board accountability, systematic testing, internal audit assurance, and 72-hour incident reporting.
- Built on CIA triad principles with commensurability to risks; no fixed controls but evidence-based compliance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for APRA-regulated entities to avoid penalties, enforcement, and reputational damage.
- Enhances cyber resilience, stakeholder trust, and operational continuity.
- Provides competitive edge through robust third-party oversight and incident readiness.
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: gap analysis, policy frameworks, asset inventories, testing programs.
- Applies to all sizes in Australian financial sector; requires independent audits, no formal certification. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | EU AI Act | APRA CPS 234 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | AI systems risk-based regulation across lifecycle | Information security for financial assets CIA |
| Industry | All sectors EU-wide horizontal applicability | Australian financial services only |
| Nature | Mandatory EU regulation with fines | Mandatory prudential standard enforcement |
| Testing | Conformity assessments notified bodies | Systematic independent control testing |
| Penalties | Up to 7% global turnover fines | Supervisory actions remediation orders |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about EU AI Act and APRA CPS 234
EU AI Act FAQ
APRA CPS 234 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation
Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc

Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention
Discover how modern compliance monitoring tools leverage continuous, real-time oversight and automated alerts to shift organizations from reactive problem-solving to proactive threat detection and prevention, safeguarding against emerging risks before they escalate.

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)
Translate CIS Controls v8.1 to cloud-native: Kubernetes patterns for IAM, logging, vuln mgmt, hardening on AWS, Azure, GCP + IaC. Practical playbook for teams.
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
CE Marking vs UL Certification
Decode CE Marking vs UL Certification: EU self-declaration vs US third-party testing & audits. Uncover key differences, steps & strategies for global compliance success now!
BRC vs Australian Privacy Act
Compare BRCGS Food Safety vs Australian Privacy Act: key differences in compliance, risk management, and implementation for food manufacturers. Align standards for audit success now!
SAFe vs ISO 41001
Compare SAFe vs ISO 41001: Agile scaling powerhouse meets FM management standard. Discover key differences, benefits & synergies for enterprise agility. Boost efficiency now!