FDA 21 CFR Part 11
FDA regulation for trustworthy electronic records and signatures
CMMI
Global framework for process maturity and improvement
Quick Verdict
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 mandates electronic records trustworthiness for life sciences compliance, while CMMI is a voluntary maturity model for process improvement across industries. Companies adopt Part 11 for FDA enforcement avoidance; CMMI for predictable delivery and competitive benchmarking.
FDA 21 CFR Part 11
21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures
Key Features
- Establishes electronic records equivalent to paper records
- Mandates secure, time-stamped audit trails for integrity
- Requires unique, multi-component electronic signatures
- Differentiates controls for closed versus open systems
- Enforces risk-based validation and access limitations
CMMI
Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)
Key Features
- Maturity Levels 0-5 from Initial to Optimizing
- 25 Practice Areas in 4 Category Areas
- Staged vs continuous representations
- SCAMPI appraisals for official benchmarking
- Generic practices for institutionalization
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Details
What It Is
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 is a U.S. regulation defining criteria for electronic records and electronic signatures to be trustworthy, reliable, and equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures. It applies to FDA-regulated industries using electronic systems for predicate rule records. The risk-based approach, clarified in 2003 guidance, narrows scope to relied-upon electronic records while enforcing core controls.
Key Components
- Subparts: General provisions, electronic records (closed/open systems), electronic signatures.
- Core controls: validation, audit trails, access/authority/device checks, training, documentation, signature linking/uniqueness.
- Over 20 specific requirements across §§11.10-11.300.
- Compliance via validation (IQ/OQ/PQ), no formal certification but FDA inspection.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for electronic reliance in pharma, devices, biologics; mitigates enforcement risks like warning letters. Enhances data integrity, inspection readiness, operational efficiency. Builds stakeholder trust, supports digital transformation.
Implementation Overview
Risk-based CSV lifecycle: scope records, classify systems, validate controls, SOPs/training, supplier governance. Applies to life sciences globally under FDA jurisdiction; ongoing via change control, audits. (178 words)
CMMI Details
What It Is
Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) is a process improvement framework for benchmarking and enhancing organizational performance in product development, services, and acquisition. It uses a maturity-based approach with staged or continuous representations to institutionalize practices, reducing variability and enabling predictable outcomes.
Key Components
- **Maturity Levels (0-5)Incomplete to Optimizing, progressing from ad-hoc to data-driven innovation.
- 25 Practice Areas (v2.0): Grouped into Doing, Managing, Enabling, Improving categories.
- **Generic PracticesEnsure policy, planning, resources, and evaluation for institutionalization.
- **SCAMPI AppraisalsClass A for official benchmarking.
Why Organizations Use It
- Drives predictability, quality, and ROI (e.g., 34% cost reduction).
- Meets DoD contract requirements; boosts bidding success.
- Mitigates risks via measurement and causal analysis.
- Builds customer trust through certified maturity.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, piloting, training, appraisal. Applies to mid-large software/IT firms globally. Requires authorized SCAMPI audits for ratings. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | FDA 21 CFR Part 11 | CMMI |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Electronic records/signatures trustworthiness in FDA-regulated activities | Organizational process maturity across development/services/acquisition |
| Industry | Life sciences, pharma, medical devices (US-focused) | Software, defense, IT services, manufacturing (global) |
| Nature | Mandatory US FDA regulation with enforcement discretion | Voluntary process improvement model with appraisals |
| Testing | Risk-based system validation, inspection readiness | SCAMPI appraisals (A/B/C) for maturity/capability levels |
| Penalties | Warning letters, product holds, regulatory action | No legal penalties, loss of certification/competitiveness |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and CMMI
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 FAQ
CMMI FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Beyond the Boardroom: 5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Elevates Every Department
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software boosts HR, IT, finance & more: automate risks, enhance efficiency, ensure data integrity, stay audit-ready. Elevate y

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights
Demystify NIST CSF 2.0 jargon with plain English tables for Govern, Supply Chain & Core Functions. Actionable steps for risk oversight & vendor management. Empo

HITRUST CSF MyCSF Platform Mastery: Infograph of Evidence Tagging Workflows and Top 5 Maturity Tier Acceleration Takeaways
Master MyCSF platform with infographics on evidence tagging for 1,400+ HITRUST controls across 19 domains. Cut documentation by 30%, boost Measured/Managed tier
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
CCPA vs CMMI
Discover CCPA vs CMMI: Privacy law meets process maturity. Expert strategies, compliance frameworks, pitfalls, and ROI insights. Elevate business resilience today!
Six Sigma vs ISO 21001
Discover Six Sigma vs ISO 21001: Data-driven DMAIC vs learner-focused EOMS. Compare for process excellence, quality gains & education outcomes. Choose wisely today!
APPI vs REACH
Compare APPI vs REACH: Japan's privacy powerhouse meets EU's chemical compliance giant. Unlock strategies, pitfalls, and frameworks for global mastery—boost your edge now.