FDA 21 CFR Part 11
FDA regulation for electronic records and signatures equivalency
FSSC 22000
GFSI-benchmarked certification scheme for food safety management.
Quick Verdict
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 mandates electronic record integrity for regulated industries, while FSSC 22000 certifies food safety systems globally. Companies adopt Part 11 for FDA compliance, FSSC for market access and supply chain trust.
FDA 21 CFR Part 11
21 CFR Part 11: Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures
Key Features
- Establishes equivalency of electronic to paper records
- Requires secure, computer-generated audit trails
- Differentiates controls for closed and open systems
- Mandates unique, linked electronic signatures
- Enforces access, authority, and device checks
FSSC 22000
Food Safety System Certification 22000
Key Features
- Integrates ISO 22000 with sector-specific PRPs
- GFSI-benchmarked for global supply chain recognition
- Mandates food defense and fraud mitigation plans
- Requires allergen management validation and verification
- Enforces operational audits with PRP verification
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Details
What It Is
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 is a U.S. regulation establishing criteria for electronic records and electronic signatures to be trustworthy, reliable, and equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures. It applies to FDA-regulated industries using electronic systems for predicate-rule records. The risk-based approach, clarified in 2003 guidance, narrows scope to records relied upon electronically, with enforcement discretion for validation, audit trails, retention, and legacy systems.
Key Components
- **Subpart AScope, definitions (closed/open systems).
- **Subpart BControls (§11.10 closed systems: validation, audit trails, access; §11.30 open systems: encryption/digital signatures); signature linking.
- **Subpart CSignature uniqueness, multi-component controls, non-repudiation. Built on ALCOA+ principles; no certification, but inspection readiness required.
Why Organizations Use It
Ensures data integrity for compliance; mitigates enforcement risks (warnings, holds); enables paperless efficiency, faster inspections, quality improvements. Mandatory for electronic reliance in pharma, devices, biologics.
Implementation Overview
Risk-based CSV (GAMP5): scope records, validate systems (IQ/OQ/PQ), implement controls, train personnel, govern vendors. Phased: gap analysis, design, validation, go-live, monitoring. Targets life sciences; audited via FDA inspections.
FSSC 22000 Details
What It Is
FSSC 22000 (Food Safety System Certification 22000) is a GFSI-benchmarked certification scheme for Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS) across food chain categories like manufacturing, packaging, and logistics. It uses a risk-based PDCA approach integrating ISO standards, PRPs, and additional controls.
Key Components
- ISO 22000:2018 for FSMS clauses 4–10
- Sector-specific PRPs (e.g., ISO/TS 22002-1 manufacturing)
- FSSC Additional Requirements (17 total: food defense, allergens, culture) Built on HACCP principles; requires third-party audits per ISO 22003-1.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets retailer mandates and regulatory alignment
- Reduces recall risks, fraud, and contamination
- Enhances global market access and trust
- Supports quality integration and SDGs
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, FSMS design, PRP/HACCP rollout, training, audits. Suits food sector firms; 6–24 months typical. Includes Stage 1/2 certification, surveillance.
Key Differences
| Aspect | FDA 21 CFR Part 11 | FSSC 22000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Electronic records/signatures trustworthiness | Food safety management systems, PRPs, HACCP |
| Industry | FDA-regulated pharma, devices, some food | Global food chain manufacturing, packaging, logistics |
| Nature | Mandatory US FDA regulation | Voluntary GFSI-benchmarked certification scheme |
| Testing | Risk-based system validation, audit trails | ISO audits, PRP verification, surveillance cycles |
| Penalties | Warning letters, enforcement actions | Loss of certification, market access denial |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and FSSC 22000
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 FAQ
FSSC 22000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Asset-Backed Issuers and SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Applicability, Disclosures, and Compliance Roadmap
How SEC cybersecurity rules apply to asset-backed issuers (ABS): Form 10-D disclosures, ABS-EE risk management, Inline XBRL tagging, exemptions. Roadmap for tru

Top 10 Reasons CMMC Level 3 Certification Unlocks Competitive Edge for Primes Handling Critical DoD Programs
Discover top 10 reasons CMMC Level 3 certification unlocks competitive edge for DoD primes. Reduced APT risks, procurement prefs, NIST 800-172 compliance via v2

Decoding Tomorrow's Regulations: How Advanced Compliance Tools Predict and Prepare for Future Shifts
Advanced compliance tools use AI, analytics & real-time monitoring to predict regulatory shifts, cut non-compliance costs 3x, and ensure audit readiness. Stay p
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PRINCE2 vs ISO 30301
PRINCE2 vs ISO 30301: Compare project governance powerhouse with records management mastery. Boost compliance, efficiency, and strategic control. Discover key differences now!
PCI DSS vs APPI
Compare PCI DSS vs APPI: Payment security meets Japan's privacy law. Unpack scopes, controls & compliance diffs for global ops. Safeguard data—read now!
GMP vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Compare GMP vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Key pharma standards vs. rapid incident disclosure & governance mandates. Align compliance strategies for life sciences success.