FDA 21 CFR Part 11
US FDA regulation equating electronic records to paper
ISO 13485
International standard for medical device quality management systems.
Quick Verdict
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 ensures electronic records/signatures are trustworthy for FDA-regulated firms, while ISO 13485 mandates comprehensive QMS for medical devices. Companies adopt Part 11 for data integrity compliance and ISO 13485 for global certification and market access.
FDA 21 CFR Part 11
21 CFR Part 11: Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures
Key Features
- Establishes electronic records equivalent to paper records
- Mandates secure, time-stamped audit trails for integrity
- Requires unique, non-repudiable electronic signatures
- Differentiates controls for closed vs open systems
- Enforces risk-based validation and access limitations
ISO 13485
ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices Quality management systems
Key Features
- Risk-based controls for device lifecycle processes
- Design and development validation requirements
- Post-market surveillance and complaint handling
- Supplier evaluation and outsourcing controls
- Traceability and medical device file mandates
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Details
What It Is
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 is a US federal regulation establishing criteria for electronic records and electronic signatures to be trustworthy, reliable, and equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures. It applies to FDA-regulated industries using electronic systems for predicate rule records, employing a risk-based approach with enforcement discretion on certain elements like validation and audit trails.
Key Components
- **Subpart BControls for closed (§11.10) and open (§11.30) systems, including access limits, audit trails, checks, and signatures.
- **Subpart CElectronic signature requirements for uniqueness, manifestation (§11.50), linking (§11.70), and controls (§§11.100-11.300).
- Core principles: authenticity, integrity, non-repudiation; no fixed number of controls but enforced via SOPs, training, documentation.
- Compliance via risk-based validation, not certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Ensures regulatory acceptance of digital records, mitigates enforcement risks like warning letters, supports data integrity for quality decisions, enables paperless operations, builds inspector trust.
Implementation Overview
Phased: scope predicate records, classify systems, CSV (IQ/OQ/PQ), implement controls, train, monitor. Targets life sciences firms; requires SOPs, audits, no formal certification but FDA inspection readiness.
ISO 13485 Details
What It Is
ISO 13485:2016 is the international standard titled Medical devices — Quality management systems — Requirements for regulatory purposes. It provides a certifiable framework for organizations in the medical device lifecycle, emphasizing risk-based controls to ensure consistent safety, performance, and regulatory compliance across design, production, distribution, servicing, and post-market activities.
Key Components
- Organized into **Clauses 4–8QMS foundation, management responsibility, resources, product realization, measurement/improvement.
- Over 100 requirements focused on documentation, validation, traceability, and post-market surveillance.
- Built on process approach, integrating ISO 14971 risk management; requires certification via accredited bodies with staged audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enables market access (EU MDR, FDA QMSR alignment by 2026), reduces recalls, and lowers cost of quality.
- Meets regulatory expectations, builds stakeholder trust, and provides competitive edge in supply chains.
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: gap analysis, documentation, training, validation, audits.
- Suited for manufacturers, suppliers, SMEs to globals; certification via Stage 1/2 audits, surveillance. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | FDA 21 CFR Part 11 | ISO 13485 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Electronic records/signatures trustworthiness | Full QMS for medical device lifecycle |
| Industry | FDA-regulated life sciences, pharma, devices | Medical device manufacturers, suppliers globally |
| Nature | Mandatory U.S. FDA regulation | Voluntary international certification standard |
| Testing | Risk-based system validation, audit trails | IQ/OQ/PQ process validation, internal audits |
| Penalties | Warning letters, enforcement actions | Loss of certification, market access denial |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and ISO 13485
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 FAQ
ISO 13485 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Measuring CIS Controls v8.1 in the Real World: KPIs, Dashboards, and Automated Evidence for Continuous Assurance
Master CIS Controls v8.1 measurement with essential KPIs, executive-ready dashboards, and automated evidence collection for continuous assurance. Make complianc

The Human-AI Synergy: How Modern Compliance Tools Amplify Your Team's Strategic Impact
Unlock human-AI synergy with modern compliance tools. Automate monitoring, cut non-compliance risks 3x, and boost strategic decision-making. Elevate your team's

Top 10 Reasons ISO 27701 is the Ultimate Privacy Boost for Your ISO 27001 ISMS in 2025
Extend ISO 27001 with ISO 27701 for ultimate privacy governance amid GDPR & AI regs. Discover top 10 advantages like integrated audits to future-proof your ISMS
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
WCAG vs MAS TRM
Compare WCAG 2.2 accessibility vs MAS TRM tech risk guidelines. Key differences, compliance strategies & implementation for finance pros. Achieve resilient digital ops now!
PIPEDA vs SQF
PIPEDA vs SQF: Compare Canada's privacy law with global food safety standards. Key differences, compliance tips & strategies for seamless integration. Master both now!
ISA 95 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
Compare ISA 95 vs MLPS 2.0: Master enterprise-manufacturing integration standards and cybersecurity protection schemes. Optimize compliance, reduce risks—explore key differences now!