Standards Comparison

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11

    Mandatory
    1997

    US FDA regulation equating electronic records to paper

    VS

    ISO 13485

    Mandatory
    2016

    International standard for medical device quality management systems.

    Quick Verdict

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11 ensures electronic records/signatures are trustworthy for FDA-regulated firms, while ISO 13485 mandates comprehensive QMS for medical devices. Companies adopt Part 11 for data integrity compliance and ISO 13485 for global certification and market access.

    Electronic Records

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11

    21 CFR Part 11: Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Establishes electronic records equivalent to paper records
    • Mandates secure, time-stamped audit trails for integrity
    • Requires unique, non-repudiable electronic signatures
    • Differentiates controls for closed vs open systems
    • Enforces risk-based validation and access limitations
    Quality Management

    ISO 13485

    ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices Quality management systems

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based controls for device lifecycle processes
    • Design and development validation requirements
    • Post-market surveillance and complaint handling
    • Supplier evaluation and outsourcing controls
    • Traceability and medical device file mandates

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Details

    What It Is

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11 is a US federal regulation establishing criteria for electronic records and electronic signatures to be trustworthy, reliable, and equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures. It applies to FDA-regulated industries using electronic systems for predicate rule records, employing a risk-based approach with enforcement discretion on certain elements like validation and audit trails.

    Key Components

    • **Subpart BControls for closed (§11.10) and open (§11.30) systems, including access limits, audit trails, checks, and signatures.
    • **Subpart CElectronic signature requirements for uniqueness, manifestation (§11.50), linking (§11.70), and controls (§§11.100-11.300).
    • Core principles: authenticity, integrity, non-repudiation; no fixed number of controls but enforced via SOPs, training, documentation.
    • Compliance via risk-based validation, not certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Ensures regulatory acceptance of digital records, mitigates enforcement risks like warning letters, supports data integrity for quality decisions, enables paperless operations, builds inspector trust.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: scope predicate records, classify systems, CSV (IQ/OQ/PQ), implement controls, train, monitor. Targets life sciences firms; requires SOPs, audits, no formal certification but FDA inspection readiness.

    ISO 13485 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 13485:2016 is the international standard titled Medical devices — Quality management systems — Requirements for regulatory purposes. It provides a certifiable framework for organizations in the medical device lifecycle, emphasizing risk-based controls to ensure consistent safety, performance, and regulatory compliance across design, production, distribution, servicing, and post-market activities.

    Key Components

    • Organized into **Clauses 4–8QMS foundation, management responsibility, resources, product realization, measurement/improvement.
    • Over 100 requirements focused on documentation, validation, traceability, and post-market surveillance.
    • Built on process approach, integrating ISO 14971 risk management; requires certification via accredited bodies with staged audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Enables market access (EU MDR, FDA QMSR alignment by 2026), reduces recalls, and lowers cost of quality.
    • Meets regulatory expectations, builds stakeholder trust, and provides competitive edge in supply chains.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased approach: gap analysis, documentation, training, validation, audits.
    • Suited for manufacturers, suppliers, SMEs to globals; certification via Stage 1/2 audits, surveillance. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11
    Electronic records/signatures trustworthiness
    ISO 13485
    Full QMS for medical device lifecycle

    Industry

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11
    FDA-regulated life sciences, pharma, devices
    ISO 13485
    Medical device manufacturers, suppliers globally

    Nature

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11
    Mandatory U.S. FDA regulation
    ISO 13485
    Voluntary international certification standard

    Testing

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11
    Risk-based system validation, audit trails
    ISO 13485
    IQ/OQ/PQ process validation, internal audits

    Penalties

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11
    Warning letters, enforcement actions
    ISO 13485
    Loss of certification, market access denial

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and ISO 13485

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11 FAQ

    ISO 13485 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages