What is the primary objective of **FDA 21 CFR Part 11**?

**The primary objective of FDA 21 CFR Part 11 is to establish criteria under which the Agency considers electronic records and electronic signatures trustworthy, reliable, and equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures executed on paper (§11.1(a)).** This equivalency enables electronic technology use while ensuring authenticity, integrity, confidentiality (when appropriate), and non-repudiation through controls in Subparts B and C, including validation (§11.10(a)), access limitation (§11.10(d)), and audit trails (§11.10(e)).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **FDA 21 CFR Part 11**?

**FDA 21 CFR Part 11 applies to organizations using electronic records created, modified, maintained, archived, retrieved, or transmitted under predicate rule requirements, or electronic records/signatures relied upon for regulated activities (§11.1(b)).** This includes pharmaceutical, biotech, medical device, and related firms where electronic records replace paper for predicate-required records (e.g., 21 CFR Parts 211, 820), electronic submissions accepted under docket 92S-0251, or legally binding electronic signatures; paper-reliant systems are generally excluded per 2003 guidance.

Does **FDA 21 CFR Part 11** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, FDA 21 CFR Part 11 does not require external audits or third-party certification.** Compliance is demonstrated through internal controls, validation (§11.10(a)), SOPs, training (§11.10(i)), and inspection readiness (§11.1(e)), with systems and documentation subject to FDA inspection; predicate rules remain enforceable, and FDA exercises discretion on certain elements per 2003 guidance without mandating external validation.

How often should an assessment for **FDA 21 CFR Part 11** be performed?

**FDA 21 CFR Part 11 does not prescribe a fixed frequency for assessments; they must occur via change control, periodic reviews, and risk-based validation to maintain system fitness (§11.10(a),(k)).** FDA’s 2003 guidance supports risk-based approaches, with ongoing monitoring through operational checks (§11.10(f)), audit trail reviews, access audits, and reassessments triggered by changes, ensuring predicate rule compliance.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **FDA 21 CFR Part 11**?

**Non-compliance with FDA 21 CFR Part 11 can result in FDA enforcement actions including Form 483 observations, warning letters, product holds, recalls, and injunctions, as predicate rules remain fully enforceable.** The 2003 guidance notes continued enforcement of access controls (§11.10(d)), checks (§11.10(f)-(h)), training (§11.10(i)), signatures (Subpart C), and documentation (§11.10(k)), with data integrity failures often leading to CAPA deficiencies and operational disruptions.

Can **FDA 21 CFR Part 11** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, FDA 21 CFR Part 11 controls can be mapped to frameworks like EU Annex 11 for computerized systems in GMP environments.** Core elements such as validation, audit trails, access controls, and electronic signatures align with Annex 11 principles for data integrity (ALCOA+), though Part 11 emphasizes U.S. predicate rules and FDA’s narrow scope per 2003 guidance.

What is the first step to begin implementing **FDA 21 CFR Part 11**?

**The first step to implement FDA 21 CFR Part 11 is to establish a formal applicability framework mapping predicate rules to records and assessing business reliance on electronic versions.** Per 2003 guidance, document scope decisions (e.g., electronic in lieu of paper or relied upon for regulated activities) in SOPs/specifications, classify systems as closed (§11.3(b)(4)) or open (§11.3(b)(9)), and prioritize enforced controls like access (§11.10(d)).

What is the primary objective of **ISO 22000**?

**ISO 22000 establishes, implements, maintains, and continually improves a Food Safety Management System (FSMS) to provide safe products and services.** It enables organizations to prevent, eliminate, or reduce food safety hazards to acceptable levels, demonstrate compliance with statutory, regulatory, and customer requirements, and ensure effective internal/external communication across the food chain. Published June 19, 2018, the standard integrates HACCP principles with two PDCA cycles—one organizational (Clauses 4-7, 9-10) and one operational (Clause 8)—using the High-Level Structure (HLS) for governance.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 22000**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 22000, as it is a voluntary international standard.** It applies professionally to any entity directly or indirectly in the food chain, including primary producers, feed/animal food producers, processors, packaging manufacturers, transport/storage providers, retailers, food services, and related suppliers. Organizations pursue it for certification to meet customer expectations, GFSI schemes like FSSC 22000, or market access, regardless of size.

Does **ISO 22000** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 22000 requires internal audits but external audits and third-party certification are voluntary.** Clause 9.2 mandates risk-based internal audits to verify FSMS conformity and effectiveness. Certification by accredited bodies involves stage 1 (readiness) and stage 2 (implementation) audits, followed by annual surveillance and triennial recertification, providing independent assurance aligned with ISO/IEC conformity assessment standards.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 22000** be performed?

**Internal assessments for ISO 22000 must be performed at planned intervals, risk-based, with full FSMS coverage at least annually.** Clause 9.2 requires internal audits based on process risk (e.g., frequent audits for high-risk CCPs/OPRPs). Management reviews (Clause 9.3) occur at planned intervals, typically quarterly or semi-annually, incorporating audit results, performance data, and changes. Hazard analyses and PRPs are reassessed on changes or annually.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 22000**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 22000 results in certification denial, suspension, or withdrawal by accredited bodies.** Internally, it leads to ineffective FSMS, uncontrolled hazards, recalls, regulatory violations, customer loss, and reputational damage. Audits identify nonconformities requiring corrective actions; persistent major nonconformities trigger certification failure. No direct legal penalties exist, as it is voluntary, but it exposes organizations to food safety incidents and market exclusion.

Can **ISO 22000** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 22000:2018 follows the High-Level Structure (HLS) identical to other ISO management system standards, enabling seamless mapping and integration.** Its Clauses 4-10 align with ISO 9001 (quality), ISO 14001 (environment), and ISO 45001 (occupational health), supporting combined audits and shared processes like risk planning, internal audits, and management reviews. It forms the foundation for GFSI schemes like FSSC 22000, incorporating ISO/TS 22002 PRPs.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 22000**?

**The first step to implement ISO 22000 is defining the FSMS scope and understanding organizational context (Clause 4).** Determine internal/external issues, interested parties' requirements, and FSMS boundaries, including products, processes, sites, and outsourced activities. Form a cross-functional food safety team, secure leadership commitment via a food safety policy (Clause 5), and conduct a gap analysis against all clauses.

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs ISO 22000

Standards Comparison

FDA 21 CFR Part 11

Mandatory

1997

FDA regulation for trustworthy electronic records and signatures

ISO 22000

Voluntary

2018

International standard for food safety management systems

Quick Verdict

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 mandates electronic record trustworthiness for pharma, while ISO 22000 certifies voluntary food safety systems globally. Pharma firms comply for FDA enforcement; food organizations adopt for market access and hazard control.

Electronic Records

FDA 21 CFR Part 11

21 CFR Part 11: Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Establishes equivalence of electronic records to paper records
Mandates secure, time-stamped audit trails for changes
Requires unique electronic signatures with non-repudiation
Differentiates controls for closed versus open systems
Enforces risk-based validation and access limitations

Food Safety

ISO 22000

ISO 22000:2018 Food safety management systems

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Adopts High-Level Structure for management system integration
Uses dual PDCA cycles for strategic and operational control
Integrates PRPs, OPRPs, and CCPs in hazard control plan
Emphasizes interactive communication across food chain
Requires risk-based hazard analysis and validation

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Details

What It Is

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 is a U.S. regulation defining criteria for electronic records and electronic signatures to be trustworthy and equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures. It applies to FDA-regulated industries using electronic systems for predicate-rule records. The risk-based approach, per 2003 FDA guidance, narrows scope to relied-upon electronic records, with enforcement discretion on validation, audit trails, retention, and copies.

Key Components

Subparts: General provisions, electronic records (closed/open systems controls), electronic signatures.
Core controls: validation, audit trails, access/authority/device checks, training, accountability policies, signature manifestation/linking.
Built on ALCOA+ principles for data integrity; no fixed control count, but emphasizes non-discretionary safeguards.
Compliance via validation, SOPs, inspections; no formal certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Ensures regulatory acceptance of digital records, mitigates enforcement risks (warnings, holds), supports data integrity for quality decisions. Provides efficiency gains, inspection readiness, and trust in life sciences.

Implementation Overview

Risk-based CSV (GAMP5): scope records, validate systems (IQ/OQ/PQ), implement controls, train personnel. Applies to pharma, devices, biotech; phased approach with governance, vendor oversight. Ongoing via change control, audits.

ISO 22000 Details

What It Is

ISO 22000:2018 is the international standard specifying requirements for a Food Safety Management System (FSMS). It is a certifiable framework enabling organizations in the food chain to provide safe products, prevent hazards, and meet regulatory/customer needs. Its risk-based approach integrates HACCP principles with two nested PDCA cycles—organizational and operational—for comprehensive control.

Key Components

10 clauses aligned with **High-Level Structure (HLS)context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
Core elements: PRPs, hazard analysis, CCPs/OPRPs, traceability, emergency response, interactive communication.
Built on Codex HACCP and management system discipline.
Voluntary certification model via accredited bodies.

Why Organizations Use It

Demonstrates compliance, reduces contamination/recall risks.
Enhances supply chain trust, market access (e.g., GFSI via FSSC 22000).
Drives efficiency, resilience, competitive differentiation.
Builds stakeholder confidence through auditable governance.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, PRPs/hazard planning, training, verification, audits.
Scalable for all sizes/industries globally in food chain.
Certification requires stage 1/2 audits, annual surveillance.

Key Differences

Aspect	FDA 21 CFR Part 11	ISO 22000
Scope	Electronic records/signatures trustworthiness	Food safety management systems/hazards
Industry	FDA-regulated pharma/devices/biologics	All food chain organizations globally
Nature	Mandatory US regulation/enforced	Voluntary international certification standard
Testing	System validation/audit trails required	Internal audits/management reviews/certification
Penalties	Warning letters/product holds/enforcement	Loss of certification/market exclusion

Scope

FDA 21 CFR Part 11

Electronic records/signatures trustworthiness

ISO 22000

Food safety management systems/hazards

Industry

FDA 21 CFR Part 11

FDA-regulated pharma/devices/biologics

ISO 22000

All food chain organizations globally

Nature

FDA 21 CFR Part 11

Mandatory US regulation/enforced

ISO 22000

Voluntary international certification standard

Testing

FDA 21 CFR Part 11

System validation/audit trails required

ISO 22000

Internal audits/management reviews/certification

Penalties

FDA 21 CFR Part 11

Warning letters/product holds/enforcement

ISO 22000

Loss of certification/market exclusion

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and ISO 22000

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 FAQ

ISO 22000 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 Ransomware-Resilience Sprint: A 30-60-90 Day Action Plan (With Evidence Checklist)

Tactical CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 playbook for ransomware resilience. 30-60-90 day sprint with tool-agnostic tasks, ownership & evidence checklists to prove progre

SEC Cybersecurity Rules Materiality Determination Framework: Step-by-Step Guide with Checklists and Real-World Examples

Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 materiality determinations with our step-by-step framework, checklists, case law factors, and real-world examples. Avoid enforceme

The 'Black Box' Risk: Why Human-in-the-Loop is the Ultimate Fail-Safe for 2026 Security Operations

Uncover the black box AI risk in security ops. Learn why human-in-the-loop auditing is crucial for 2026. Upskill analysts to ensure data privacy and robust secu

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

UL Certification vs GLBA

Discover UL Certification vs GLBA: UL ensures product safety via marks, testing & audits; GLBA mandates financial data privacy & safeguards. Compare requirements & boost compliance now!

UAE PDPL vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

Compare UAE PDPL vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Breach timelines, governance, risk mgmt differences revealed. Master global compliance strategies today!

J-SOX vs ISO 22301

Discover J-SOX vs ISO 22301: Principles-based ICFR for finance vs PDCA-driven BCMS resilience. Boost compliance, cut risks—expert guide inside!

FDA 21 CFR Part 11

ISO 22000

Quick Verdict

FDA 21 CFR Part 11

Key Features

ISO 22000

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 22000 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 FAQ

What is the primary objective of FDA 21 CFR Part 11?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with FDA 21 CFR Part 11?

Does FDA 21 CFR Part 11 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for FDA 21 CFR Part 11 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with FDA 21 CFR Part 11?

Can FDA 21 CFR Part 11 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing FDA 21 CFR Part 11?

ISO 22000 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 22000?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 22000?

Does ISO 22000 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 22000 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 22000?

Can ISO 22000 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 22000?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 Ransomware-Resilience Sprint: A 30-60-90 Day Action Plan (With Evidence Checklist)

SEC Cybersecurity Rules Materiality Determination Framework: Step-by-Step Guide with Checklists and Real-World Examples

The 'Black Box' Risk: Why Human-in-the-Loop is the Ultimate Fail-Safe for 2026 Security Operations

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

UL Certification vs GLBA

UAE PDPL vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

J-SOX vs ISO 22301