FDA 21 CFR Part 11
FDA regulation for electronic records and signatures equivalency
ISO 22301
International standard for business continuity management systems
Quick Verdict
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 mandates electronic records/signatures equivalence for US life sciences, ensuring data integrity via validation. ISO 22301 provides voluntary BCMS framework globally for resilience against disruptions. Companies adopt Part 11 for FDA compliance, 22301 for operational continuity.
FDA 21 CFR Part 11
21 CFR Part 11: Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures
Key Features
- Establishes equivalency criteria for electronic records to paper
- Mandates secure time-stamped audit trails for actions
- Requires unique non-repudiable electronic signatures
- Defines distinct controls for closed and open systems
- Enforces risk-based validation and access controls
ISO 22301
ISO 22301:2019 Business continuity management systems Requirements
Key Features
- PDCA cycle for continual BCMS improvement
- Business Impact Analysis (BIA) and risk assessment
- Leadership commitment and policy requirements
- Operational planning with testing and exercises
- Seamless integration with ISO 27001 and others
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Details
What It Is
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 is a U.S. regulation defining criteria for electronic records and electronic signatures to be trustworthy, reliable, and equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures. It targets FDA-regulated industries using electronic systems for predicate-rule records like batch records or submissions. The primary approach is control-based, with narrow scope and risk-based enforcement discretion outlined in the 2003 FDA guidance.
Key Components
- **SubpartsGeneral provisions, electronic records (closed/open systems controls), electronic signatures.
- Core controls include validation (§11.10(a)), audit trails (§11.10(e)), access limits (§11.10(d)), authority/device checks (§11.10(g)(h)), training (§11.10(i)), and documentation (§11.10(k)).
- Signature rules: manifestation (§11.50), linking (§11.70), uniqueness (§11.100), multi-component (§11.200).
- Compliance via internal validation, no external certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory when relying on electronic records for regulated activities.
- Ensures data integrity, non-repudiation, and inspection readiness.
- Mitigates risks of warnings, holds, recalls.
- Drives efficiency in digital transformation and quality systems.
- Builds FDA and stakeholder confidence.
Implementation Overview
- Risk-based: scope records, classify systems, CSV (IQ/OQ/PQ), SOPs, training.
- Phased approach: governance, gap analysis, validation, deployment, monitoring.
- Applies to pharma, biotech, devices globally; scales by organization size.
- FDA inspections verify compliance.
ISO 22301 Details
What It Is
ISO 22301:2019 is the international standard titled "Security and resilience — Business continuity management systems — Requirements." It is a certifiable framework for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving a Business Continuity Management System (BCMS). Its primary purpose is to enhance organizational resilience against disruptions like cyberattacks, pandemics, and natural disasters through a risk-based PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) approach.
Key Components
- 10 clauses structured around Annex SL high-level structure, with Clauses 4-10 forming the PDCA core.
- Key elements: context analysis (Clause 4), leadership commitment (5), BIA and risk assessment (6/8), support resources (7), operations/testing (8), evaluation/audits (9), and improvement (10).
- No fixed controls; flexible, tailored requirements.
- Certification via accredited bodies: two-stage audits, 3-year validity with annual surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Builds resilience, reduces downtime/financial losses, ensures regulatory compliance (e.g., NIS Directive).
- Enhances stakeholder trust, reputation, competitive edges like procurement advantages.
- Proactive risk management via BIA/RTO, integrates with ISO 27001.
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: gap analysis, BIA, policy development, training, testing, audits.
- Applicable to all sizes/sectors; 60 days possible with tools.
- Certification in 6-8 weeks post-readiness.
Key Differences
| Aspect | FDA 21 CFR Part 11 | ISO 22301 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Electronic records/signatures trustworthiness | Business continuity management system resilience |
| Industry | FDA-regulated life sciences, US-focused | All sectors worldwide, any organization |
| Nature | Mandatory US regulation, enforced by FDA | Voluntary international certification standard |
| Testing | Risk-based system validation, audit trails | BIA, exercises, internal/external audits |
| Penalties | Warning letters, fines, product holds | Loss of certification, no legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and ISO 22301
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 FAQ
ISO 22301 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 5 Audit Survival Secrets for Your First SOC 2 Type 2: What Auditors Really Check (and How to Pass)
Master your first SOC 2 Type 2 audit with proven strategies: 40-sample testing, vendor gaps, CPA walkthroughs. Get checklists, scripts & tips from SignWell to s

One Step at a Time - a 6 Month Plan to Live and Breath DORA
Achieve DORA compliance in 6 months with our detailed plan. Learn implementation sequence, starting steps, pitfalls to avoid, and accelerators for success. Toug

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIST CSF in Your Organization
Master NIST CSF implementation in your organization with this detailed guide. Learn core functions, key steps, best practices, and tips for cybersecurity succes
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs ISO 14064
Compare FDA 21 CFR Part 11 electronic records rules vs ISO 14064 GHG standards. Uncover validation, audit trails, boundaries & verification diffs for compliance. Expert guide boosts your edge!
EPA vs PDPA
Compare EPA vs PDPA: Decode key differences in compliance, enforcement & strategy for environmental standards vs data protection laws. Boost your regulatory mastery—explore now!
ISO 27018 vs AS9110C
Discover ISO 27018 vs AS9110C: Cloud PII privacy code vs aerospace MRO QMS. Key diffs, controls, benefits for compliance. Secure your ops now!