Standards Comparison

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11

    Mandatory
    1997

    FDA regulation for electronic records and signatures equivalency

    VS

    ISO 22301

    Voluntary
    2019

    International standard for business continuity management systems

    Quick Verdict

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11 mandates electronic records/signatures equivalence for US life sciences, ensuring data integrity via validation. ISO 22301 provides voluntary BCMS framework globally for resilience against disruptions. Companies adopt Part 11 for FDA compliance, 22301 for operational continuity.

    Electronic Records

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11

    21 CFR Part 11: Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Establishes equivalency criteria for electronic records to paper
    • Mandates secure time-stamped audit trails for actions
    • Requires unique non-repudiable electronic signatures
    • Defines distinct controls for closed and open systems
    • Enforces risk-based validation and access controls
    Business Continuity

    ISO 22301

    ISO 22301:2019 Business continuity management systems Requirements

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    0-6 months

    Key Features

    • PDCA cycle for continual BCMS improvement
    • Business Impact Analysis (BIA) and risk assessment
    • Leadership commitment and policy requirements
    • Operational planning with testing and exercises
    • Seamless integration with ISO 27001 and others

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Details

    What It Is

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11 is a U.S. regulation defining criteria for electronic records and electronic signatures to be trustworthy, reliable, and equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures. It targets FDA-regulated industries using electronic systems for predicate-rule records like batch records or submissions. The primary approach is control-based, with narrow scope and risk-based enforcement discretion outlined in the 2003 FDA guidance.

    Key Components

    • **SubpartsGeneral provisions, electronic records (closed/open systems controls), electronic signatures.
    • Core controls include validation (§11.10(a)), audit trails (§11.10(e)), access limits (§11.10(d)), authority/device checks (§11.10(g)(h)), training (§11.10(i)), and documentation (§11.10(k)).
    • Signature rules: manifestation (§11.50), linking (§11.70), uniqueness (§11.100), multi-component (§11.200).
    • Compliance via internal validation, no external certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory when relying on electronic records for regulated activities.
    • Ensures data integrity, non-repudiation, and inspection readiness.
    • Mitigates risks of warnings, holds, recalls.
    • Drives efficiency in digital transformation and quality systems.
    • Builds FDA and stakeholder confidence.

    Implementation Overview

    • Risk-based: scope records, classify systems, CSV (IQ/OQ/PQ), SOPs, training.
    • Phased approach: governance, gap analysis, validation, deployment, monitoring.
    • Applies to pharma, biotech, devices globally; scales by organization size.
    • FDA inspections verify compliance.

    ISO 22301 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 22301:2019 is the international standard titled "Security and resilience — Business continuity management systems — Requirements." It is a certifiable framework for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving a Business Continuity Management System (BCMS). Its primary purpose is to enhance organizational resilience against disruptions like cyberattacks, pandemics, and natural disasters through a risk-based PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) approach.

    Key Components

    • 10 clauses structured around Annex SL high-level structure, with Clauses 4-10 forming the PDCA core.
    • Key elements: context analysis (Clause 4), leadership commitment (5), BIA and risk assessment (6/8), support resources (7), operations/testing (8), evaluation/audits (9), and improvement (10).
    • No fixed controls; flexible, tailored requirements.
    • Certification via accredited bodies: two-stage audits, 3-year validity with annual surveillance.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Builds resilience, reduces downtime/financial losses, ensures regulatory compliance (e.g., NIS Directive).
    • Enhances stakeholder trust, reputation, competitive edges like procurement advantages.
    • Proactive risk management via BIA/RTO, integrates with ISO 27001.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased approach: gap analysis, BIA, policy development, training, testing, audits.
    • Applicable to all sizes/sectors; 60 days possible with tools.
    • Certification in 6-8 weeks post-readiness.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11
    Electronic records/signatures trustworthiness
    ISO 22301
    Business continuity management system resilience

    Industry

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11
    FDA-regulated life sciences, US-focused
    ISO 22301
    All sectors worldwide, any organization

    Nature

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11
    Mandatory US regulation, enforced by FDA
    ISO 22301
    Voluntary international certification standard

    Testing

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11
    Risk-based system validation, audit trails
    ISO 22301
    BIA, exercises, internal/external audits

    Penalties

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11
    Warning letters, fines, product holds
    ISO 22301
    Loss of certification, no legal penalties

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and ISO 22301

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11 FAQ

    ISO 22301 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages