FDA 21 CFR Part 11
FDA regulation for trustworthy electronic records and signatures
ISO 27017
Code of practice for cloud-specific information security controls
Quick Verdict
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 mandates electronic records/signatures trustworthy for life sciences, while ISO 27017 provides voluntary cloud security guidance for all industries. Companies adopt Part 11 for FDA compliance, ISO 27017 for global cloud assurance.
FDA 21 CFR Part 11
21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures
Key Features
- Establishes equivalency of electronic records to paper records
- Mandates secure, time-stamped audit trails for changes
- Requires unique electronic signatures with non-repudiation
- Differentiates controls for closed versus open systems
- Applies risk-based enforcement discretion via FDA guidance
ISO 27017
ISO/IEC 27017:2015
Key Features
- Clarifies shared responsibilities between CSPs and CSCs
- Introduces 7 cloud-specific CLD security controls
- Provides guidance for 37 ISO 27002 controls in cloud
- Addresses multi-tenancy segregation and VM hardening
- Integrates as extension to ISO 27001 ISMS audits
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Details
What It Is
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 is a U.S. regulation establishing criteria for electronic records and electronic signatures to be trustworthy, reliable, and equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures. It applies to FDA-regulated industries using electronic systems for predicate-rule records, employing a risk-based approach narrowed by 2003 FDA guidance.
Key Components
- Subparts A-C cover scope, electronic records (closed/open systems controls like validation, audit trails, access), and signatures (manifestation, linking, uniqueness).
- Core controls: access limitation, operational/authority/device checks, training, accountability policies.
- No fixed control count; focuses on authenticity, integrity, non-repudiation.
- Compliance via validation, not certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets legal obligations for electronic recordkeeping in pharma, devices, biotech.
- Mitigates enforcement risks (warnings, holds).
- Enhances data integrity, inspection readiness, efficiency.
- Builds trust with regulators, partners.
Implementation Overview
- Risk-based scoping, CSV (IQ/OQ/PQ), SOPs, training.
- Phased: gap analysis, validation, go-live, monitoring.
- Targets life sciences; U.S.-focused but global relevance.
- No external certification; FDA inspection demonstrates compliance.
ISO 27017 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27017:2015 is an international code of practice providing cloud-specific guidance for information security controls within an ISO 27001 ISMS. It extends ISO/IEC 27002 with tailored implementation advice for cloud environments, focusing on shared responsibilities, multi-tenancy, and virtualization risks across IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS models using a risk-based approach.
Key Components
- Additional guidance for 37 ISO 27002 controls adapted to cloud contexts
- 7 new CLD controls covering shared roles, asset lifecycle, VM segregation/hardening, admin operations, monitoring, and network alignment
- Structured around ISO 27002 domains like access control and operations security
- Assessed via ISO 27001 audits, not standalone certification
Why Organizations Use It
- Clarifies CSP-CSC responsibilities to prevent security gaps
- Meets regulatory (GDPR/CCPA) and procurement demands
- Reduces cloud incident risks like misconfigurations
- Enhances trust, differentiation for CSPs, and due diligence for customers
Implementation Overview
- Integrate into ISO 27001 ISMS through risk assessment and control mapping
- Activities: document responsibilities, configure segregation/monitoring, update SLAs
- Suits CSPs/CSCs globally, all sizes; joint audits typically 9-12 months
Key Differences
| Aspect | FDA 21 CFR Part 11 | ISO 27017 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Electronic records/signatures equivalence to paper | Cloud-specific information security controls |
| Industry | FDA-regulated life sciences (pharma, devices) | All industries using cloud services globally |
| Nature | Mandatory U.S. FDA regulation | Voluntary ISO guidance/code of practice |
| Testing | Risk-based system validation, audit trails | ISO 27001 audits with cloud control assessment |
| Penalties | Warning letters, enforcement actions | No legal penalties, certification loss |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and ISO 27017
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 FAQ
ISO 27017 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Real-World ISO 27701 Success: Synthesized Case Studies, Metrics, and Lessons for Privacy Resilience
Real-world ISO 27701 success from Tribeca, Kocho: DSAR efficiency gains, risk score reductions, certification ROI. Synthesized metrics prove privacy resilience

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2
Use CIS Controls v8.1 as your compliance on-ramp. Map one security program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2 without duplicating work via practical mapp

How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)
Deploy CIS Controls v8.1 as a control backbone for NIS2 & DORA compliance. Step-by-step roadmap (IG1→IG2), deliverables, metrics & evidence model for hybrid/clo
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
LGPD vs IFS Food
Compare LGPD vs IFS Food: Brazil's data privacy law meets global food safety standard. Uncover key differences in principles, enforcement, compliance for seamless business strategy. (152 characters)
EMAS vs APRA CPS 234
Compare EMAS vs APRA CPS 234: EU eco-management scheme meets Australia's info security standard. Unlock compliance strategies, key differences & implementation tips. Read now!
NIST CSF vs GRI
Compare NIST CSF vs GRI: NIST excels in cyber risk governance (Govern-ID-Protect); GRI drives sustainability impacts (HES/OHS). Align strategies—boost compliance now!