Standards Comparison

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11

    Mandatory
    1997

    US FDA regulation for trustworthy electronic records/signatures

    VS

    ISO 55001

    Voluntary
    2014

    International standard for asset management systems

    Quick Verdict

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11 mandates electronic records/signatures trustworthiness for life sciences compliance, while ISO 55001 provides voluntary asset management systems for lifecycle value optimization. Pharma adopts Part 11 for FDA enforcement; asset-heavy firms use ISO 55001 for strategic governance.

    Electronic Records

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11

    21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Establishes equivalency criteria for electronic records/signatures
    • Mandates secure, time-stamped audit trails for changes
    • Requires validation ensuring accuracy and integrity detection
    • Enforces unique multi-component electronic signatures
    • Distinguishes controls for closed vs open systems
    Asset Management

    ISO 55001

    ISO 55001: Asset management — Management systems — Requirements

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Strategic Asset Management Plan (SAMP) requirement
    • Annex SL structure for integration with other standards
    • Formal asset decision-making framework
    • Explicit risk and opportunity management
    • Lifecycle value realization and PDCA cycle

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Details

    What It Is

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11 is a US federal regulation establishing criteria for electronic records and electronic signatures to be trustworthy, reliable, and equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures. It applies to FDA-regulated industries using electronic systems for predicate-rule-required records. The risk-based approach, clarified in 2003 guidance, narrows scope to relied-upon electronic records while enforcing core controls.

    Key Components

    • **Subpart BControls for closed (§11.10: validation, audit trails, access) and open systems (§11.30: encryption, digital signatures).
    • **Subpart CElectronic signatures (unique, linked, multi-component).
    • Core principles: authenticity, integrity, non-repudiation.
    • No formal certification; compliance via inspection readiness and predicate rule alignment.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Ensures data integrity for quality decisions, avoids enforcement actions like warning letters, mitigates recalls. Provides strategic efficiency in digital transformation, builds regulator/partner trust, supports global harmonization (e.g., EU Annex 11).

    Implementation Overview

    Risk-based CSV lifecycle: scoping, validation (IQ/OQ/PQ), SOPs, training. Targets life sciences (pharma, devices); multi-phase (6-24+ months) with vendor governance for SaaS/cloud. FDA inspections verify controls.

    ISO 55001 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 55001:2024 is the international standard specifying requirements for an Asset Management System (AMS). It provides a management system framework to establish, implement, maintain, and improve asset management, enabling organizations to realize value from assets across their lifecycles. The primary scope covers asset-intensive organizations, using a risk-based, PDCA-aligned approach structured per Annex SL.

    Key Components

    • Clauses 4-10: Context, Leadership, Planning, Support, Operation, Performance Evaluation, Improvement.
    • 72 'shall' requirements focused on SAMP, decision frameworks, risks/opportunities.
    • Built on ISO 55000 principles; supports certification via audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Drives cost optimization, risk reduction, performance balancing.
    • Meets regulatory/stakeholder expectations; enhances resilience.
    • Builds trust via certification; integrates with ISO 9001/14001.
    • Competitive edge in utilities, infrastructure, manufacturing.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, SAMP development, training, audits.
    • Applies to all sizes/sectors; 12-24 months typical.
    • Optional third-party certification with surveillance audits. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11
    Electronic records/signatures trustworthiness
    ISO 55001
    Asset management system lifecycle value

    Industry

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11
    FDA-regulated life sciences/pharma
    ISO 55001
    Asset-intensive sectors globally

    Nature

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11
    Mandatory US FDA regulation
    ISO 55001
    Voluntary international certification standard

    Testing

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11
    System validation, audit trails
    ISO 55001
    Internal audits, management reviews

    Penalties

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11
    Warning letters, enforcement actions
    ISO 55001
    Loss of certification, no legal penalties

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and ISO 55001

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11 FAQ

    ISO 55001 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages