FDA 21 CFR Part 11
US FDA regulation for trustworthy electronic records/signatures
ISO 55001
International standard for asset management systems
Quick Verdict
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 mandates electronic records/signatures trustworthiness for life sciences compliance, while ISO 55001 provides voluntary asset management systems for lifecycle value optimization. Pharma adopts Part 11 for FDA enforcement; asset-heavy firms use ISO 55001 for strategic governance.
FDA 21 CFR Part 11
21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures
Key Features
- Establishes equivalency criteria for electronic records/signatures
- Mandates secure, time-stamped audit trails for changes
- Requires validation ensuring accuracy and integrity detection
- Enforces unique multi-component electronic signatures
- Distinguishes controls for closed vs open systems
ISO 55001
ISO 55001: Asset management — Management systems — Requirements
Key Features
- Strategic Asset Management Plan (SAMP) requirement
- Annex SL structure for integration with other standards
- Formal asset decision-making framework
- Explicit risk and opportunity management
- Lifecycle value realization and PDCA cycle
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Details
What It Is
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 is a US federal regulation establishing criteria for electronic records and electronic signatures to be trustworthy, reliable, and equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures. It applies to FDA-regulated industries using electronic systems for predicate-rule-required records. The risk-based approach, clarified in 2003 guidance, narrows scope to relied-upon electronic records while enforcing core controls.
Key Components
- **Subpart BControls for closed (§11.10: validation, audit trails, access) and open systems (§11.30: encryption, digital signatures).
- **Subpart CElectronic signatures (unique, linked, multi-component).
- Core principles: authenticity, integrity, non-repudiation.
- No formal certification; compliance via inspection readiness and predicate rule alignment.
Why Organizations Use It
Ensures data integrity for quality decisions, avoids enforcement actions like warning letters, mitigates recalls. Provides strategic efficiency in digital transformation, builds regulator/partner trust, supports global harmonization (e.g., EU Annex 11).
Implementation Overview
Risk-based CSV lifecycle: scoping, validation (IQ/OQ/PQ), SOPs, training. Targets life sciences (pharma, devices); multi-phase (6-24+ months) with vendor governance for SaaS/cloud. FDA inspections verify controls.
ISO 55001 Details
What It Is
ISO 55001:2024 is the international standard specifying requirements for an Asset Management System (AMS). It provides a management system framework to establish, implement, maintain, and improve asset management, enabling organizations to realize value from assets across their lifecycles. The primary scope covers asset-intensive organizations, using a risk-based, PDCA-aligned approach structured per Annex SL.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10: Context, Leadership, Planning, Support, Operation, Performance Evaluation, Improvement.
- 72 'shall' requirements focused on SAMP, decision frameworks, risks/opportunities.
- Built on ISO 55000 principles; supports certification via audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Drives cost optimization, risk reduction, performance balancing.
- Meets regulatory/stakeholder expectations; enhances resilience.
- Builds trust via certification; integrates with ISO 9001/14001.
- Competitive edge in utilities, infrastructure, manufacturing.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, SAMP development, training, audits.
- Applies to all sizes/sectors; 12-24 months typical.
- Optional third-party certification with surveillance audits. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | FDA 21 CFR Part 11 | ISO 55001 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Electronic records/signatures trustworthiness | Asset management system lifecycle value |
| Industry | FDA-regulated life sciences/pharma | Asset-intensive sectors globally |
| Nature | Mandatory US FDA regulation | Voluntary international certification standard |
| Testing | System validation, audit trails | Internal audits, management reviews |
| Penalties | Warning letters, enforcement actions | Loss of certification, no legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and ISO 55001
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 FAQ
ISO 55001 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CMMC Scoping Mastery for Defense Supply Chains: Enclave Mapping, Subcontractor Flow-Down, and CUI Inventory Blueprint
Master CMMC scoping for DIB: delineate FCI/CUI boundaries, segment enclaves, manage subcontractor flow-down. Prevent 80% assessment failures with SSP templates,

SEC Cybersecurity Rules Implementation Guide: Mastering Form 8-K Item 1.05 Materiality Determination and 4-Business-Day Reporting Workflow
Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 compliance with step-by-step materiality assessment, incident workflows & Inline XBRL tagging. Beat the 4-business-day clock. Esse

NIST CSF 2.0 Supply Chain Risk Management: Complete Playbook with Profiles, Tiers, and Vendor Assessment Templates
Master NIST CSF 2.0 ID.SC supply chain risk management with vendor assessment templates, profile gap analysis, and tier strategies. Mitigate third-party threats
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISA 95 vs BREEAM
Discover ISA 95 vs BREEAM: Compare manufacturing integration (ISA-95) with building sustainability certification. Unlock synergies for efficient, resilient factories. Boost compliance & ROI now!
CAA vs ISO 14064
CAA vs ISO 14064: Contrast US Clean Air Act's air regs with global GHG standards. Master NAAQS, SIPs, Title V vs ISO inventory, verification for compliance edge. Optimize now!
ISO 14001 vs IEC 62443
Discover ISO 14001 vs IEC 62443: Compare EMS for sustainability with IACS cybersecurity standards. Enhance compliance, risk management & integration. Unlock expert insights now!