What is the primary objective of **FDA 21 CFR Part 11**?

**The primary objective of FDA 21 CFR Part 11 is to establish criteria under which the FDA considers electronic records and electronic signatures trustworthy, reliable, and equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures (§11.1(a)).** This equivalency enables electronic methods while ensuring authenticity, integrity, availability, and non-repudiation through controls like validation (§11.10(a)), secure audit trails (§11.10(e)), access limitations (§11.10(d)), and electronic signature requirements (§§11.50–11.300).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **FDA 21 CFR Part 11**?

**FDA 21 CFR Part 11 applies to organizations using electronic records created, modified, maintained, archived, retrieved, or transmitted under predicate rules, or relied upon for regulated activities (§11.1(b)).** This includes pharmaceutical, biotech, medical device, and CRO/CMO firms maintaining GxP records (e.g., batch records, stability data) electronically in lieu of paper, or submitting accepted electronic records to FDA. Paper-reliant firms or non-predicate records are generally excluded per 2003 guidance.

Does **FDA 21 CFR Part 11** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, FDA 21 CFR Part 11 does not require external audits or third-party certification.** Compliance is demonstrated through internal controls, validation (§11.10(a)), SOPs, training (§11.10(i)), and inspection readiness (§11.1(e)), with systems and documentation available for FDA review. FDA exercises enforcement discretion on some elements but enforces predicate rules and core controls like access and signatures.

How often should an assessment for **FDA 21 CFR Part 11** be performed?

**FDA 21 CFR Part 11 does not prescribe a fixed frequency for assessments; organizations must perform periodic reviews tied to change control, risk assessments, and predicate rule requirements.** Best practice includes annual management reviews, post-change revalidation, and ongoing monitoring of audit trails, access, and system fitness per GAMP lifecycle principles and 2003 guidance.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **FDA 21 CFR Part 11**?

**Non-compliance with FDA 21 CFR Part 11 can result in FDA Form 483 observations, warning letters, product holds, import alerts, or injunctions, as records must still meet enforceable predicate rules.** Examples include data integrity failures leading to inadequate OOS investigations or CAPA, with potential civil penalties up to $10,000 per violation and reputational damage.

Can **FDA 21 CFR Part 11** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, FDA 21 CFR Part 11 controls can be mapped to frameworks like EU Annex 11 for similar electronic record/signature equivalency, though mappings require risk-based analysis of differences in scope and enforcement.** Core elements like audit trails, access controls, and validation align, supporting harmonized GxP compliance.

What is the first step to begin implementing **FDA 21 CFR Part 11**?

**The first step to implement FDA 21 CFR Part 11 is to establish a formal applicability framework mapping predicate rules to records and assessing business reliance on electronic versions (per 2003 guidance).** Document scope decisions in SOPs, classify systems as closed (§11.3(b)(4)) or open (§11.3(b)(9)), and prioritize risk-based validation.

What is the primary objective of **NIST 800-171**?

**NIST SP 800-171 provides recommended security requirements for protecting the confidentiality of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in nonfederal systems and organizations.** Requirements apply to components that process, store, transmit CUI, or provide protection for such components. **Revision 3 (r3), effective May 2024**, supersedes r2 with 17 families including new areas like Planning (PL), System and Services Acquisition (SA), and Supply Chain Risk Management (SR), using SP 800-53 r5 language and Organization-Defined Parameters (ODPs).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **NIST 800-171**?

**Nonfederal organizations handling CUI via federal contracts, grants, or agreements must implement NIST SP 800-171.** This includes DoD contractors and subcontractors under DFARS 252.204-7012 for covered contractor information systems processing Covered Defense Information (CDI). Applicability is contract-driven; exclusions apply to COTS-only acquisitions or FISMA-operated systems.

Does **NIST 800-171** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, NIST SP 800-171 does not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** Compliance is demonstrated via self-assessment using SP 800-171A r3 procedures (examine/interview/test). DoD may require SPRS score submission or CMMC Level 2 certification, but the standard itself relies on SSP and POA&M documentation.

How often should an assessment for **NIST 800-171** be performed?

**Organizations must perform and document security assessments at an organization-defined frequency in the SSP, typically annually for DoD contractors.** SP 800-171 r2 3.12.1 requires periodic assessments; r3 emphasizes continuous monitoring via Security Assessment and Monitoring (CA). DFARS and CMMC dictate annual self-assessments or triennial C3PAO for prioritized contracts.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **NIST 800-171**?

**Non-compliance with NIST SP 800-171 can result in contract ineligibility, termination, or disqualification from DoD bids.** DFARS 252.204-7012 mandates implementation; failures trigger SPRS score penalties (down to -203), remedial demands, False Claims Act risks, and 72-hour incident reporting obligations with forensic support.

Can **NIST 800-171** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, NIST SP 800-171 r2 Appendix D provides explicit mappings to NIST SP 800-53 and ISO 27001.** r3 aligns closely with SP 800-53 r5 baselines. Organizations demonstrate compliance within existing programs via SSP documentation of equivalencies, tailoring, or compensating controls approved by contracting officers.

What is the first step to begin implementing **NIST 800-171**?

**The first step is defining the system boundary and scoping components that process, store, transmit CUI, or protect them.** Develop data flow maps and isolate a CUI security domain using firewalls and boundary protections, as per r2 errata. This informs the SSP and prevents scope explosion.

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs NIST 800-171

Standards Comparison

FDA 21 CFR Part 11

Mandatory

1997

FDA regulation for trustworthy electronic records and signatures

NIST 800-171

Mandatory

2020

U.S. standard protecting CUI in nonfederal systems

Quick Verdict

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 ensures electronic records/signatures equivalent to paper for life sciences, while NIST 800-171 protects CUI confidentiality for DoD contractors. Pharma firms adopt Part 11 for FDA compliance; contractors implement 800-171 for contract eligibility.

Electronic Records

FDA 21 CFR Part 11

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records Electronic Signatures

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Establishes equivalency of electronic records to paper records
Mandates secure, time-stamped audit trails for integrity
Requires validation ensuring system accuracy and reliability
Enforces access, authority, and device checks
Defines non-repudiable electronic signature controls

Controlled Unclassified Information

NIST 800-171

NIST SP 800-171 Revision 3

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Scoped to CUI-processing components and protections
97+ requirements across 17 control families
SSP and POA&M documentation artifacts
Examine/interview/test assessment procedures
FedRAMP Moderate cloud equivalence support

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Details

What It Is

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 is a U.S. regulation defining criteria for electronic records and electronic signatures to be trustworthy, reliable, and equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures. It applies to FDA-regulated industries using electronic systems for predicate rule records. The risk-based approach, per 2003 FDA guidance, narrows scope to relied-upon electronic records, with enforcement discretion on validation, audit trails, retention, and copies.

Key Components

**Subpart AScope, definitions (closed/open systems).
**Subpart BControls (§11.10 closed systems: validation, audit trails, access; §11.30 open systems: encryption/digital signatures).
**Subpart CSignatures (manifestation, linking, uniqueness, multi-component controls). Core principles: authenticity, integrity, non-repudiation. Compliance via validation, SOPs; no formal certification but FDA inspection.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandated for electronic reliance in pharma, devices, biotech; mitigates enforcement risks (warnings, holds); ensures data integrity for decisions; boosts efficiency, inspection readiness.

Implementation Overview

Risk-based CSV (GAMP5): scope records, validate (IQ/OQ/PQ), implement controls, train, change control. For life-sciences; phased (6-24 months); ongoing audits, no external cert.

NIST 800-171 Details

What It Is

NIST Special Publication (SP) 800-171 Revision 3 is a cybersecurity framework providing recommended security requirements to protect Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) confidentiality in nonfederal systems and organizations. It targets federal contractors handling CUI, using a control-based approach tailored from NIST SP 800-53 Moderate baseline and FIPS 200, emphasizing consistent safeguards without full FISMA obligations.

Key Components

17 families (e.g., Access Control, Audit, Supply Chain Risk Management) with ~97 requirements in Rev 3.
Built on SP 800-53 Rev 5 language, Organization-Defined Parameters (ODPs), and mappings to ISO 27001.
Compliance model includes System Security Plan (SSP), Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M), and SP 800-171A assessment procedures (examine/interview/test).

Why Organizations Use It

Contractual mandate via DFARS 252.204-7012 for DoD suppliers.
Mitigates breach risks, ensures procurement eligibility (CMMC Level 2).
Enhances resilience, builds federal stakeholder trust, competitive supply chain advantage.

Implementation Overview

Phased: scoping CUI enclave, gap analysis, controls deployment, SSP/POA&M, continuous monitoring.
Applies to all sizes in defense/government supply chains, U.S.-centric.
Assessments vary: self, C3PAO, or government-led; no universal certification.

Key Differences

Aspect	FDA 21 CFR Part 11	NIST 800-171
Scope	Electronic records/signatures trustworthiness	CUI confidentiality in nonfederal systems
Industry	Life sciences, pharma, medical devices	DoD contractors, federal supply chains
Nature	FDA regulation with enforcement discretion	Contractual security requirements baseline
Testing	Risk-based system validation IQ/OQ/PQ	SP 800-171A examine/interview/test assessments
Penalties	Warning letters, product holds	Contract ineligibility, SPRS score penalties

Scope

FDA 21 CFR Part 11

Electronic records/signatures trustworthiness

NIST 800-171

CUI confidentiality in nonfederal systems

Industry

FDA 21 CFR Part 11

Life sciences, pharma, medical devices

NIST 800-171

DoD contractors, federal supply chains

Nature

FDA 21 CFR Part 11

FDA regulation with enforcement discretion

NIST 800-171

Contractual security requirements baseline

Testing

FDA 21 CFR Part 11

Risk-based system validation IQ/OQ/PQ

NIST 800-171

SP 800-171A examine/interview/test assessments

Penalties

FDA 21 CFR Part 11

Warning letters, product holds

NIST 800-171

Contract ineligibility, SPRS score penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and NIST 800-171

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 FAQ

NIST 800-171 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)

Deploy CIS Controls v8.1 as a control backbone for NIS2 & DORA compliance. Step-by-step roadmap (IG1→IG2), deliverables, metrics & evidence model for hybrid/clo

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation

Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc

ISO 27701 2025 Update: Navigating Standalone Certification Myths, Audit Realities, and a 90-Day PIMS Launch Plan

Debunk ISO 27701 2025 standalone certification myths vs ISO 27001. Get a 90-day PIMS launch roadmap, checklists & audit prep to certify faster amid global priva

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

APPI vs POPIA

APPI vs POPIA: Japan's broad data law (PPC, ¥100M fines, extraterritorial) vs SA's 8-condition framework (IO mandatory, ZAR10M penalties). Master key diffs for seamless compliance.

CMMI vs FedRAMP

Compare CMMI vs FedRAMP: Process maturity drives software predictability; FedRAMP ensures federal cloud security. Boost compliance, cut risks, win contracts—discover key differences now!

HIPAA vs ENERGY STAR

Compare HIPAA privacy/security rules vs ENERGY STAR efficiency standards. Key insights on compliance, breaches, audits & certification for healthcare/sustainability pros. Dive in!

FDA 21 CFR Part 11

NIST 800-171

Quick Verdict

FDA 21 CFR Part 11

Key Features

NIST 800-171

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

NIST 800-171 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 FAQ

What is the primary objective of FDA 21 CFR Part 11?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with FDA 21 CFR Part 11?

Does FDA 21 CFR Part 11 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for FDA 21 CFR Part 11 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with FDA 21 CFR Part 11?

Can FDA 21 CFR Part 11 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing FDA 21 CFR Part 11?

NIST 800-171 FAQ

What is the primary objective of NIST 800-171?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with NIST 800-171?

Does NIST 800-171 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for NIST 800-171 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with NIST 800-171?

Can NIST 800-171 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing NIST 800-171?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation

ISO 27701 2025 Update: Navigating Standalone Certification Myths, Audit Realities, and a 90-Day PIMS Launch Plan

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

APPI vs POPIA

CMMI vs FedRAMP

HIPAA vs ENERGY STAR