Standards Comparison

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11

    Mandatory
    1997

    FDA regulation for trustworthy electronic records and signatures

    VS

    TOGAF

    Voluntary
    2022

    Global framework for enterprise architecture development

    Quick Verdict

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11 mandates electronic record trustworthiness for life sciences compliance, while TOGAF provides voluntary EA methodology for enterprise-wide IT alignment. Regulated firms adopt Part 11 to avoid enforcement; enterprises use TOGAF for strategic agility and governance.

    Electronic Records

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11

    21 CFR Part 11: Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Establishes equivalency criteria for electronic records to paper
    • Mandates secure, time-stamped audit trails for integrity
    • Requires unique, multi-component electronic signatures non-repudiation
    • Defines distinct controls for closed and open systems
    • Enforces risk-based validation with enforcement discretion
    Enterprise Architecture

    TOGAF

    TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Iterative Architecture Development Method (ADM)
    • Content Framework and Metamodel for artifacts
    • Enterprise Continuum for asset classification and reuse
    • Reference models including TRM and III-RM
    • Architecture Capability Framework for governance

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Details

    What It Is

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11 is a U.S. regulation defining criteria under which electronic records and signatures are trustworthy, reliable, and equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures. It governs FDA-regulated industries using electronic systems for predicate rule records like batch records and submissions. Adopts a risk-based approach with narrow scope and enforcement discretion per 2003 guidance.

    Key Components

    • **SubpartsGeneral provisions, electronic records (closed/open systems), electronic signatures.
    • Controls include validation, audit trails, access limits, operational/authority/device checks, training, documentation, signature linking/manifestation.
    • Integrates with predicate rules (e.g., CGMP); emphasizes inspection readiness over certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Ensures data integrity and compliance, avoiding warnings/recalls.
    • Enables paperless efficiency, faster audits, robust CAPA.
    • Builds stakeholder trust, supports digital transformation in pharma/devices.

    Implementation Overview

    • **Risk-based CSVScoping, IQ/OQ/PQ, SOPs, vendor governance.
    • Phased: gap analysis, validation, training, monitoring.
    • Targets life sciences under FDA; demonstrated via inspections.

    TOGAF Details

    What It Is

    TOGAF® Standard (The Open Group Architecture Framework) is a vendor-neutral enterprise architecture framework. Its primary purpose is to design, plan, implement, and govern enterprise-wide change across business and IT. The key methodology is the iterative Architecture Development Method (ADM), supporting tailoring for organizational context.

    Key Components

    • Core pillars: ADM (10 phases including Preliminary, Vision, Business/Data/Application/Technology Architectures, Migration, Governance, Change Management), Content Framework (deliverables, artifacts, building blocks), Enterprise Continuum, reference models (TRM, SIB, III-RM), and Architecture Capability Framework.
    • Content Metamodel formalizes entities like actors, services, data.
    • No fixed controls; focuses on governance, certification via Open Group paths.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Aligns strategy with IT for efficiency, reuse, ROI.
    • Reduces duplication, risk; enables agility in transformations.
    • Builds stakeholder trust through consistent standards.
    • Voluntary but strategic for large enterprises in regulated sectors.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: maturity assessment, pilot ADM cycles, scale governance.
    • Involves tailoring, repository setup, training; suits large organizations across industries.
    • Certification optional; emphasizes capability building over audits. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11
    Electronic records/signatures trustworthiness in regulated systems
    TOGAF
    Enterprise architecture design, planning, governance across domains

    Industry

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11
    Life sciences, pharma, medical devices (US-focused)
    TOGAF
    All industries, global enterprise IT operations

    Nature

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11
    Mandatory US FDA regulation with enforcement discretion
    TOGAF
    Voluntary vendor-neutral EA methodology/framework

    Testing

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11
    Risk-based system validation, audit trails, FDA inspections
    TOGAF
    Iterative ADM phases, maturity assessments, compliance reviews

    Penalties

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11
    Warning letters, product holds, regulatory actions
    TOGAF
    No legal penalties, internal governance failures

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and TOGAF

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11 FAQ

    TOGAF FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages