Standards Comparison

    FedRAMP

    Mandatory
    2011

    U.S. government framework standardizing cloud security authorization

    VS

    ISO 30301

    Voluntary
    2019

    International standard for management systems for records

    Quick Verdict

    FedRAMP standardizes cloud security for US federal agencies via rigorous assessments, while ISO 30301 certifies records management systems globally. Companies adopt FedRAMP for government contracts; ISO 30301 for governance, compliance, and efficiency.

    Cloud Security

    FedRAMP

    Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Assess once, use many times across agencies
    • NIST 800-53 Rev 5 baselines for Low/Moderate/High impacts
    • Independent third-party 3PAO security assessments
    • Continuous monitoring with monthly/quarterly deliverables
    • FedRAMP Marketplace for authorized CSO visibility
    Records Management

    ISO 30301

    ISO 30301:2019 Management systems for records requirements

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • High-Level Structure for MSS integration
    • Normative Annex A operational controls
    • Records requirements analysis (Clause 4.1.2)
    • Flexible conformity pathways
    • Risk-based records planning and objectives

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    FedRAMP Details

    What It Is

    FedRAMP (Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program) is a U.S. government-wide standardized framework for security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring of cloud services (CSOs) used by federal agencies. Its primary purpose is enabling "assess once, use many times" to reduce duplication, based on risk-based FIPS 199 impact levels (Low, Moderate, High) and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls.

    Key Components

    • Baselines with ~156 (Low), ~323 (Moderate), ~410 (High) controls, plus LI-SaaS variant.
    • Core artifacts: SSP, SAR, POA&M, continuous monitoring plans.
    • Built on NIST standards; involves 3PAOs for independent assessments.
    • Agency or Program authorization paths, listed in FedRAMP Marketplace.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Unlocks federal contracts worth $20M+; required for CMMC-compliant vendors.
    • Demonstrates robust security for commercial differentiation.
    • Reduces agency assessment redundancy; builds stakeholder trust.
    • Strategic ROI via revenue and risk mitigation.

    Implementation Overview

    • 12-18 month process: categorization, documentation, 3PAO assessment, authorization.
    • High costs ($150k-$2M+); suits CSPs targeting U.S. federal market.
    • Requires specialized teams, tooling; ongoing quarterly/annual monitoring.

    ISO 30301 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 30301:2019 (Information and documentation — Management systems for records — Requirements) is an international, certifiable standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving a Management System for Records (MSR). It ensures organizations create and control reliable evidence of business activities, supporting mandate, strategy, and goals. The risk-based approach uses the High-Level Structure (HLS) (Clauses 4–10) plus records-specific operations.

    Key Components

    • **Clauses 4–10Context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement
    • **Annex A (normative)Operational controls for records lifecycle
    • Principles: authenticity, reliability, integrity, usability
    • Conformity pathways: self-declaration, external confirmation, third-party certification

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives compliance, risk mitigation (evidence loss, retention failures), efficiency in retrieval/disposition, and integration with ISO 9001/27001. Enhances auditability, transparency, governance, and stakeholder trust.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, policy/roles, processes/systems, training, audits. Scalable for any organization/size/sector; certification optional via accredited bodies.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    FedRAMP
    Cloud security assessment, authorization, monitoring
    ISO 30301
    Records management system governance and operations

    Industry

    FedRAMP
    US federal cloud providers, government contractors
    ISO 30301
    All organizations worldwide, any sector

    Nature

    FedRAMP
    US government program, mandatory for federal cloud
    ISO 30301
    Voluntary international certification standard

    Testing

    FedRAMP
    3PAO assessments, continuous quarterly monitoring
    ISO 30301
    Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits

    Penalties

    FedRAMP
    Loss of authorization, no federal contracts
    ISO 30301
    No legal penalties, loss of certification

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about FedRAMP and ISO 30301

    FedRAMP FAQ

    ISO 30301 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages