FERPA
U.S. federal regulation protecting student education records privacy
IEC 62443
International standard for IACS cybersecurity frameworks
Quick Verdict
FERPA protects U.S. student privacy through access and disclosure controls for education institutions, while IEC 62443 provides risk-based cybersecurity for industrial control systems worldwide. Schools ensure compliance to retain funding; industrial firms adopt for safety, resilience, and supply chain assurance.
FERPA
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)
Key Features
- Grants rights to inspect, amend, control PII disclosures
- Defines expansive PII including linkable indirect identifiers
- Requires 45-day response for education record access
- Enumerates exceptions like school officials and emergencies
- Mandates annual notices and disclosure recordkeeping
IEC 62443
IEC 62443: Security for industrial automation systems
Key Features
- Zones and conduits risk-based segmentation model
- Security levels SL-T, SL-C, SL-A triad
- Shared responsibilities for owners, integrators, suppliers
- Seven foundational requirements FR1-FR7
- ISASecure modular certifications SDLA/CSA/SSA
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
FERPA Details
What It Is
FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, 20 U.S.C. §1232g; 34 CFR Part 99) is a U.S. federal regulation establishing privacy protections for student education records. It grants parents and eligible students rights to access, amend, and control disclosures of personally identifiable information (PII). Scope covers educational agencies receiving federal funds, using a rights-based approach with consent rules and enumerated exceptions.
Key Components
- Core rights: inspect/review (45 days), amend inaccurate records, consent to disclosures.
- PII definition: direct/indirect identifiers, linkable data.
- Exceptions: school officials, emergencies, directory info.
- Compliance via annual notices, disclosure logs; no formal certification, enforced by Dept. of Education.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for federal funding eligibility; mitigates breach risks, lawsuits. Builds student/parent trust, enables safe data sharing. Strategic for edtech vendors, supports analytics under controls.
Implementation Overview
Phased: governance, data inventory, policies/training, technical controls (RBAC, logging), vendor DPAs. Applies to K-12/postsecondary; audits via complaints/enforcement.
IEC 62443 Details
What It Is
IEC 62443 is the international consensus-based standards series (also ISA/IEC 62443) for cybersecurity of Industrial Automation and Control Systems (IACS). It provides a comprehensive framework spanning governance, risk assessment, secure architecture, system/component requirements, and product development lifecycles, tailored for OT environments with unique constraints like availability and safety.
Primary approach: risk-based segmentation via zones/conduits and security levels (SL 0–4).
Key Components
- Four groupings: General (-1), Policies/Procedures (-2), System (-3), Components (-4).
- Seven Foundational Requirements (FR1–7) like IAC, RDF, RA.
- ~140+ component requirements in 62443-4-2; CSMS with maturity levels (ML1–4).
- ISASecure modular certifications (SDLA, CSA, SSA).
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates OT cyber risks to safety/production.
- Meets regulatory references (e.g., NIS-2, NERC CIP complements).
- Enables supplier qualification, insurance benefits.
- Builds trust via certified assurance chain.
Implementation Overview
Phased: governance (2-1), risk/segmentation (3-2), controls (3-3/4-2), certification. Applies to critical infrastructure globally; audits via accredited bodies. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | FERPA | IEC 62443 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Student education records privacy and access rights | Industrial automation control systems cybersecurity |
| Industry | U.S. education (K-12, postsecondary) institutions | Industrial sectors (energy, manufacturing, utilities) globally |
| Nature | U.S. federal privacy law, funding-conditioned enforcement | Voluntary international cybersecurity standards series |
| Testing | Internal processes, complaint investigations, no certification | ISASecure certifications, maturity audits, SL assessments |
| Penalties | Federal funding withholding, third-party access bans | No legal penalties, loss of certification/market access |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about FERPA and IEC 62443
FERPA FAQ
IEC 62443 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Thailand PDPA Implementation Guide: Subordinate Regulations for 72-Hour Breach Reporting and Cross-Border Transfers (2022-2024 Rules)
Step-by-step Thailand PDPA guide: 72-hour breach notifications, cross-border transfers (2022-2024 rules). Risk checklists, GDPR templates avoid THB 5M fines. Mu

ISO 27701 Standalone Certification in 2025: Debunking Myths and Navigating the New Reality
Debunk myths on ISO 27701 standalone certification post-2025. Clarify viability, accreditation bodies, ISO 27001 audit differences & procurement benefits. Guide

Proving CIS Controls v8.1 Works: A KPI & Evidence Framework for Board Reporting, Audits, and Continuous Assurance
Prove CIS Controls v8.1 effectiveness with KPI catalog, evidence checklist & reporting cadence. Ideal for board reports, audits & cyber-insurance. Measure outco
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
SQF vs ISO 27701
Compare SQF vs ISO 27701: SQF drives HACCP-based food safety & GMP excellence; ISO 27701 powers privacy management systems. Gain compliance edge—explore differences now!
NIS2 vs CSA
Discover NIS2 vs CSA: Compare scopes, risk mgmt, reporting & fines. Master EU cyber compliance, avoid €10M penalties—read now!
ITIL vs GMP
ITIL vs GMP: Compare ITIL's agile ITSM framework (87% adoption, 34 practices) with GMP's strict manufacturing standards for compliance & quality. Choose wisely for peak efficiency!