What is the primary objective of **FERPA**?

**FERPA’s primary objective is to protect the privacy of parents and students by regulating access to and disclosure of personally identifiable information (PII) in education records.** Enacted in 1974 as section 444 of the General Education Provisions Act (20 U.S.C. § 1232g), with regulations at 34 CFR Part 99, it grants rights to inspect records within 45 days (§99.10), seek amendments for inaccurate or misleading content (§99.20), and require signed consent for disclosures unless exceptions apply (§99.30).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **FERPA**?

**FERPA applies to educational agencies or institutions receiving funds under any program administered by the U.S. Secretary of Education, including via student aid like Pell Grants (34 CFR §99.1).** Coverage extends institution-wide to all components maintaining education records (§99.1(d)), such as K-12 districts, postsecondary institutions, and their vendors acting as school officials under direct control (§99.31(a)(1)(i)(B)). Non-recipients of funds are exempt (§99.1(b)).

Does **FERPA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, FERPA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** Compliance is demonstrated through internal controls like annual notifications (§99.7), disclosure recordkeeping (§99.32), and policies for access and amendments. The Department of Education’s Family Policy Compliance Office investigates complaints but relies on institutional records, not formal certifications.

How often should an assessment for **FERPA** be performed?

**FERPA requires annual notification of rights to parents or eligible students (§99.7(a)), but does not specify assessment frequency.** Institutions should conduct regular internal reviews of policies, access controls, vendor contracts, and disclosure logs aligned with operational needs, such as access reviews every 1-2 months for high-risk roles and periodic data inventories to ensure ongoing compliance.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **FERPA**?

**Non-compliance can result in Department of Education enforcement, including withholding federal funds, cease-and-desist orders, or termination of funding eligibility (34 CFR §99.67(a)).** Third-party violators face five-year PII access bans (§99.67(c)-(e)); complaints trigger investigations by the Family Policy Compliance Office, potentially leading to corrective actions and reputational harm.

Can **FERPA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**FERPA is a U.S.-specific statute and does not formally map to international frameworks.** Its controls for PII protection, consent, and disclosures may align conceptually with elements like data minimization or access rights in other regimes, but institutions must address differences independently, such as stricter state laws or varying enforcement models.

What is the first step to begin implementing **FERPA**?

**The first step is to publish an annual notification of FERPA rights to parents of students in attendance or eligible students (34 CFR §99.7(a)).** This must detail inspection procedures, amendment processes, consent requirements, complaint filing, and—if used—criteria for school officials and legitimate educational interests (§99.7(a)(3)).

What is the primary objective of **NIST 800-171**?

**NIST SP 800-171 provides recommended security requirements for protecting the confidentiality of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in nonfederal systems and organizations.** Revision 3 (r3), superseding r2 on May 14, 2024, organizes ~97 requirements into 17 families, derived from SP 800-53 r5 Moderate baseline, applying to components that process, store, transmit CUI, or protect such components. It mandates System Security Plans (SSPs) and Plans of Action and Milestones (POA&Ms) for implementation evidence.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **NIST 800-171**?

**Nonfederal organizations handling CUI via federal contracts, grants, or agreements must comply with NIST SP 800-171.** This includes DoD contractors and subcontractors under DFARS 252.204-7012 for covered contractor information systems processing Covered Defense Information (CDI). Applicability targets systems not operated on behalf of agencies under FISMA, excluding COTS-only contracts.

Does **NIST 800-171** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, NIST SP 800-171 does not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** Compliance is demonstrated via self-assessments using SP 800-171A r3 procedures (examine/interview/test), producing SSPs and POA&Ms. DoD may require SPRS score postings or CMMC Level 2 assessments by C3PAOs for certain contracts.

How often should an assessment for **NIST 800-171** be performed?

**NIST SP 800-171 requires periodic security assessments aligned with organizational risk management processes.** SP 800-171A r3 supports annual self-assessments for DoD contractors via SPRS, with more frequent reviews for changes or incidents. Continuous monitoring via audit logs and metrics sustains compliance.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **NIST 800-171**?

**Non-compliance with NIST SP 800-171 risks contract ineligibility, termination, and DoD SPRS score penalties up to -203.** DFARS 252.204-7012 violations trigger 72-hour incident reporting failures, remedial demands, False Claims Act liability, debarment from bids, and reputational damage in federal supply chains.

Can **NIST 800-171** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, NIST SP 800-171 r2 Appendix D maps requirements to NIST SP 800-53 and ISO 27001 controls.** r3 aligns closely with SP 800-53 r5, enabling integration into existing programs while maintaining CUI-specific tailoring for confidentiality.

What is the first step to begin implementing **NIST 800-171**?

**The first step is defining the system boundary and scoping components that process, store, transmit CUI, or provide protection.** Develop data flow maps and an initial SSP per 3.12.4, isolating a CUI security domain via firewalls and controls to limit scope.

FERPA vs NIST 800-171

Standards Comparison

FERPA

Mandatory

1974

U.S. regulation protecting privacy of student education records

NIST 800-171

Mandatory

2020

U.S. framework for protecting CUI in nonfederal systems

Quick Verdict

FERPA protects student education records privacy in schools via consent and access rights, while NIST 800-171 secures CUI in contractor systems through controls and assessments. Schools ensure compliance for funding; contractors meet contract mandates for eligibility.

Student Privacy

FERPA

Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Grants rights to inspect, amend, and consent to disclosures
Protects PII in education records with broad definitions
Allows exceptions for school officials and emergencies
Requires 45-day access response and annual notifications
Enforces compliance via federal funding withholding

Controlled Unclassified Information

NIST 800-171

NIST SP 800-171: Protecting CUI in Nonfederal Systems

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Tailored controls for CUI confidentiality in nonfederal systems
Scoped to CUI-processing components and protective enclave
SSP and POA&M for implementation and remediation tracking
17 families including supply chain risk management in r3
FedRAMP Moderate equivalence for cloud services

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

FERPA Details

What It Is

FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, 20 U.S.C. § 1232g; 34 CFR Part 99) is a U.S. federal regulation establishing privacy protections for student education records. It applies to institutions receiving federal education funds, granting rights to parents and eligible students for access, amendment, and control of personally identifiable information (PII) disclosures. Its risk-based approach balances privacy with educational needs via consent rules and exceptions.

Key Components

Core rights: inspect/review (45 days), amend inaccurate records, consent to disclosures.
Definitions: broad education records and PII (direct/indirect identifiers).
Exceptions (15+): school officials, emergencies, directory info.
Obligations: annual notices, disclosure logs, vendor controls. Compliance model enforced by Department of Education via complaints and funding penalties.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandated for federal funding eligibility; mitigates breach risks, lawsuits, reputational harm. Builds stakeholder trust, enables safe data sharing for operations/research. Strategic benefits include efficient governance, vendor management, innovation in edtech.

Implementation Overview

Phased: governance, data inventory, policies/training, technical controls (RBAC, logging), vendor DPAs, audits. Applies to K-12/postsecondary; no certification but ongoing FPCO enforcement. Cross-functional effort for all sizes.

NIST 800-171 Details

What It Is

NIST Special Publication (SP) 800-171 Revision 3 is a U.S. government security framework for protecting the confidentiality of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in nonfederal systems. Its primary scope targets federal contractors and supply chains, using a control-based approach tailored from NIST SP 800-53 Moderate baseline.

Key Components

17 families (expanded from 14 in r2) with ~97-110 requirements covering access control, audit, configuration, and new areas like supply chain risk management.
Built on FIPS 200 and SP 800-53; requires System Security Plan (SSP) and Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M).
Compliance via self-assessment or third-party audits using SP 800-171A procedures.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for DoD contracts via DFARS 252.204-7012; enables federal procurement eligibility.
Reduces CUI breach risks, builds supply chain trust, enhances cybersecurity maturity for CMMC Level 2.

Implementation Overview

Phased: scoping CUI enclave, gap analysis, control deployment, evidence collection.
Applies to contractors handling CUI; audits via C3PAO or DoD. Small firms: 6-12 months; enterprises: 12-24+ months. (178 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	FERPA	NIST 800-171
Scope	Student education records privacy	CUI confidentiality in nonfederal systems
Industry	Educational institutions (K-12, postsecondary)	Federal contractors, defense industrial base
Nature	Privacy regulation, funding-conditioned	Cybersecurity requirements, contract-mandated
Testing	Complaint-based investigations, self-compliance	SSP/POA&M assessments, CMMC audits
Penalties	Federal funding loss, complaints	Contract ineligibility, SPRS score impacts

Scope

FERPA

Student education records privacy

NIST 800-171

CUI confidentiality in nonfederal systems

Industry

FERPA

Educational institutions (K-12, postsecondary)

NIST 800-171

Federal contractors, defense industrial base

Nature

FERPA

Privacy regulation, funding-conditioned

NIST 800-171

Cybersecurity requirements, contract-mandated

Testing

FERPA

Complaint-based investigations, self-compliance

NIST 800-171

SSP/POA&M assessments, CMMC audits

Penalties

FERPA

Federal funding loss, complaints

NIST 800-171

Contract ineligibility, SPRS score impacts

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about FERPA and NIST 800-171

FERPA FAQ

NIST 800-171 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Singapore PDPA Implementation Guide: Mastering Part 6A Breach Notification Thresholds and Timelines from Primary Statute

Master Singapore PDPA Part 6A breach notifications: statutory thresholds (risk of significant harm), 72-hour timelines, checklists, templates & frameworks. Comp

How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)

Deploy CIS Controls v8.1 as a control backbone for NIS2 & DORA compliance. Step-by-step roadmap (IG1→IG2), deliverables, metrics & evidence model for hybrid/clo

What is DORA and which Requirements does the Standard define?

Discover DORA requirements for info security, strict authority monitoring, and steps to achieve compliance. Build a resilient organization with our detailed gui

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

POPIA vs SOX

Discover POPIA vs SOX: Compare South Africa's GDPR-aligned privacy law with US financial controls. Uncover key differences in data rights, security safeguards, and governance. Master compliance now.

LEED vs FedRAMP

Compare LEED vs FedRAMP: Green building rating vs federal cloud security. Uncover differences in requirements, costs, and ROI for executives driving sustainable, compliant projects. Choose wisely now.

LGPD vs ISO 13485

Compare LGPD vs ISO 13485: Crucial insights for medtech firms in Brazil. Align data privacy with quality management to dodge fines, boost compliance, and seize market opportunities. Explore now!

FERPA

NIST 800-171

Quick Verdict

FERPA

Key Features

NIST 800-171

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

FERPA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

NIST 800-171 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

FERPA FAQ

What is the primary objective of FERPA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with FERPA?

Does FERPA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for FERPA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with FERPA?

Can FERPA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing FERPA?

NIST 800-171 FAQ

What is the primary objective of NIST 800-171?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with NIST 800-171?

Does NIST 800-171 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for NIST 800-171 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with NIST 800-171?

Can NIST 800-171 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing NIST 800-171?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Singapore PDPA Implementation Guide: Mastering Part 6A Breach Notification Thresholds and Timelines from Primary Statute

How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)

What is DORA and which Requirements does the Standard define?

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

POPIA vs SOX

LEED vs FedRAMP

LGPD vs ISO 13485