FERPA
U.S. federal regulation protecting student education records privacy
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
U.S. SEC rules for cybersecurity incident and risk disclosures
Quick Verdict
FERPA protects student PII in education records for schools, mandating consent and access rights to safeguard privacy. U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules require public firms to disclose material cyber incidents within 4 days and detail governance, ensuring investor transparency on risks.
FERPA
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)
Key Features
- Grants inspection, amendment, and consent rights to education records
- Prohibits PII disclosure without prior written consent or exception
- Mandates 45-day response time for record access requests
- Requires annual notifications specifying disclosure criteria and procedures
- Imposes recordkeeping of all PII requests and disclosures
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and Incident Disclosure
Key Features
- Four-business-day disclosure of material cybersecurity incidents
- Annual risk management, strategy, and governance disclosures
- Inline XBRL tagging for machine-readable data
- Board oversight and management expertise requirements
- Third-party risk oversight processes
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
FERPA Details
What It Is
FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act), codified at 20 U.S.C. § 1232g and implemented via 34 CFR Part 99, is a U.S. federal regulation establishing privacy protections for student education records. Its primary purpose is safeguarding personally identifiable information (PII) in records maintained by educational institutions receiving federal funds. FERPA employs a rights-based approach with strict consent rules, enumerated exceptions, and operational timelines like 45-day access.
Key Components
- Core rights: inspect/review records, amend inaccurate/misleading entries, consent to disclosures.
- PII definition: direct/indirect identifiers linkable to students.
- Disclosure governance: general consent prohibition plus 15+ exceptions (e.g., school officials, emergencies).
- Compliance model: annual notices, disclosure logs, hearings; enforced by Department of Education via complaints and funding leverage.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for federal fund recipients to avoid penalties like fund withholding.
- Mitigates legal/reputational risks from breaches.
- Builds stakeholder trust; enables safe data sharing.
- Supports operations like vendor management and analytics.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: governance, data inventory, policies/training, technical controls (RBAC, logging), vendor contracts. Applies to K-12/postsecondary institutions; no formal certification but requires auditable processes and annual notifications. (178 words)
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules Details
What It Is
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules (Release No. 33-11216), adopted in 2023, is a federal regulation mandating standardized disclosures for public companies under the Securities Exchange Act. It focuses on timely reporting of material cybersecurity incidents and annual descriptions of risk management, strategy, and governance. The approach is materiality-based, aligning with securities law principles without bright-line thresholds.
Key Components
- **Incident disclosureForm 8-K Item 1.05 requires reporting material incidents within four business days.
- **Annual disclosuresRegulation S-K Item 106 covers processes, board oversight, and management roles in Forms 10-K/20-F.
- **Structured dataInline XBRL tagging for comparability.
- No fixed controls; emphasizes processes over technical specifics.
Why Organizations Use It
Public companies comply to meet legal obligations, protect investors, enhance market efficiency, and reduce enforcement risks like fines or litigation. It integrates cyber risk into enterprise governance, builds stakeholder trust, and supports capital allocation decisions amid rising threats.
Implementation Overview
Phased rollout: incident reporting from Dec 2023 (SRCs June 2024); annual from FYE Dec 2023. Involves cross-functional playbooks, materiality frameworks, board reporting, and Inline XBRL prep. Applies to all Exchange Act registrants; no certification but SEC enforcement via disclosure controls.
Key Differences
| Aspect | FERPA | U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Student education records privacy and PII | Public company cyber incidents and governance |
| Industry | Educational institutions receiving federal funds | Public companies and SEC registrants |
| Nature | Mandatory privacy regulation with funding enforcement | Mandatory securities disclosure rules |
| Testing | Access controls and recordkeeping audits | Materiality assessments and disclosure controls |
| Penalties | Federal funding withholding and complaints | SEC enforcement fines and injunctions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about FERPA and U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
FERPA FAQ
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Human-AI Synergy: How Modern Compliance Tools Amplify Your Team's Strategic Impact
Unlock human-AI synergy with modern compliance tools. Automate monitoring, cut non-compliance risks 3x, and boost strategic decision-making. Elevate your team's

HITRUST CSF MyCSF Platform Mastery: Infograph of Evidence Tagging Workflows and Top 5 Maturity Tier Acceleration Takeaways
Master MyCSF platform with infographics on evidence tagging for 1,400+ HITRUST controls across 19 domains. Cut documentation by 30%, boost Measured/Managed tier

CMMC Scoping Mastery for Defense Supply Chains: Enclave Mapping, Subcontractor Flow-Down, and CUI Inventory Blueprint
Master CMMC scoping for DIB: delineate FCI/CUI boundaries, segment enclaves, manage subcontractor flow-down. Prevent 80% assessment failures with SSP templates,
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 31000 vs Basel III
Compare ISO 31000 vs Basel III: Enterprise risk guidelines meet banking capital, leverage & liquidity standards. Boost compliance, resilience & strategy now!
CMMC vs ISO 13485
CMMC vs ISO 13485: DoD cybersecurity tiers (NIST 800-171/172) for FCI/CUI vs med device QMS (risk mgmt, validation). Key diffs, compliance & strategies. Compare now!
ISO 27032 vs NIST 800-53
Compare ISO 27032 vs NIST 800-53: Ecosystem cybersecurity guidelines meet 1,100+ controls catalog. Discover differences, synergies, baselines & strategies for resilient security. (152 characters)