FISMA
U.S. federal law for risk-based cybersecurity management
23 NYCRR 500
NY regulation for financial services cybersecurity compliance
Quick Verdict
FISMA mandates NIST RMF for federal agencies and contractors nationwide, ensuring continuous risk management. 23 NYCRR 500 enforces prescriptive cybersecurity for NY financial firms with fines. Organizations adopt FISMA for federal work, Part 500 for state compliance and resilience.
FISMA
Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA)
Key Features
- Mandates NIST RMF 7-step risk management process
- Requires continuous monitoring and ongoing authorization
- Enforces FIPS 199 system impact categorization
- Implements NIST SP 800-53 security control baselines
- Demands annual IG independent program assessments
23 NYCRR 500
23 NYCRR Part 500 Cybersecurity Regulation
Key Features
- CEO/CISO annual dual-signature certification
- 72-hour cybersecurity incident notification
- Phishing-resistant MFA for privileged access
- Risk-based TPSP security policy and contracts
- Annual penetration testing and vulnerability management
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
FISMA Details
What It Is
Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) is a U.S. federal law establishing a risk-based framework for protecting federal information and systems. Enacted in 2002 and modernized in 2014, it mandates agency-wide information security programs using the NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF) to ensure confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Key Components
- NIST RMF 7 steps: Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor.
- FIPS 199 categorization and NIST SP 800-53 controls (20 families, baselines by impact level).
- Continuous monitoring via SP 800-137, annual IG assessments, and CISA/OMB metrics.
- Compliance model emphasizes evidence-based ongoing authorization, not periodic certification.
Why Organizations Use It
FISMA drives mandatory compliance for federal agencies and contractors, reducing breach risks, enabling market access, and building stakeholder trust. It aligns cybersecurity with mission outcomes, offering efficiency through automation and competitive edge in federal procurement.
Implementation Overview
Follow RMF phases with governance setup, inventory, control deployment, assessments, and sustainment. Applies to federal executive agencies, contractors, cloud providers; scalable for large enterprises to smaller vendors via FedRAMP. Requires annual reporting and IG audits.
23 NYCRR 500 Details
What It Is
23 NYCRR Part 500, the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) Cybersecurity Regulation, is a state regulation establishing minimum cybersecurity standards for financial services entities. Its primary purpose is safeguarding nonpublic information (NPI) and ensuring operational integrity against cyber threats. It employs a risk-based approach with prescriptive elements, evolved through 2023 amendments emphasizing evidence-based compliance.
Key Components
- **14 core requirementsCybersecurity program, policy, CISO governance, access privileges, MFA, encryption, risk assessments, TPSP oversight, penetration testing, incident response, annual certification.
- Pillars include governance accountability, technical controls, vendor management, testing, and 72-hour reporting.
- Built on NIST CSF-aligned methodologies; requires CEO/CISO dual-signature annual certification with 5-year record retention.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for NY-licensed financial entities to avoid multimillion-dollar fines (e.g., Robinhood $30M).
- Drives cyber resilience, robust TPRM, incident readiness.
- Enhances stakeholder trust, reduces enforcement risk, aligns with enterprise risk management.
Implementation Overview
- Phased roadmap: gap analysis, risk assessment, control deployment (MFA, asset inventory), evidence repository.
- Targets NY-chartered banks, insurers; Class A companies face enhanced audits.
- No formal certification but NYDFS examinations enforce compliance. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | FISMA | 23 NYCRR 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Federal info systems security via NIST RMF | Financial entities' cybersecurity programs |
| Industry | US federal agencies, contractors nationwide | NY financial services licensees only |
| Nature | Mandatory federal law with oversight | Mandatory state regulation enforced by NYDFS |
| Testing | Continuous monitoring, annual IG assessments | Annual pen tests, bi-annual vuln scans |
| Penalties | Loss of funding, contracts, IG directives | Fines, consent orders, license actions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about FISMA and 23 NYCRR 500
FISMA FAQ
23 NYCRR 500 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365
Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence

Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software
Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for

Top 10 Reasons CMMC Level 3 Certification Unlocks Competitive Edge for Primes Handling Critical DoD Programs
Discover top 10 reasons CMMC Level 3 certification unlocks competitive edge for DoD primes. Reduced APT risks, procurement prefs, NIST 800-172 compliance via v2
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
AEO vs IEC 62443
Compare AEO vs IEC 62443: Customs trade security for faster clearance vs OT cybersecurity standards for resilient IACS. Discover differences, benefits & strategies to optimize compliance now.
IEC 62443 vs GDPR UK
Discover IEC 62443 vs UK GDPR: Compare OT cybersecurity standards with data protection laws. Align zones, SLs & principles for industrial compliance. Expert guide!
PRINCE2 vs ISA 95
PRINCE2 vs ISA 95: Project governance meets manufacturing integration. Compare PRINCE2's 7 principles, practices & processes with ISA-95's levels & models. Boost IT/OT efficiency now!