What is the primary objective of **FISMA**?

**FISMA mandates federal agencies to develop, document, implement, and maintain risk-based information security programs protecting the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of federal information and systems.** Enacted in 2002 and modernized in 2014, it requires agency-wide programs using NIST's Risk Management Framework (RMF) with seven steps: Prepare, Categorize (per FIPS 199), Select (NIST SP 800-53), Implement, Assess, Authorize, and Monitor. Oversight involves OMB for policy, DHS/CISA for operations, and IGs for annual evaluations.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **FISMA**?

**FISMA applies to all federal executive branch civilian agencies and extends to contractors, vendors, and service providers operating or processing federal information systems.** This includes cloud providers via FedRAMP, state/local entities administering federal programs (e.g., Medicaid), and system integrators handling federal data. Agency heads, CIOs, CISOs, and Authorizing Officials bear primary responsibility; contractors must align via contracts to support agency Authorizations to Operate (ATOs).

Does **FISMA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**FISMA requires annual independent evaluations by agency Inspectors General (IGs), who may use third-party assessors, but does not mandate external certification.** IGs assess program maturity using CISA metrics across NIST Cybersecurity Framework functions, rating from Level 1 (Ad Hoc) to Level 5 (Optimized). Contractors face agency-driven assessments; FedRAMP provides standardized third-party assessments for cloud services supporting FISMA compliance.

How often should an assessment for **FISMA** be performed?

**FISMA requires annual IG independent evaluations of agency security programs, supplemented by continuous monitoring per NIST SP 800-137.** RMF assessments occur during the Assess step and ongoing via tiered Information Security Continuous Monitoring (ISCM), with metrics on vulnerabilities, patching, and incidents reported via dashboards. Major incidents trigger real-time reporting to CISA and Congress within defined timelines (e.g., 30 days for significant PII breaches).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **FISMA**?

**FISMA non-compliance results in unfavorable IG reports, OMB remediation directives, reduced funding, contract loss, and debarment for contractors.** Agencies face operational constraints, mission degradation, and public scrutiny via OMB's annual report to Congress. Contractors risk termination, adverse past performance, and enforcement under DFARS; persistent failures lead to heightened CISA oversight and GAO critiques.

Can **FISMA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**FISMA does not officially map to other frameworks, as it is a U.S. federal law mandating NIST RMF and SP 800-53 for civilian agencies.** Its risk-based controls align conceptually with voluntary standards, enabling reciprocity in multi-framework environments, but agencies must prioritize NIST baselines without formal crosswalks.

What is the first step to begin implementing **FISMA**?

**The first step in FISMA implementation is the RMF Prepare phase: establish governance, assign roles (e.g., CIO, CISO, Authorizing Official), and create a system inventory.** Develop a risk management strategy, classify systems per FIPS 199, and document in a security governance charter, ensuring executive sponsorship for RMF lifecycle execution.

What is the primary objective of **Australian Privacy Act**?

**The primary objective of the Australian Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) is to regulate the handling of personal information by Australian Government agencies and eligible private sector organisations to promote and protect individual privacy while facilitating transborder information flows.** This is achieved through the **13 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)**, which govern collection, use, disclosure, security (**APP 11**), and individual rights across the information lifecycle. The **Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) scheme** (Part IIIC, from 22 February 2018) enforces transparency for breaches likely to cause **serious harm**.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **Australian Privacy Act**?

**The Australian Privacy Act applies to all Australian Government agencies and private sector organisations with annual turnover exceeding AU$3 million, plus specific small business operators (SBOs) in defined circumstances.** Coverage extends to SBOs providing **health services**, **trading in personal information**, holding **Consumer Data Right** accreditation, offering **Digital ID Act 2024** services, handling **TFNs**, or opting in under s 6EA. Foreign entities with an **Australian link**—carrying on business in Australia and handling Australians’ personal information—are also bound.

Does **Australian Privacy Act** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, the Australian Privacy Act does not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** The **OAIC** conducts commissioner-initiated **privacy assessments** (audits) and investigations, but entities must demonstrate **reasonable steps** under the APPs (e.g., **APP 11** security) through internal governance, policies (**APP 1**), and evidence like PIAs. Voluntary frameworks such as ISO 27701 support compliance but are not required.

How often should an assessment for **Australian Privacy Act** be performed?

**Assessments for Australian Privacy Act compliance should be performed regularly as part of ongoing risk management, with no fixed statutory frequency.** Entities must maintain up-to-date **privacy policies** (**APP 1**) and take **reasonable steps** continuously, scaling with context (e.g., data sensitivity, threats). **OAIC** recommends periodic **Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs)** for high-risk activities, post-incident reviews, and annual internal audits to ensure APP adherence and NDB readiness.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **Australian Privacy Act**?

**Non-compliance with the Australian Privacy Act can result in civil penalties up to AU$50 million or 30% of adjusted annual turnover for serious or repeated interferences with privacy (s 13G).** The **OAIC** may issue determinations, enforceable undertakings, infringement notices, or seek Federal Court penalties. The NDB scheme mandates notifications for eligible breaches; failures (e.g., delayed assessments under s 26WH) attract fines, as in *Australian Information Commissioner v Australian Clinical Labs Ltd* ($5.8M penalty). Reputational damage and remediation orders follow.

Can **Australian Privacy Act** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, the Australian Privacy Act can be mapped to other international frameworks through principles-based alignments, though no formal equivalence exists.** **APP 8** (cross-border) accountability under s 16C parallels GDPR transfer mechanisms; **APP 11** security aligns with ISO 27001/27701 controls. **OAIC** guidance supports interoperability for transborder flows, with exceptions for substantially similar laws (**APP 8.2(a)**), but entities must document mappings for compliance.

What is the first step to begin implementing **Australian Privacy Act**?

**The first step to implement the Australian Privacy Act is to conduct a scope and data mapping assessment to determine APP entity status and identify personal information holdings.** Evaluate turnover (AU$3M threshold), SBO exceptions (e.g., health, TFN), and flows (cross-border under **APP 8**). Develop an **APP 1** privacy policy and baseline **APP 11** security program, per **OAIC** guidance.

FISMA vs Australian Privacy Act

Standards Comparison

FISMA

Mandatory

2014

U.S. law mandating risk-based federal cybersecurity

Australian Privacy Act

Mandatory

1988

Australian regulation for personal information privacy protection

Quick Verdict

FISMA mandates risk-based cybersecurity for US federal systems and contractors via NIST RMF, while Australian Privacy Act enforces principles for personal data handling by Australian entities with strict breach notifications. Organizations adopt FISMA for federal contracts, Privacy Act for legal compliance Down Under.

Cybersecurity

FISMA

Federal Information Security Modernization Act 2014

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Mandates NIST RMF 7-step risk lifecycle
Requires continuous monitoring and diagnostics
Enforces annual independent IG assessments
Demands real-time major incident reporting
Applies to agencies and contractors alike

Data Privacy

Australian Privacy Act

Privacy Act 1988 (Cth)

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

13 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)
Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) scheme
Cross-border disclosure accountability (APP 8)
Security of personal information (APP 11)
OAIC enforcement and civil penalties

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

FISMA Details

What It Is

Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) of 2014 is a U.S. federal law establishing a risk-based framework for protecting federal information and systems. It modernizes the 2002 act, emphasizing continuous monitoring over static compliance, using NIST RMF (7 steps: Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor) to ensure confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Key Components

NIST SP 800-53 controls (20 families, baselines per FIPS 199 impact levels)
Agency-wide security programs with SSPs, POA&Ms
Oversight by OMB, DHS/CISA, IGs via metrics and maturity models
No formal certification; compliance via annual reporting and assessments

Why Organizations Use It

Mandated for federal agencies and contractors handling federal data; reduces breach risks, enables market access (e.g., FedRAMP), builds resilience and trust. Strategic benefits include operational efficiency and competitive edge in federal procurement.

Implementation Overview

Phased RMF approach: inventory, categorize, implement controls, continuous monitoring. Applies to agencies, contractors; high complexity for large/federated orgs; involves audits, automation tools like CDM.

Australian Privacy Act Details

What It Is

The Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) is Australia's foundational federal privacy regulation for handling personal information by government agencies and private organizations. It adopts a principles-based, risk-calibrated approach via the 13 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs), covering the full data lifecycle from collection to destruction.

Key Components

**13 APPsCore rules on transparency (APP 1), collection/use/disclosure (APPs 3-8), quality/security (APPs 10-11), and access/correction (APPs 12-13).
**Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) schemeMandatory notification for serious-harm breaches.
**OAIC oversightGuidance, audits, investigations, penalties up to AUD 50M. No certification; compliance via demonstrable governance and controls.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for entities >AU$3M turnover, health providers, etc.
Mitigates legal risks, penalties, reputational harm.
Enhances trust, enables secure cross-border flows.
Drives risk management, privacy-by-design for innovation.

Implementation Overview

Phased: discovery/gap analysis, policy/controls design, deployment/training, monitoring. Applies economy-wide with Australian link; OAIC assessments verify compliance. (~178 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	FISMA	Australian Privacy Act
Scope	Federal info systems security (CIA triad)	Personal info handling (collection, use, disclosure)
Industry	US federal agencies, contractors	Australian agencies, businesses >$3M turnover
Nature	Mandatory US law, risk-based framework	Mandatory principles-based regulation
Testing	Continuous monitoring, IG assessments	OAIC audits, incident assessments
Penalties	Contract loss, debarment, directives	Fines up to $50M or 30% turnover

Scope

FISMA

Federal info systems security (CIA triad)

Australian Privacy Act

Personal info handling (collection, use, disclosure)

Industry

FISMA

US federal agencies, contractors

Australian Privacy Act

Australian agencies, businesses >$3M turnover

Nature

FISMA

Mandatory US law, risk-based framework

Australian Privacy Act

Mandatory principles-based regulation

Testing

FISMA

Continuous monitoring, IG assessments

Australian Privacy Act

OAIC audits, incident assessments

Penalties

FISMA

Contract loss, debarment, directives

Australian Privacy Act

Fines up to $50M or 30% turnover

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about FISMA and Australian Privacy Act

FISMA FAQ

Australian Privacy Act FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CIS Controls v8.1 Metrics That Matter: KPIs, KRIs, and Dashboards for Board-Ready Cyber Reporting

Quantify CIS Controls v8.1 success with KPIs, KRIs & dashboards. Learn what to measure, calculations, and executive presentations linking security to business r

From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day

Discover how compliance software automates monitoring, delivers real-time insights, and transforms compliance pros from reactive gatekeepers to proactive strate

Measuring CIS Controls v8.1 in the Real World: KPIs, Dashboards, and Automated Evidence for Continuous Assurance

Master CIS Controls v8.1 measurement with essential KPIs, executive-ready dashboards, and automated evidence collection for continuous assurance. Make complianc

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 9001 vs AEO

Explore ISO 9001 vs AEO: Compare quality management certification & Authorized Economic Operator status. Key differences, benefits, requirements & implementation tips for global success.

APRA CPS 234 vs CIS Controls

Discover APRA CPS 234 vs CIS Controls: Align Australia's prudential info security standard with global cyber best practices for financial resilience. Map gaps & optimize compliance now!

DORA vs ISO 26000

Compare DORA vs ISO 26000: EU finance resilience regulation meets global SR guidance. Key diffs, compliance strategies & synergies for risk mgmt. Boost ops now!

FISMA

Australian Privacy Act

Quick Verdict

FISMA

Key Features

Australian Privacy Act

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

FISMA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Australian Privacy Act Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

FISMA FAQ

What is the primary objective of FISMA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with FISMA?

Does FISMA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for FISMA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with FISMA?

Can FISMA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing FISMA?

Australian Privacy Act FAQ

What is the primary objective of Australian Privacy Act?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with Australian Privacy Act?

Does Australian Privacy Act require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for Australian Privacy Act be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with Australian Privacy Act?

Can Australian Privacy Act be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing Australian Privacy Act?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CIS Controls v8.1 Metrics That Matter: KPIs, KRIs, and Dashboards for Board-Ready Cyber Reporting

From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day

Measuring CIS Controls v8.1 in the Real World: KPIs, Dashboards, and Automated Evidence for Continuous Assurance

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 9001 vs AEO

APRA CPS 234 vs CIS Controls

DORA vs ISO 26000