FISMA
U.S. federal law mandating risk-based cybersecurity programs
EN 1090
EU standard for steel and aluminium structural execution.
Quick Verdict
FISMA mandates risk-based cybersecurity for US federal systems via NIST RMF, ensuring compliance and resilience. EN 1090 requires CE-marked structural steel/aluminium via FPC, guaranteeing execution quality. Agencies/contractors adopt FISMA for mandates; fabricators use EN 1090 for EU market access.
FISMA
Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014
Key Features
- Mandates NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF)
- Requires continuous monitoring and diagnostics
- Enforces risk-based system categorization (FIPS 199)
- Applies to agencies, contractors, and supply chains
- Demands annual IG assessments and OMB reporting
EN 1090
EN 1090 Execution of steel and aluminium structures
Key Features
- Risk-based Execution Classes EXC1-4
- Factory Production Control FPC certification
- CE marking via Notified Body audits
- Welding quality management ISO 3834
- Material traceability and NDT inspection
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
FISMA Details
What It Is
Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) of 2014 is a U.S. federal law establishing a risk-based framework for protecting federal information and systems. It modernizes the 2002 act, emphasizing continuous monitoring, incident reporting, and NIST standards for civilian executive branch agencies and contractors.
Key Components
- NIST RMF 7-step process: Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor.
- NIST SP 800-53 controls tailored by FIPS 199 impact levels.
- Annual metrics, IG evaluations, OMB/DHS/CISA oversight.
- Compliance via SSPs, POA&Ms, ATOs; no formal certification but independent audits.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for federal agencies/contractors handling federal data; reduces breach risks, enables market access, builds resilience. Strategic benefits include operational efficiency and competitive edge in federal procurement.
Implementation Overview
Phased RMF approach: governance/inventory, categorization/control selection, implementation/assessment, continuous monitoring. Applies to all federal sizes/industries; requires automation, training, supply chain oversight. Involves IG annual assessments.
EN 1090 Details
What It Is
EN 1090 is a harmonized European standard family for the execution of steel and aluminium structures. It provides technical requirements and conformity assessment under the EU Construction Products Regulation (CPR), enabling CE marking. Its risk-based approach uses Execution Classes (EXC1–EXC4) to scale requirements based on failure consequences, service conditions, and production complexity.
Key Components
- **EN 1090-1Conformity assessment, Factory Production Control (FPC), Declaration of Performance (DoP).
- **EN 1090-2/-3Technical rules for steel/aluminium (materials, welding, tolerances, corrosion protection, inspection/NDT).
- Core principles: traceability, qualified welding (ISO 3834), risk-scaled controls.
- Certification model: Notified Body audits FPC with ongoing surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for CE marking and EU market access for structural components.
- Reduces liability, ensures quality, enables high-risk projects.
- Builds trust, differentiates in tenders, lowers rework via disciplined processes.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, FPC development, personnel training, NB certification (3-12 months).
- Applies to fabricators in construction; requires welding coordinators, digital traceability.
- Involves audits, ITT/ITC, surveillance for manufacturers of load-bearing kits/components.
Key Differences
| Aspect | FISMA | EN 1090 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Federal information security and systems | Structural steel/aluminium components execution |
| Industry | US federal agencies, contractors, cloud providers | EU construction, steel/aluminium fabricators |
| Nature | US federal law, mandatory for agencies | EU harmonized standard, mandatory CE marking |
| Testing | Continuous monitoring, RMF assessments, IG audits | FPC certification, NB audits, surveillance |
| Penalties | Contract loss, debarment, IG reports | Market exclusion, fines, certificate suspension |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about FISMA and EN 1090
FISMA FAQ
EN 1090 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Top 5 Reasons HITRUST CSF's MyCSF Platform Crushes Evidence Overload for R2 Assessments in Hybrid Cloud Environments
Explore top 5 advantages of HITRUST MyCSF for 1,400+ R2 controls in hybrid clouds. Slash docs by 30%, dodge under-scoping, achieve continuous compliance for hea
Top 10 Reasons ISO 27701 is the Ultimate Privacy Boost for Your ISO 27001 ISMS in 2025
Extend ISO 27001 with ISO 27701 for ultimate privacy governance amid GDPR & AI regs. Discover top 10 advantages like integrated audits to future-proof your ISMS
CIS Controls v8.1 Metrics That Matter: KPIs, KRIs, and Dashboards for Board-Ready Cyber Reporting
Quantify CIS Controls v8.1 success with KPIs, KRIs & dashboards. Learn what to measure, calculations, and executive presentations linking security to business r
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
IEC 62443 vs ISO 22000
Compare IEC 62443 vs ISO 22000: OT cybersecurity powerhouse meets food safety FSMS. Unpack risks, zones/SLs vs PRPs/HACCP, and implementation for resilient ops. Optimize now!
GMP vs COBIT
Discover GMP vs COBIT: Compare pharma manufacturing standards with IT governance frameworks. Boost compliance, risk management & strategy for regulated industries now!
GDPR vs ISO 41001
Discover GDPR vs ISO 41001: Contrast EU data privacy law with facility management standard. Key compliance differences, risks & integration tips. Boost security now! (152)