Standards Comparison

    FISMA

    Mandatory
    2014

    U.S. federal law mandating risk-based cybersecurity programs

    VS

    FedRAMP

    Mandatory
    2011

    U.S. framework standardizing federal cloud security authorization

    Quick Verdict

    FISMA mandates risk-based security for federal agencies and contractors via NIST RMF, while FedRAMP standardizes cloud authorizations with reusable assessments. Agencies comply for FISMA obligations; CSPs pursue FedRAMP to access federal cloud markets.

    Cybersecurity

    FISMA

    Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates NIST RMF 7-step risk management process
    • Requires continuous monitoring and diagnostics program
    • Categorizes systems by FIPS 199 impact levels
    • Demands annual independent IG assessments and reporting
    • Applies to federal agencies and contractors alike
    Cloud Security

    FedRAMP

    Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • NIST 800-53 Rev 5 controls at Low/Moderate/High baselines
    • Independent 3PAO security assessments required
    • Continuous monitoring with monthly/annual deliverables
    • "Assess once, use many times" reusability model
    • FedRAMP Marketplace listing for authorized CSPs

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    FISMA Details

    What It Is

    Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) of 2014 is a U.S. federal law establishing a risk-based framework for protecting federal information and systems. It modernizes the 2002 act, emphasizing continuous monitoring, incident reporting, and NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF) for agency-wide security programs protecting confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

    Key Components

    • NIST RMF 7 steps: Prepare, Categorize (FIPS 199), Select/Implement/Assess (SP 800-53), Authorize, Monitor.
    • Controls from NIST SP 800-53 (20 families), baselines in SP 800-53B.
    • Core elements: System Security Plans (SSPs), Plans of Action and Milestones (POA&Ms), Authorizations to Operate (ATOs).
    • Oversight via OMB, DHS/CISA, Inspectors General with maturity metrics aligned to NIST Cybersecurity Framework.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Federal agencies and contractors must comply to avoid penalties, loss of funding, debarment. Provides risk reduction, resilience, market access (e.g., FedRAMP), operational efficiency, and executive risk decisions.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased RMF approach: governance/inventory, categorize/select controls, implement/assess/authorize, continuous monitoring. Applies to executive branch agencies, contractors; requires annual IG audits, no central certification but ATOs per system. Scalable for large agencies/small contractors.

    FedRAMP Details

    What It Is

    FedRAMP (Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program) is a U.S. government-wide framework standardizing security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud services used by federal agencies. Its primary purpose is enabling "assess once, use many times" to reduce duplication, based on a risk-based approach using NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls mapped to FIPS 199 impact levels (Low, Moderate, High).

    Key Components

    • **Baselines~156 (Low), ~323 (Moderate), ~410 (High) controls, plus LI-SaaS tailored baseline.
    • Core artifacts: System Security Plan (SSP), Security Assessment Report (SAR), Plan of Actions & Milestones (POA&M).
    • Built on NIST standards; requires independent 3PAO assessments.
    • Compliance model: Authorization paths via Agency or Program ATOs, with ongoing continuous monitoring.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Unlocks federal contracts (e.g., $20M+ opportunities) and CMMC compliance.
    • Demonstrates robust security for commercial clients.
    • Reduces risk via standardized controls and reusability.
    • Builds stakeholder trust through Marketplace visibility.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased process: Preparation, assessment, authorization, monitoring (12-18 months typical).
    • Key activities: Gap analysis, SSP development, 3PAO audits.
    • Applies to CSPs targeting U.S. federal market; high complexity for all sizes.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    FISMA
    Federal agency-wide info security programs
    FedRAMP
    Cloud service security assessments

    Industry

    FISMA
    Federal agencies, contractors
    FedRAMP
    Cloud service providers to feds

    Nature

    FISMA
    Mandatory federal law
    FedRAMP
    Standardized authorization program

    Testing

    FISMA
    Annual IG assessments, continuous monitoring
    FedRAMP
    3PAO assessments, annual reassessments

    Penalties

    FISMA
    IG reports, contract loss, funding cuts
    FedRAMP
    Marketplace delisting, contract ineligibility

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about FISMA and FedRAMP

    FISMA FAQ

    FedRAMP FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages