FISMA
U.S. federal law mandating risk-based cybersecurity programs
FedRAMP
U.S. framework standardizing federal cloud security authorization
Quick Verdict
FISMA mandates risk-based security for federal agencies and contractors via NIST RMF, while FedRAMP standardizes cloud authorizations with reusable assessments. Agencies comply for FISMA obligations; CSPs pursue FedRAMP to access federal cloud markets.
FISMA
Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014
Key Features
- Mandates NIST RMF 7-step risk management process
- Requires continuous monitoring and diagnostics program
- Categorizes systems by FIPS 199 impact levels
- Demands annual independent IG assessments and reporting
- Applies to federal agencies and contractors alike
FedRAMP
Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program
Key Features
- NIST 800-53 Rev 5 controls at Low/Moderate/High baselines
- Independent 3PAO security assessments required
- Continuous monitoring with monthly/annual deliverables
- "Assess once, use many times" reusability model
- FedRAMP Marketplace listing for authorized CSPs
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
FISMA Details
What It Is
Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) of 2014 is a U.S. federal law establishing a risk-based framework for protecting federal information and systems. It modernizes the 2002 act, emphasizing continuous monitoring, incident reporting, and NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF) for agency-wide security programs protecting confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Key Components
- NIST RMF 7 steps: Prepare, Categorize (FIPS 199), Select/Implement/Assess (SP 800-53), Authorize, Monitor.
- Controls from NIST SP 800-53 (20 families), baselines in SP 800-53B.
- Core elements: System Security Plans (SSPs), Plans of Action and Milestones (POA&Ms), Authorizations to Operate (ATOs).
- Oversight via OMB, DHS/CISA, Inspectors General with maturity metrics aligned to NIST Cybersecurity Framework.
Why Organizations Use It
Federal agencies and contractors must comply to avoid penalties, loss of funding, debarment. Provides risk reduction, resilience, market access (e.g., FedRAMP), operational efficiency, and executive risk decisions.
Implementation Overview
Phased RMF approach: governance/inventory, categorize/select controls, implement/assess/authorize, continuous monitoring. Applies to executive branch agencies, contractors; requires annual IG audits, no central certification but ATOs per system. Scalable for large agencies/small contractors.
FedRAMP Details
What It Is
FedRAMP (Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program) is a U.S. government-wide framework standardizing security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud services used by federal agencies. Its primary purpose is enabling "assess once, use many times" to reduce duplication, based on a risk-based approach using NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls mapped to FIPS 199 impact levels (Low, Moderate, High).
Key Components
- **Baselines~156 (Low), ~323 (Moderate), ~410 (High) controls, plus LI-SaaS tailored baseline.
- Core artifacts: System Security Plan (SSP), Security Assessment Report (SAR), Plan of Actions & Milestones (POA&M).
- Built on NIST standards; requires independent 3PAO assessments.
- Compliance model: Authorization paths via Agency or Program ATOs, with ongoing continuous monitoring.
Why Organizations Use It
- Unlocks federal contracts (e.g., $20M+ opportunities) and CMMC compliance.
- Demonstrates robust security for commercial clients.
- Reduces risk via standardized controls and reusability.
- Builds stakeholder trust through Marketplace visibility.
Implementation Overview
- Phased process: Preparation, assessment, authorization, monitoring (12-18 months typical).
- Key activities: Gap analysis, SSP development, 3PAO audits.
- Applies to CSPs targeting U.S. federal market; high complexity for all sizes.
Key Differences
| Aspect | FISMA | FedRAMP |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Federal agency-wide info security programs | Cloud service security assessments |
| Industry | Federal agencies, contractors | Cloud service providers to feds |
| Nature | Mandatory federal law | Standardized authorization program |
| Testing | Annual IG assessments, continuous monitoring | 3PAO assessments, annual reassessments |
| Penalties | IG reports, contract loss, funding cuts | Marketplace delisting, contract ineligibility |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about FISMA and FedRAMP
FISMA FAQ
FedRAMP FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Why the SEC Stepped In: The Investor-Driven Push for Cybersecurity Transparency
Discover why the SEC's 2023 cybersecurity rules treat cyber risks as material financial threats. Explore the 'stick and carrot' approach for standardized disclo

Top 10 Reasons CMMC Level 3 Certification Unlocks Competitive Edge for Primes Handling Critical DoD Programs
Discover top 10 reasons CMMC Level 3 certification unlocks competitive edge for DoD primes. Reduced APT risks, procurement prefs, NIST 800-172 compliance via v2

Top 5 Unseen Complexities Modern Compliance Software Effortlessly Manages
Uncover top 5 unseen complexities modern compliance software manages effortlessly—from sensitive data mapping to real-time regulatory shifts. Automate audits, i
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
DORA vs 23 NYCRR 500
Compare DORA vs 23 NYCRR 500: Decode EU & NY financial resilience regs. Key diffs in governance, ICT risk, testing, reporting & third-party oversight. Master compliance now.
ISO 14001 vs POPIA
ISO 14001 vs POPIA: Compare EMS standards for environmental excellence with SA's data privacy law. Discover synergies, compliance strategies & implementation tips for success.
HIPAA vs CIS Controls
Compare HIPAA vs CIS Controls: Align privacy rules, ePHI safeguards & cyber hygiene for healthcare resilience. Uncover gaps, boost compliance—secure your strategy today.