FISMA
U.S. federal law for risk-based cybersecurity management
IFS Food
GFSI-benchmarked standard for food safety and quality manufacturing
Quick Verdict
FISMA mandates risk-based cybersecurity for US federal agencies and contractors via NIST RMF, ensuring data protection. IFS Food certifies food manufacturers' processes for safety and quality through GFSI audits. Organizations adopt FISMA for compliance, IFS Food for global retail access.
FISMA
Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014
Key Features
- Mandates NIST RMF 7-step risk management lifecycle
- Requires continuous monitoring and ongoing authorization
- Applies to federal agencies and contractors handling federal data
- Enforces FIPS 199 impact-based system categorization
- Features OMB/DHS/IG oversight with annual reporting
IFS Food
IFS Food Version 8
Key Features
- Product and Process Approach with traceability tests
- Minimum 50% on-site audit evaluation time
- Risk-based HACCP, fraud, and defense controls
- 10 Knock-Out requirements for certification
- Annual audits with unannounced Star status option
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
FISMA Details
What It Is
Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) of 2014 is a U.S. federal law establishing a risk-based framework for protecting federal information and systems. It mandates agency-wide information security programs using NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF), focusing on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Key Components
- **7-step RMFPrepare, Categorize (FIPS 199), Select/Implement/Assess (NIST SP 800-53), Authorize, Monitor.
- 20 control families in SP 800-53 with baselines for low/moderate/high impact.
- Continuous monitoring via SP 800-137; annual IG evaluations and OMB reporting.
- No formal certification; compliance via ATO and metrics.
Why Organizations Use It
Federal agencies and contractors must comply to avoid penalties, debarment, and funding loss. It reduces breach risks, enables market access (e.g., FedRAMP), boosts resilience, and aligns cybersecurity with missions for executive risk decisions.
Implementation Overview
Phased RMF approach: inventory, categorize, implement controls, assess/authorize, monitor continuously. Applies to agencies, contractors, cloud providers; scales by size via automation. Involves SSP, POA&M, audits; 12-24 months typical.
IFS Food Details
What It Is
IFS Food Version 8 is a GFSI-benchmarked certification standard for auditing product and process compliance in food manufacturing. It ensures safe, legal, authentic products meeting customer specifications via a risk-based Product and Process Approach (PPA) with on-site verification.
Key Components
- Organized into governance, HACCP/PRPs, operational controls (e.g., allergens, fraud, defense), and performance monitoring.
- Over 200 checklist requirements with 10 Knock-Out (KO) criteria.
- Built on HACCP, PRPs, and integrity programs.
- Annual audits with scoring (Higher/Foundation levels), unannounced options for Star status.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets European retailer demands for private-label supply.
- Reduces audit duplication, enhances market access.
- Mitigates safety risks, builds trust via transparent scoring.
- Drives continuous improvement and supply chain resilience.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, FSMS design, training, validation, audits.
- Applies to food processors globally, site-specific.
- Requires accredited certification bodies, PPA audits (50% on-site).
Key Differences
| Aspect | FISMA | IFS Food |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Federal info systems security via NIST RMF | Food manufacturing safety, quality, processes |
| Industry | US federal agencies, contractors, government | Food processors, packers, retailers globally |
| Nature | Mandatory US federal law, risk-based framework | Voluntary GFSI certification standard |
| Testing | Continuous monitoring, RMF assessments, IG audits | Annual on-site audits, product traceability tests |
| Penalties | Contract loss, debarment, funding cuts | Certification denial, market access loss |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about FISMA and IFS Food
FISMA FAQ
IFS Food FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
NIST CSF 2.0 Supply Chain Risk Management: Complete Playbook with Profiles, Tiers, and Vendor Assessment Templates
Master NIST CSF 2.0 ID.SC supply chain risk management with vendor assessment templates, profile gap analysis, and tier strategies. Mitigate third-party threats
Why the SEC Stepped In: The Investor-Driven Push for Cybersecurity Transparency
Discover why the SEC's 2023 cybersecurity rules treat cyber risks as material financial threats. Explore the 'stick and carrot' approach for standardized disclo
Measuring NIST CSF 2.0 Success: KPIs, Dashboards, and Continuous Improvement Using Tiers & Profiles
Transform NIST CSF 2.0 into quantifiable success: Define board-ready KPIs for Functions, build Profile dashboards, track Tier progression. Prove ROI amid cyber
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PDPA vs ISO 56002
PDPA vs ISO 56002: Compare Singapore data privacy law with innovation management standards. Balance compliance, risk & agility for business growth—expert roadmap inside!
ISO 14001 vs HITRUST CSF
Compare ISO 14001 vs HITRUST CSF: EMS excellence meets cybersecurity assurance. Uncover differences, integration strategies & compliance wins—boost your strategy now.
WEEE vs SAMA CSF
Compare WEEE vs SAMA CSF: EU e-waste rules meet Saudi cyber framework. Unlock compliance strategies, risks & best practices for global execs. Read now!