Standards Comparison

    FISMA

    Mandatory
    2014

    U.S. federal law for risk-based cybersecurity management

    VS

    ISO 26000

    Voluntary
    2010

    International guidance standard for social responsibility

    Quick Verdict

    FISMA mandates risk-based cybersecurity for US federal agencies and contractors via NIST RMF, while ISO 26000 provides voluntary guidance on social responsibility principles for all organizations globally. Agencies comply with FISMA legally; companies adopt ISO 26000 for ethical strategy and stakeholder trust.

    Cybersecurity

    FISMA

    Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF)
    • Requires continuous monitoring and authorization
    • Enforces FIPS 199 system impact categorization
    • Demands annual IG independent evaluations
    • Applies to agencies and contractors
    Social Responsibility

    ISO 26000

    ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Seven principles underpinning all SR activities
    • Seven core subjects for holistic impact coverage
    • Non-certifiable guidance for all organizations
    • Stakeholder engagement for issue prioritization
    • Integration into existing management systems

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    FISMA Details

    What It Is

    Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) of 2014 is a U.S. federal law establishing a risk-based framework for protecting federal information and systems. It mandates agency-wide information security programs using the NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF), focusing on confidentiality, integrity, and availability via continuous monitoring.

    Key Components

    • Seven-step RMF: Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor.
    • NIST SP 800-53 controls tailored by FIPS 199 impact levels.
    • Annual reporting, IG assessments, and CISA/OMB oversight.
    • No formal certification; compliance via ATOs and metrics.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Federal agencies and contractors must comply to avoid penalties, debarment, and funding loss. It reduces risks, enables market access, builds resilience, and aligns cybersecurity with missions for strategic advantage.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased RMF application: inventory assets, categorize systems, deploy controls, assess, authorize, monitor continuously. Applies to agencies, contractors handling federal data; suits all sizes via tailoring. Involves audits, POA&Ms, no external certification.

    ISO 26000 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 26000:2010 is an international guidance standard on social responsibility (SR), providing a voluntary framework for organizations to address impacts on society and the environment. Its scope covers all organization types, sizes, and locations, using a holistic, principles-based approach with stakeholder engagement for contextual prioritization.

    Key Components

    • Seven **core subjectsorganizational governance, human rights, labor practices, environment, fair operating practices, consumer issues, community involvement.
    • Seven **principlesaccountability, transparency, ethical behavior, respect for stakeholder interests, rule of law, international norms, human rights.
    • No certifiable requirements; focuses on integration and self-assessment.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Enhances sustainability commitment, risk management, and stakeholder trust. Aligns with SDGs, OECD, GRI; reduces reputational risks, improves resilience, supports ESG reporting without certification burdens.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: materiality assessment, stakeholder engagement, policy integration, training, reporting. Applicable universally; no audits required, but transparency via ISO Communication Protocol recommended. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    FISMA
    Federal info security, CIA triad, RMF lifecycle
    ISO 26000
    Social responsibility, 7 core subjects, principles

    Industry

    FISMA
    US federal agencies, contractors, civilian systems
    ISO 26000
    All organizations, sectors, global applicability

    Nature

    FISMA
    Mandatory US law, risk-based framework
    ISO 26000
    Voluntary guidance, non-certifiable

    Testing

    FISMA
    Continuous monitoring, IG assessments, RMF ATO
    ISO 26000
    Self-assessment, stakeholder engagement, no certification

    Penalties

    FISMA
    Contract loss, debarment, IG reports, remediation
    ISO 26000
    No legal penalties, reputational risks only

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about FISMA and ISO 26000

    FISMA FAQ

    ISO 26000 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages