Standards Comparison

    FISMA

    Mandatory
    2014

    U.S. federal law mandating risk-based cybersecurity programs

    VS

    MAS TRM

    Mandatory
    2021

    Singapore guidelines for financial technology risk management

    Quick Verdict

    FISMA mandates risk-based cybersecurity for US federal systems via NIST RMF, ensuring compliance for agencies and contractors. MAS TRM provides supervisory guidelines for Singapore FIs, emphasizing proportional governance and cyber resilience. Organizations adopt them for regulatory adherence and operational security.

    Cybersecurity

    FISMA

    Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates NIST RMF 7-step risk management lifecycle
    • Requires continuous monitoring and ongoing authorization
    • Enforces FIPS 199 system impact categorization
    • Demands NIST SP 800-53 tailored security controls
    • Imposes annual IG independent program assessments
    Technology Risk Management

    MAS TRM

    MAS Technology Risk Management Guidelines

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Board and senior management accountability
    • Proportional controls by risk criticality
    • Third-party risk as control extension
    • Defence-in-depth cyber resilience
    • Annual pen testing for internet systems

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    FISMA Details

    What It Is

    Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) of 2014 is a U.S. federal law establishing a risk-based framework for protecting federal information and systems. It mandates agency-wide information security programs using NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF) for confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

    Key Components

    • NIST RMF 7 steps: Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor.
    • NIST SP 800-53 controls tailored by FIPS 199 impact levels (Low/Moderate/High).
    • Continuous monitoring, POA&Ms, annual IG assessments.
    • Oversight by OMB, DHS/CISA.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Federal agencies and contractors must comply to avoid noncompliance penalties, contract loss, debarment. Provides risk reduction, market access, operational efficiency, trust-building.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased RMF approach: governance/inventory, categorize/select controls, implement/assess/authorize, monitor. Applies to agencies, contractors; requires SSPs, audits. Scales from small to enterprise via automation.

    MAS TRM Details

    What It Is

    MAS Technology Risk Management (TRM) Guidelines (revised January 2021) are supervisory guidance issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore for financial institutions. They provide a principles-based framework for managing technology and cyber risks, emphasizing governance, controls, and resilience to protect confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of systems and data.

    Key Components

    • 15 main sections covering governance, risk frameworks, secure development, IT service management, resilience, access controls, cryptography, cyber operations, assessments, and audit.
    • Synthesised into 12 core principles like board accountability, asset classification, third-party oversight, and defence-in-depth.
    • Proportional implementation based on risk profile; no fixed controls but minimums like annual staff training and pen testing.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Ensures MAS supervisory compliance and avoids enforcement actions like fines.
    • Enhances cyber resilience, operational stability, and customer trust.
    • Supports digital transformation while managing third-party and ecosystem risks.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased approach: governance setup, asset inventory, risk assessment, control deployment, testing.
    • Applies to all MAS-supervised FIs; scalable by size/complexity.
    • No formal certification; demonstrated via audits, metrics, and board reporting. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    FISMA
    Federal info systems, RMF lifecycle, continuous monitoring
    MAS TRM
    Financial sector tech risks, governance to cyber ops

    Industry

    FISMA
    US federal agencies, contractors, nationwide
    MAS TRM
    Singapore financial institutions, regional focus

    Nature

    FISMA
    Mandatory US law, NIST RMF enforcement via oversight
    MAS TRM
    Supervisory guidelines, proportional implementation

    Testing

    FISMA
    RMF assessments, continuous monitoring, IG audits
    MAS TRM
    Annual PT for internet systems, VA, cyber exercises

    Penalties

    FISMA
    Contract loss, debarment, IG directives, funding cuts
    MAS TRM
    Fines, license conditions, enforcement actions

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about FISMA and MAS TRM

    FISMA FAQ

    MAS TRM FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages