Standards Comparison

    FISMA

    Mandatory
    2014

    U.S. federal law for risk-based cybersecurity management

    VS

    NIST 800-171

    Mandatory
    2020

    U.S. standard for protecting CUI in nonfederal systems.

    Quick Verdict

    FISMA mandates comprehensive security programs for federal agencies via NIST RMF, while NIST 800-171 provides tailored controls for contractors protecting CUI. Agencies ensure compliance through oversight; contractors demonstrate via SSPs/POA&Ms to win contracts and reduce breach risks.

    Cybersecurity

    FISMA

    Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates NIST RMF 7-step risk management process
    • Requires continuous monitoring and diagnostics program
    • Enforces Authorization to Operate decisions
    • Demands annual IG independent assessments
    • Extends requirements to contractors and supply chains
    Controlled Unclassified Information

    NIST 800-171

    NIST SP 800-171 Protecting CUI in Nonfederal Systems

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Scoped CUI protection in nonfederal systems
    • 110 requirements across 17 control families
    • Mandatory SSP and POA&M documentation
    • Examine/interview/test assessment procedures
    • FedRAMP Moderate cloud equivalence support

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    FISMA Details

    What It Is

    Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) of 2014 is a U.S. federal law establishing a risk-based framework for protecting federal information and systems. It mandates agency-wide security programs ensuring confidentiality, integrity, and availability, primarily via NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF) with seven steps: Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor.

    Key Components

    • Core pillars: system categorization (FIPS 199), NIST SP 800-53 controls (20 families), continuous monitoring (SP 800-137).
    • Built on RMF lifecycle; no fixed control count but baselines by impact level.
    • Compliance via Authorization to Operate (ATO), POA&Ms, IG evaluations using maturity models aligned to NIST CSF functions.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Federal agencies and contractors must comply to avoid penalties, IG reports, contract loss. It reduces risks, enables market access (e.g., FedRAMP), builds resilience, and aligns cybersecurity with missions for efficiency and trust.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased RMF approach: governance/inventory, categorize/select/implement controls, assess/authorize, continuous monitor. Applies to agencies, contractors; suits all sizes via tailoring. Requires annual audits, no central certification but reciprocal ATOs.

    NIST 800-171 Details

    What It Is

    NIST SP 800-171 (Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations) is a U.S. government framework providing security requirements for safeguarding CUI confidentiality in nonfederal systems. It applies a tailored, control-based approach derived from NIST SP 800-53 Moderate baseline, focusing on components that process, store, transmit CUI, or protect them.

    Key Components

    • 17 families in Rev 3 (e.g., Access Control, Audit, Supply Chain Risk Management), with ~97-110 requirements.
    • Core elements: SSP (System Security Plan), POA&M (Plan of Action and Milestones), SP 800-171A assessment procedures (examine/interview/test).
    • Built on FIPS 200, aligned with SP 800-53; supports tailoring and compensating controls.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory via contracts like DFARS 252.204-7012 for DoD contractors.
    • Reduces breach risks, ensures contract eligibility, builds supply chain trust.
    • Enhances resilience, competitive edge in federal procurement.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: scoping CUI enclave, gap analysis, control implementation, evidence collection.
    • Targets contractors handling CUI; self/third-party assessments via CMMC/SPRS.
    • Scalable for SMBs (enclaves) to enterprises; 6-36 months typical.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about FISMA and NIST 800-171

    FISMA FAQ

    NIST 800-171 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages