FISMA
U.S. federal law for risk-based cybersecurity management
NIST 800-171
U.S. standard for protecting CUI in nonfederal systems.
Quick Verdict
FISMA mandates comprehensive security programs for federal agencies via NIST RMF, while NIST 800-171 provides tailored controls for contractors protecting CUI. Agencies ensure compliance through oversight; contractors demonstrate via SSPs/POA&Ms to win contracts and reduce breach risks.
FISMA
Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014
Key Features
- Mandates NIST RMF 7-step risk management process
- Requires continuous monitoring and diagnostics program
- Enforces Authorization to Operate decisions
- Demands annual IG independent assessments
- Extends requirements to contractors and supply chains
NIST 800-171
NIST SP 800-171 Protecting CUI in Nonfederal Systems
Key Features
- Scoped CUI protection in nonfederal systems
- 110 requirements across 17 control families
- Mandatory SSP and POA&M documentation
- Examine/interview/test assessment procedures
- FedRAMP Moderate cloud equivalence support
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
FISMA Details
What It Is
Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) of 2014 is a U.S. federal law establishing a risk-based framework for protecting federal information and systems. It mandates agency-wide security programs ensuring confidentiality, integrity, and availability, primarily via NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF) with seven steps: Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor.
Key Components
- Core pillars: system categorization (FIPS 199), NIST SP 800-53 controls (20 families), continuous monitoring (SP 800-137).
- Built on RMF lifecycle; no fixed control count but baselines by impact level.
- Compliance via Authorization to Operate (ATO), POA&Ms, IG evaluations using maturity models aligned to NIST CSF functions.
Why Organizations Use It
Federal agencies and contractors must comply to avoid penalties, IG reports, contract loss. It reduces risks, enables market access (e.g., FedRAMP), builds resilience, and aligns cybersecurity with missions for efficiency and trust.
Implementation Overview
Phased RMF approach: governance/inventory, categorize/select/implement controls, assess/authorize, continuous monitor. Applies to agencies, contractors; suits all sizes via tailoring. Requires annual audits, no central certification but reciprocal ATOs.
NIST 800-171 Details
What It Is
NIST SP 800-171 (Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations) is a U.S. government framework providing security requirements for safeguarding CUI confidentiality in nonfederal systems. It applies a tailored, control-based approach derived from NIST SP 800-53 Moderate baseline, focusing on components that process, store, transmit CUI, or protect them.
Key Components
- 17 families in Rev 3 (e.g., Access Control, Audit, Supply Chain Risk Management), with ~97-110 requirements.
- Core elements: SSP (System Security Plan), POA&M (Plan of Action and Milestones), SP 800-171A assessment procedures (examine/interview/test).
- Built on FIPS 200, aligned with SP 800-53; supports tailoring and compensating controls.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory via contracts like DFARS 252.204-7012 for DoD contractors.
- Reduces breach risks, ensures contract eligibility, builds supply chain trust.
- Enhances resilience, competitive edge in federal procurement.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: scoping CUI enclave, gap analysis, control implementation, evidence collection.
- Targets contractors handling CUI; self/third-party assessments via CMMC/SPRS.
- Scalable for SMBs (enclaves) to enterprises; 6-36 months typical.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about FISMA and NIST 800-171
FISMA FAQ
NIST 800-171 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions
Unpack NIST CSF 2.0's enhanced Core Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. Get SME playbooks, governance shifts & strategies for cyber

SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder with Real-World Analogies
Decode SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria (Security, Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity, Privacy) into plain English with tables, TL;DRs & analogies

Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software
Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
GMP vs ISO 41001
Compare GMP vs ISO 41001: Key differences in manufacturing quality controls and facility management systems. Discover compliance strategies, risks, and implementation for optimal operations.
ISO 27001 vs APPI
Discover ISO 27001 vs APPI: Compare global ISMS standard with Japan's privacy law. Master compliance, mitigate risks, align security & data protection. Unlock insights now!
RoHS vs WELL
RoHS vs WELL: EU Directive restricts 10 hazardous substances in EEE for safer recycling; WELL certifies buildings for occupant health via air, light & wellness. Master compliance now.