Standards Comparison

    FISMA

    Mandatory
    2014

    U.S. federal law for risk-based cybersecurity management

    VS

    SQF

    Voluntary
    2023

    GFSI-benchmarked certification for food safety management

    Quick Verdict

    FISMA mandates risk-based cybersecurity for US federal agencies and contractors via NIST RMF, while SQF is a voluntary GFSI certification ensuring HACCP-driven food safety. Agencies comply legally; food firms adopt for market access and resilience.

    Cybersecurity

    FISMA

    Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates NIST RMF 7-step risk process
    • Requires continuous monitoring and diagnostics
    • Enforces FIPS 199 system categorization
    • Demands SSPs assessments and ATOs
    • Multi-stakeholder oversight by OMB DHS IGs
    Agile Scaling

    SQF

    Safe Quality Food (SQF) Code Edition 9

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Modular structure: Module 2 plus sector-specific GMP modules
    • HACCP-based food safety plan with validation/verification
    • Mandatory on-site SQF Practitioner role
    • GFSI-benchmarked with annual third-party audits
    • Traceability, recall, and crisis management requirements

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    FISMA Details

    What It Is

    Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) of 2014 is a U.S. federal law mandating risk-based frameworks for protecting federal information systems. It requires agency-wide security programs via NIST RMF 7-step process: Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor.

    Key Components

    • FIPS 199 system categorization (low/moderate/high impact)
    • NIST SP 800-53 controls selection/tailoring
    • Continuous monitoring, SSPs, POA&Ms, ATOs
    • Metrics-aligned oversight by OMB, DHS/CISA, IGs

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for federal agencies/contractors handling federal data
    • Reduces breach risks, ensures resilience/mission continuity
    • Enables contract awards, FedRAMP cloud reuse
    • Builds stakeholder trust via independent assessments

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased RMF lifecycle with inventory/gap analysis
    • Control deployment, assessments, ongoing monitoring
    • Applies to agencies/contractors; scalable by size/complexity
    • Annual IG audits, no central certification

    SQF Details

    What It Is

    Safe Quality Food (SQF) is a GFSI-benchmarked certification program and HACCP-based management system for ensuring food safety and quality across the supply chain, from farm to fork. Its primary scope covers manufacturing, storage, distribution, and more, using a risk-based, modular approach with universal system elements and sector-specific Good Practices.

    Key Components

    • Modular architectureModule 2** (system elements like management commitment, HACCP plans, verification) paired with sector modules (e.g., Module 11 for processing GMPs).
    • Over 100 auditable clauses emphasizing PRPs, traceability, allergens, food defense.
    • Built on Codex HACCP principles; certification via third-party audits with scoring (E/G/C/F grades).

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Meets retailer/brand requirements as a "license to trade".
    • Reduces recalls, audit duplication; aligns with FSMA/EU regs.
    • Builds food safety culture, supplier trust, operational resilience.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, documentation, training, internal audits, certification audit.
    • Applies to all sizes/industries; requires SQF Practitioner, annual audits (some unannounced). (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    FISMA
    Federal info systems cybersecurity risk management
    SQF
    Food safety, quality, HACCP-based management systems

    Industry

    FISMA
    US federal agencies, contractors, government
    SQF
    Food manufacturing, storage, distribution, global

    Nature

    FISMA
    Mandatory US federal law, NIST RMF framework
    SQF
    Voluntary GFSI-benchmarked certification scheme

    Testing

    FISMA
    Continuous monitoring, IG annual assessments, ATO
    SQF
    Annual third-party audits, unannounced, nonconformance grading

    Penalties

    FISMA
    Contract loss, debarment, OMB directives, IG reports
    SQF
    Certification loss, market access denial, no legal fines

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about FISMA and SQF

    FISMA FAQ

    SQF FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages