GDPR UK
UK regulation for personal data protection and privacy
23 NYCRR 500
NY regulation for financial services cybersecurity compliance.
Quick Verdict
GDPR UK enforces data protection for all UK personal data handlers with principles and rights, while 23 NYCRR 500 mandates cybersecurity for NY financial firms via MFA, testing, and 72-hour reporting. Organizations adopt them for legal compliance and risk reduction.
GDPR UK
UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR)
Key Features
- Accountability principle requiring demonstrable compliance evidence
- Seven core data processing principles enforced legally
- Fines up to 4% global annual turnover
- 72-hour ICO breach notification obligation
- Extra-territorial scope for non-UK entities targeting UK
23 NYCRR 500
23 NYCRR Part 500 Cybersecurity Regulation
Key Features
- 72-hour cybersecurity incident notification to NYDFS
- Annual CEO/CISO dual-signature compliance certification
- Phishing-resistant MFA for privileged and remote access
- Risk-based third-party service provider oversight
- Annual penetration testing and vulnerability assessments
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
GDPR UK Details
What It Is
UK GDPR is the UK General Data Protection Regulation, the post-Brexit retained version of EU Regulation 2016/679, domesticated via the Data Protection Act 2018. It is a binding legal regulation enforced by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), applying a risk-based, accountability-focused approach to personal data processing by controllers and processors.
Key Components
- Seven core principles: lawfulness, purpose limitation, data minimisation, accuracy, storage limitation, integrity/confidentiality, accountability.
- Individual rights (access, rectification, erasure, portability, objection).
- Controller/processor obligations (records, contracts, DPIAs, security).
- No formal certification; compliance demonstrated via documentation, audits, ICO engagement.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for UK-established entities and those targeting UK individuals; extra-territorial reach.
- Mitigates fines up to £17.5M or 4% global turnover.
- Builds trust, enables secure data use, supports cross-border operations.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: data mapping (RoPA), policies/contracts, rights/breach processes, DPIAs, training. Applies to all sizes handling UK personal data; ongoing ICO audits possible. (178 words)
23 NYCRR 500 Details
What It Is
23 NYCRR Part 500 is the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) cybersecurity regulation for financial services entities. It establishes minimum, risk-based cybersecurity requirements to protect nonpublic information (NPI) and information systems' confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Scope covers NY-licensed banks, insurers, mortgage firms, and virtual currency entities, with a hybrid approach blending prescriptive controls and tailored risk assessments.
Key Components
- 14 core requirements including cybersecurity program (§500.2), CISO (§500.4), MFA (§500.12), encryption (§500.15), pen testing (§500.5), TPSP oversight (§500.11), and 72-hour incident reporting (§500.17).
- Built on risk assessment (§500.9) as foundation; annual CEO/CISO certification with 5-year record retention.
- Compliance model: self-attestation, DFS examinations, no formal certification but Class A companies require enhanced audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for Covered Entities to avoid multimillion-dollar fines (e.g., Robinhood $30M).
- Enhances resilience, reduces incident risk, builds stakeholder trust.
- Strategic benefits: aligns with NIST, lowers insurance premiums, differentiates in vendor selection.
Implementation Overview
- Phased roadmap: gap analysis, risk assessment, control deployment (MFA, asset inventory), TPSP contracts, testing.
- Applies to NY-regulated financial firms; scalable by size (limited exemptions for small entities).
- No external certification; focus on evidence for annual April 15 filing and audits. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | GDPR UK | 23 NYCRR 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Personal data processing principles, rights, security | Cybersecurity program, MFA, encryption, incident response |
| Industry | All sectors handling UK personal data | NY financial services licensees only |
| Nature | Mandatory UK-wide data protection law | Mandatory NYDFS cybersecurity regulation |
| Testing | DPIAs for high-risk processing | Annual pen testing, vulnerability assessments |
| Penalties | £17.5M or 4% global turnover fines | Multi-million consent orders, license actions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about GDPR UK and 23 NYCRR 500
GDPR UK FAQ
23 NYCRR 500 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
NIST 800-53 Private Sector ROI Reality Check: Isolating Control Family Impacts on 2024 Breach Costs
Discover NIST 800-53 ROI in private sector: control families like RA, SI, SR reduce median breach costs from $100K to under $50K. Get benchmarks to prioritize i
ISO 27701 Standalone Certification in 2025: Debunking Myths and Navigating the New Reality
Debunk myths on ISO 27701 standalone certification post-2025. Clarify viability, accreditation bodies, ISO 27001 audit differences & procurement benefits. Guide
CIS Controls v8.1 Metrics That Matter: KPIs, KRIs, and Dashboards for Board-Ready Cyber Reporting
Quantify CIS Controls v8.1 success with KPIs, KRIs & dashboards. Learn what to measure, calculations, and executive presentations linking security to business r
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
UL Certification vs SQF
Unlock UL Certification vs SQF: UL for NRTL safety marks & factory audits; SQF for GFSI food safety, HACCP & GMP modules. Choose right for compliance wins!
SOC 2 vs ISO 27017
Compare SOC 2 vs ISO 27017: Decode Trust Services Criteria, cloud-specific controls & shared responsibilities. Boost compliance, cut risks—pick your security framework now.
SAFe vs IEC 62443
Discover SAFe vs IEC 62443: Scale agile enterprises with SAFe frameworks or secure OT systems via IEC standards. Compare agility, compliance benefits. Optimize now!