What is the primary objective of **GDPR**?

**The primary objective of GDPR is to protect the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons with regard to the processing of their personal data, while facilitating the free flow of personal data within the EU internal market.** Adopted in 2016 and enforceable from **May 25, 2018**, it replaces the 1995 Data Protection Directive (95/46/EC), addressing its fragmentation by establishing uniform rules as a directly applicable Regulation. Core principles under **Article 5** include lawfulness, fairness, transparency, purpose limitation, data minimisation, accuracy, storage limitation, integrity/confidentiality, and accountability, with personal data broadly defined to include any information relating to an identifiable natural person, such as IP addresses or genetic data.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **GDPR**?

**GDPR applies to any controller or processor established in the EU, or any non-EU entity offering goods/services to or monitoring the behaviour of EU data subjects, regardless of location.** Under **Article 3**, its extraterritorial scope captures global organisations processing EU residents' data. Controllers determine processing purposes/means; processors act on controllers' behalf. Mandatory **Data Protection Officers (DPOs)** are required for public authorities or entities engaging in large-scale systematic monitoring of special categories of data (**Article 37**).

Does **GDPR** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**GDPR does not mandate external audits or third-party certification for general compliance.** However, it promotes voluntary mechanisms under **Articles 40-42**, including codes of conduct and certification schemes approved by supervisory authorities to demonstrate compliance. **Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs)** are mandatory for high-risk processing (**Article 35**), with supervisory authorities able to review them, but no routine external audit is prescribed.

How often should an assessment for **GDPR** be performed?

**GDPR requires ongoing, risk-based assessments rather than fixed periodic reviews.** **Article 32** mandates controllers implement security measures appropriate to risks, implying continuous evaluation of "state of the art" threats. **DPIAs** under **Article 35** must be conducted prior to high-risk processing and reviewed if risks change. **Records of Processing Activities (ROPAs)** under **Article 30** must be maintained and updated regularly.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **GDPR**?

**Non-compliance with GDPR can result in administrative fines up to €20 million or 4% of total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher, for severe infringements.** Tiered penalties apply under **Article 83up to €10 million or 2% for lesser violations (e.g., records obligations). Supervisory authorities enforce via the one-stop-shop mechanism (**Article 56**), with additional remedies including data subject compensation (**Article 82**) and judicial redress.

Can **GDPR** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**GDPR principles and requirements can be mapped to other international frameworks through adequacy decisions, Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs), or Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs).** **Article 45** grants adequacy status to third countries ensuring an "essentially equivalent" protection level (e.g., Japan, Canada). Post-Schrems II, transfers require transfer impact assessments. While not a direct mapping standard, its accountability and rights-based approach influences global laws.

What is the first step to begin implementing **GDPR**?

**The first step to implement GDPR is to conduct a comprehensive data mapping and appoint a Data Protection Officer (DPO) if required.** Identify all personal data processing activities to create **Records of Processing Activities (ROPAs)** under **Article 30**, determine lawful bases (**Article 6**), and assess DPO necessity (**Article 37**). This enables subsequent steps like DPIAs and privacy-by-design (**Article 25**).

What is the primary objective of **ISO 20000**?

**The primary objective of ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018 is to specify requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving a service management system (SMS).** This ensures organizations deliver services across their lifecycle—planning, design, transition, delivery, and improvement—meeting agreed requirements through Clauses 4–10 under Annex SL structure, incorporating PDCA for measurable outcomes.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 20000**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 20000, as it is a voluntary international standard.** Professionally, service providers (ITSM, cloud, managed services), enterprises with internal IT services, and those in regulated sectors like finance or telco adopt it for certification to demonstrate reliable service delivery, market differentiation, and customer trust via auditable SMS.

Does **ISO 20000** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 20000 certification requires external audits by accredited certification bodies through Stage 1 (readiness review) and Stage 2 (effectiveness audit).** Ongoing surveillance audits occur annually, with recertification every three years, verifying SMS conformity via Clauses 4–10 evidence including processes, metrics, and management reviews.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 20000** be performed?

**Internal assessments for ISO 20000 must be performed at planned intervals via mandatory internal audits under Clause 9.2.** These feed into management reviews (Clause 9.3), with external surveillance audits typically annually and full recertification every three years to ensure continual SMS improvement per PDCA.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 20000**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 20000 results in certification denial, suspension, or withdrawal by accredited bodies.** Operationally, it leads to unproven service reliability, lost contracts, heightened outage risks, and customer distrust; no direct legal penalties apply, but it amplifies exposure in regulated environments lacking SMS evidence.

Can **ISO 20000** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 20000-1:2018 uses Annex SL High-Level Structure, enabling seamless mapping to other management system standards.** Clause alignment supports integrated systems, with operational processes (e.g., incident management, service assurance) compatible with ITIL practices while maintaining flexibility for DevOps or SIAM.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 20000**?

**The first step to implement ISO 20000 is conducting a clause-by-clause gap analysis against Clauses 4–10 to assess current SMS maturity.** This identifies evidence gaps, defines scope (services, customers, locations), prioritizes remediation, and informs the service management plan under Clause 6.

GDPR vs ISO 20000

Standards Comparison

GDPR

Mandatory

2016

EU regulation protecting personal data and privacy rights

ISO 20000

Voluntary

2018

International standard for service management systems

Quick Verdict

GDPR mandates data privacy compliance for EU data processors worldwide with hefty fines, while ISO 20000 certifies voluntary service management excellence. Companies adopt GDPR to avoid penalties, ISO 20000 for operational reliability and market trust.

Data Privacy

GDPR

Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Extraterritorial scope targeting non-EU entities serving EU residents
Accountability principle requiring demonstrable compliance via DPIAs
Fines up to 4% of global annual turnover for violations
Enhanced data subject rights including erasure and portability
72-hour mandatory personal data breach notification

IT Service Management

ISO 20000

ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018 Service management system requirements

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Annex SL structure enables integration with ISO 9001/27001
Full service lifecycle from portfolio to assurance processes
Risk-based planning with measurable objectives and PDCA
Mandatory leadership commitment and internal audits
Multi-supplier control throughout service lifecycle

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

GDPR Details

What It Is

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), officially Regulation (EU) 2016/679, is a binding EU regulation enacted in 2016 and enforceable since May 25, 2018. It safeguards natural persons' personal data across the EU and beyond, replacing the 1995 Data Protection Directive. GDPR employs a principles-based, accountability-driven approach with extraterritorial scope, applying to any entity processing EU residents' data.

Key Components

**Seven core principleslawfulness/fairness/transparency, purpose limitation, data minimization, accuracy, storage limitation, integrity/confidentiality, accountability.
**Data subject rightsaccess, rectification, erasure ('right to be forgotten'), portability, objection, restriction.
Obligations include DPO appointment, DPIAs for high-risk processing, ROPA maintenance, 72-hour breach notifications.
Enforced by DPAs via fines up to €20M or 4% global turnover; no formal certification but demonstrable compliance required.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for EU data processors worldwide, minimizing legal risks and fines. Enhances trust, supports Digital Single Market, sets global 'gold standard' influencing laws like LGPD/CCPA. Drives risk management, innovation balance, reputation.

Implementation Overview

Gap analysis, policy/tech updates, training, audits. Applies universally by org size/industry if handling EU data. Resource-intensive, 18-24 months typical; ongoing DPA oversight.

ISO 20000 Details

What It Is

ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018 is the international certifiable standard for establishing, implementing, and improving a service management system (SMS). It provides auditable requirements for managing the full service lifecycle—planning, design, transition, delivery, and improvement—to ensure consistent service quality. Built on Annex SL high-level structure and PDCA cycle, it emphasizes risk-based thinking and flexibility for methods like ITIL or DevOps.

Key Components

Clauses 4–10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, and improvement.
Operational domains: service portfolio, relationships, supply/demand, design/transition, resolution/fulfilment, assurance.
Core processes: incident/problem management, change/release, configuration/asset, availability/continuity, security.
Certifiable via accredited bodies with Stage 1/2 audits, surveillance, recertification.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives reliability, customer trust, risk reduction (e.g., 50% certificate growth).
Enables market differentiation, procurement wins, integration with ISO 9001/27001.
Meets stakeholder demands for verifiable governance in IT/cloud/services.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, design, deployment, audits (12-18 months typical).
Applies to all sizes/industries; requires leadership, training, tooling.
Certification demands evidence of effective SMS operation.

Key Differences

Aspect	GDPR	ISO 20000
Scope	Personal data protection and privacy rights	Service management systems and IT delivery
Industry	All sectors processing EU data globally	Service providers across all industries
Nature	Mandatory EU regulation with fines	Voluntary certifiable management standard
Testing	DPIAs for high-risk processing	Internal audits and certification audits
Penalties	Up to 4% global turnover fines	Loss of certification, no legal fines

Scope

GDPR

Personal data protection and privacy rights

ISO 20000

Service management systems and IT delivery

Industry

GDPR

All sectors processing EU data globally

ISO 20000

Service providers across all industries

Nature

GDPR

Mandatory EU regulation with fines

ISO 20000

Voluntary certifiable management standard

Testing

GDPR

DPIAs for high-risk processing

ISO 20000

Internal audits and certification audits

Penalties

GDPR

Up to 4% global turnover fines

ISO 20000

Loss of certification, no legal fines

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about GDPR and ISO 20000

GDPR FAQ

ISO 20000 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 Private Sector Tailoring Blueprint: First 5 Steps to Overlay-Driven Compliance with Infographic

Step-by-step blueprint for private sector NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 tailoring using overlays for AI & supply chain risks. Infographic + first 5 steps for ROI-drive

The Service-Oriented SOC: Leveraging Maturity Assessments to Guarantee SLOs and Operational Predictability

Transform your SOC into a service provider using maturity assessments to standardize workflows, guarantee SLOs, and ensure predictability amid turnover and risi

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates

Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

PMBOK vs GLBA

Compare PMBOK vs GLBA: Unlock how PMI's project standards meet financial privacy laws. Tailor processes for compliance, risk mgmt & secure delivery. Optimize regulated projects today!

EN 1090 vs NERC CIP

Compare EN 1090 vs NERC CIP: EU steel/aluminum standards for CE marking & execution classes vs US grid cybersecurity. Unlock compliance insights for global ops. Read now!

COPPA vs ISO 50001

COPPA vs ISO 50001: Kids' privacy law ($170M fines, under-13 consent) vs energy mgmt std (PDCA, EnPIs). Compare compliance, risks & strategies—boost yours now!

GDPR

ISO 20000

Quick Verdict

GDPR

Key Features

ISO 20000

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

GDPR Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 20000 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

GDPR FAQ

What is the primary objective of GDPR?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with GDPR?

Does GDPR require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for GDPR be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with GDPR?

Can GDPR be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing GDPR?

ISO 20000 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 20000?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 20000?

Does ISO 20000 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 20000 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 20000?

Can ISO 20000 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 20000?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 Private Sector Tailoring Blueprint: First 5 Steps to Overlay-Driven Compliance with Infographic

The Service-Oriented SOC: Leveraging Maturity Assessments to Guarantee SLOs and Operational Predictability

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

PMBOK vs GLBA

EN 1090 vs NERC CIP

COPPA vs ISO 50001