GDPR
EU regulation for personal data protection and privacy
SOX
U.S. law for financial reporting and internal controls integrity
Quick Verdict
GDPR protects personal data privacy globally for EU subjects with strict consent rules, while SOX mandates financial reporting controls for US public firms via ICFR audits. Companies adopt GDPR for compliance and trust, SOX for investor protection and governance.
GDPR
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation)
Key Features
- Accountability principle requiring demonstrable compliance measures
- Extraterritorial scope applying to non-EU entities targeting EU
- Fines up to 4% of global annual turnover
- Data subject rights including erasure and portability
- 72-hour mandatory data breach notification requirement
SOX
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Key Features
- CEO/CFO personal certification of financial reports (§302)
- Management ICFR assessment and auditor attestation (§404)
- PCAOB oversight of public company auditors (Title I)
- Auditor independence and rotation requirements (Title II)
- Whistleblower protections and document retention (§806/802)
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
GDPR Details
What It Is
Regulation (EU) 2016/679, known as GDPR, is a directly applicable EU regulation protecting personal data of EU residents. It modernizes privacy laws with a risk-based accountability approach, applying extraterritorially to any entity processing EU data.
Key Components
- Seven core principles: lawfulness, purpose limitation, minimization, accuracy, storage limitation, integrity/confidentiality, accountability.
- Enhanced data subject rights (access, rectification, erasure, portability, objection).
- Obligations like DPIAs, DPO appointment, breach notifications within 72 hours.
- Enforcement via fines up to 4% global turnover; no formal certification but compliance demonstration required.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for EU data processors to avoid massive fines, ensure legal compliance, manage risks from breaches. Builds stakeholder trust, enables global operations as gold standard, inspires competitive privacy leadership.
Implementation Overview
Involves mapping data flows, appointing DPO, conducting DPIAs, training staff, updating contracts. Applies to all sizes/industries processing EU data globally; ongoing audits, no central certification but DPA oversight.
SOX Details
What It Is
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) is a U.S. federal statute mandating corporate accountability and investor protection. Enacted post-Enron scandals, it targets accurate financial disclosures via risk-based internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR).
Key Components
- **Three pillarsPCAOB oversight (Title I), auditor independence (Title II), executive certifications and ICFR (Titles III-IV).
- Core sections: §302 (CEO/CFO certifications), §404 (ICFR assessment/attestation), §409 (real-time disclosures).
- Built on COSO framework; no fixed controls, emphasizes key controls like ITGC, entity-level, financial close.
- Compliance via annual management reports and auditor attestation (exemptions for smaller filers).
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for U.S. public companies; reduces restatements, fraud risk.
- Enhances governance, investor trust, operational efficiency; lowers cost of capital.
- Strategic for IPO/M&A readiness.
Implementation Overview
- **Phased, risk-basedscoping, documentation, testing, monitoring.
- Applies to public issuers; scales by size (exemptions for EGCs/non-accelerated filers).
- Requires external audit for §404(b); ongoing via GRC tools, automation.
Key Differences
| Aspect | GDPR | SOX |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Personal data privacy and protection | Financial reporting and internal controls |
| Industry | All sectors, global (EU data subjects) | Public companies, US-listed |
| Nature | Mandatory EU regulation | Mandatory US federal statute |
| Testing | DPIAs, compliance assessments | Annual ICFR audits and testing |
| Penalties | Up to 4% global turnover | Criminal fines, imprisonment |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about GDPR and SOX
GDPR FAQ
SOX FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption
Bust 10 NIST CSF 2.0 myths like 'only for critical infrastructure' or 'Govern replaces Identify'. Plain-English breakdowns, evidence, and fixes for flexible ris
DORA Third-Party Risk Management: A Consultant’s Guide to Mapping Critical ICT Service Providers in 2026
Navigate DORA's complex third-party risk pillar. Step-by-step consultant guide to identify critical ICT providers, remediate Article 30 contracts, and build the
NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity
Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs ISO 27018
Compare FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs ISO 27018: Decode electronic records rules for FDA compliance & cloud PII protection. Key controls, scope, enforcement—expert insights to align your strategy now.
K-PIPA vs EU AI Act
Compare K-PIPA vs EU AI Act: Korea's consent-driven privacy vs EU's risk-based AI rules. Uncover gaps in breaches, CPOs, fines & strategies. Ensure global compliance now!
PMBOK vs ISO 21001
PMBOK vs ISO 21001: Compare project governance giants—processes, tailoring & domains vs EOMS clauses for education. Unlock compliance, agility & learner outcomes. Discover which wins!