GLBA
U.S. law for financial privacy notices and data safeguards
APRA CPS 234
Australian prudential standard for information security resilience.
Quick Verdict
GLBA mandates US financial privacy notices and safeguards for NPI, while APRA CPS 234 enforces Australian regulated entities' cyber resilience with board accountability. Organizations adopt GLBA for FTC compliance, CPS 234 for prudential oversight.
GLBA
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999
Key Features
- Mandates initial/annual privacy notices and opt-out rights
- Requires written information security program with risk assessments
- Designates Qualified Individual for oversight and board reporting
- Applies broadly to non-bank financial activities and entities
- Imposes 30-day FTC breach notification for 500+ consumers
APRA CPS 234
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security
Key Features
- Board ultimate responsibility for information security
- 72-hour notification for material incidents to APRA
- Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity
- Systematic independent testing of controls
- Third-party capability and control assessments
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
GLBA Details
What It Is
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), enacted in 1999, is a U.S. federal regulation establishing baseline privacy and security for consumer financial data. It targets nonpublic personal information (NPI) handled by financial institutions via a risk-based compliance framework through Privacy Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 313) and Safeguards Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 314).
Key Components
- **Privacy RuleInitial/annual notices, opt-out for nonaffiliate sharing.
- **Safeguards RuleWritten security program with 9+ elements including risk assessments, Qualified Individual designation, testing, vendor oversight.
- **Pretexting protectionsAnti-social engineering measures. No formal certification; enforced by FTC for non-banks.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for broad financial entities (banks, non-banks like tax firms, auto dealers).
- Mitigates enforcement risks (fines up to $100K/violation), enhances trust, reduces breach costs.
- Builds resilience, vendor controls, board governance.
Implementation Overview
Phased: scoping/data mapping, risk assessment, policy/tech controls (encryption, MFA), training, testing, continuous monitoring. Applies to U.S. financial activities; audits via regulators. Typical for mid-size: 6-12 months initial.
APRA CPS 234 Details
What It Is
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding prudential regulation issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority. Effective from 1 July 2019, it mandates APRA-regulated financial entities to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats and vulnerabilities. Its risk-based approach emphasizes governance, controls, testing, and rapid incident reporting to ensure resilience against cyber incidents impacting confidentiality, integrity, or availability of information assets, including those managed by third parties.
Key Components
- 11 core requirements spanning board accountability, role definitions, policy frameworks, asset classification, lifecycle controls, incident response, systematic testing, and internal audit assurance.
- Built on CIA triad principles with commensurability to asset criticality/sensitivity.
- No fixed control count; compliance via evidence-driven assurance, not certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for APRA-regulated entities (banks, insurers, super funds) to avoid penalties, heightened supervision.
- Enhances operational resilience, stakeholder trust, third-party risk management.
- Provides competitive edge through robust cyber posture and regulatory alignment.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, governance setup, asset classification, control deployment, testing programs.
- Applies to all sizes in Australian financial sector; audits via internal/APRA review.
Key Differences
| Aspect | GLBA | APRA CPS 234 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Privacy notices, safeguards for NPI | Information security capability, cyber resilience |
| Industry | US financial institutions, non-banks | Australian regulated banks, insurers, super |
| Nature | Mandatory FTC rules for non-banks | Mandatory prudential standard, board accountable |
| Testing | Penetration testing, vulnerability assessments | Systematic independent testing, annual reviews |
| Penalties | $100k per violation, civil/criminal | Supervisory actions, remediation directions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about GLBA and APRA CPS 234
GLBA FAQ
APRA CPS 234 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Thailand PDPA Implementation Guide: Subordinate Regulations for 72-Hour Breach Reporting and Cross-Border Transfers (2022-2024 Rules)
Step-by-step Thailand PDPA guide: 72-hour breach notifications, cross-border transfers (2022-2024 rules). Risk checklists, GDPR templates avoid THB 5M fines. Mu

Top 5 Reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Overlays Unlock AI Risk Management for Private Sector Enterprises in 2025
Top 5 reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 AI overlays unlock risk management for private enterprises. Tailorable controls combat model poisoning & data leakage. CISO i

CMMC Scoping Mastery for Defense Supply Chains: Enclave Mapping, Subcontractor Flow-Down, and CUI Inventory Blueprint
Master CMMC scoping for DIB: delineate FCI/CUI boundaries, segment enclaves, manage subcontractor flow-down. Prevent 80% assessment failures with SSP templates,
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
TOGAF vs CMMI
Compare TOGAF vs CMMI: Uncover key differences in EA frameworks for architecture governance vs process maturity. Boost IT alignment, ROI, and agility—find your ideal fit now!
ISO 50001 vs AS9110C
Uncover ISO 50001 vs AS9110C: Energy efficiency PDCA meets aerospace MRO quality & safety. Integrate for compliance, cost savings & performance gains—explore now!
PIPL vs GRI
Compare PIPL vs GRI: Master China's data privacy law against global sustainability standards. Expert guide to compliance strategies, risks & advantages for business success. Dive in now!