Standards Comparison

    GLBA

    Mandatory
    1999

    U.S. law for financial privacy notices and data safeguards

    VS

    APRA CPS 234

    Mandatory
    2019

    Australian prudential standard for information security resilience.

    Quick Verdict

    GLBA mandates US financial privacy notices and safeguards for NPI, while APRA CPS 234 enforces Australian regulated entities' cyber resilience with board accountability. Organizations adopt GLBA for FTC compliance, CPS 234 for prudential oversight.

    Financial Privacy

    GLBA

    Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates initial/annual privacy notices and opt-out rights
    • Requires written information security program with risk assessments
    • Designates Qualified Individual for oversight and board reporting
    • Applies broadly to non-bank financial activities and entities
    • Imposes 30-day FTC breach notification for 500+ consumers
    Information Security

    APRA CPS 234

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Board ultimate responsibility for information security
    • 72-hour notification for material incidents to APRA
    • Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity
    • Systematic independent testing of controls
    • Third-party capability and control assessments

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    GLBA Details

    What It Is

    Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), enacted in 1999, is a U.S. federal regulation establishing baseline privacy and security for consumer financial data. It targets nonpublic personal information (NPI) handled by financial institutions via a risk-based compliance framework through Privacy Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 313) and Safeguards Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 314).

    Key Components

    • **Privacy RuleInitial/annual notices, opt-out for nonaffiliate sharing.
    • **Safeguards RuleWritten security program with 9+ elements including risk assessments, Qualified Individual designation, testing, vendor oversight.
    • **Pretexting protectionsAnti-social engineering measures. No formal certification; enforced by FTC for non-banks.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for broad financial entities (banks, non-banks like tax firms, auto dealers).
    • Mitigates enforcement risks (fines up to $100K/violation), enhances trust, reduces breach costs.
    • Builds resilience, vendor controls, board governance.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: scoping/data mapping, risk assessment, policy/tech controls (encryption, MFA), training, testing, continuous monitoring. Applies to U.S. financial activities; audits via regulators. Typical for mid-size: 6-12 months initial.

    APRA CPS 234 Details

    What It Is

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding prudential regulation issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority. Effective from 1 July 2019, it mandates APRA-regulated financial entities to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats and vulnerabilities. Its risk-based approach emphasizes governance, controls, testing, and rapid incident reporting to ensure resilience against cyber incidents impacting confidentiality, integrity, or availability of information assets, including those managed by third parties.

    Key Components

    • 11 core requirements spanning board accountability, role definitions, policy frameworks, asset classification, lifecycle controls, incident response, systematic testing, and internal audit assurance.
    • Built on CIA triad principles with commensurability to asset criticality/sensitivity.
    • No fixed control count; compliance via evidence-driven assurance, not certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for APRA-regulated entities (banks, insurers, super funds) to avoid penalties, heightened supervision.
    • Enhances operational resilience, stakeholder trust, third-party risk management.
    • Provides competitive edge through robust cyber posture and regulatory alignment.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, governance setup, asset classification, control deployment, testing programs.
    • Applies to all sizes in Australian financial sector; audits via internal/APRA review.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    GLBA
    Privacy notices, safeguards for NPI
    APRA CPS 234
    Information security capability, cyber resilience

    Industry

    GLBA
    US financial institutions, non-banks
    APRA CPS 234
    Australian regulated banks, insurers, super

    Nature

    GLBA
    Mandatory FTC rules for non-banks
    APRA CPS 234
    Mandatory prudential standard, board accountable

    Testing

    GLBA
    Penetration testing, vulnerability assessments
    APRA CPS 234
    Systematic independent testing, annual reviews

    Penalties

    GLBA
    $100k per violation, civil/criminal
    APRA CPS 234
    Supervisory actions, remediation directions

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about GLBA and APRA CPS 234

    GLBA FAQ

    APRA CPS 234 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages