GLBA
U.S. federal law for financial privacy and safeguards
BRC
Global standard for food safety in manufacturing
Quick Verdict
GLBA mandates privacy notices and security programs for financial institutions protecting NPI, while BRC is a voluntary certification ensuring food safety via HACCP and audits for manufacturers. Companies adopt GLBA for legal compliance, BRC for retailer market access.
GLBA
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA)
Key Features
- Requires initial and annual privacy notices
- Mandates comprehensive information security program
- Designates Qualified Individual for oversight
- Imposes annual board-level security reporting
- Triggers 30-day FTC breach notifications
BRC
BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety
Key Features
- HACCP-based food safety plan with hazard analysis
- Senior management commitment and culture plan
- Site standards and environmental monitoring
- GFSI-benchmarked third-party certification grading
- Strict scope rules and fundamental requirements
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
GLBA Details
What It Is
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) is a U.S. federal regulation enacted in 1999. It establishes privacy and security standards for financial institutions handling nonpublic personal information (NPI). Primary purpose: ensure transparency in data sharing and robust safeguards against unauthorized access. Adopts a risk-based approach via Privacy Rule and Safeguards Rule.
Key Components
- Privacy Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 313): notices, opt-outs for nonaffiliated sharing.
- Safeguards Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 314): written security program with administrative, technical, physical controls.
- **Pretexting provisionsanti-social engineering protections. Core: Qualified Individual designation, annual board reports, vendor oversight; no fixed control count, scalable by risk.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for broad financial entities; avoids FTC penalties up to $100,000/violation. Enhances risk management, customer trust, operational resilience. Builds competitive edge via proven data protection.
Implementation Overview
Phased: scoping, risk assessment, policy development, technical controls, testing. Applies to banks, non-banks like tax firms; FTC enforces. Requires audits, documentation; no certification but ongoing compliance evidence.
BRC Details
What It Is
BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety (Issue 9) is a GFSI-benchmarked certification framework for food manufacturers. It ensures product safety, legality, authenticity, and quality through a structured management system combining senior commitment, Codex HACCP, and prerequisite programs.
Key Components
- Nine core clauses: senior management, HACCP plan, FSQMS, site standards, product/process control, personnel, risk zones, traded products.
- Fundamental requirements (e.g., traceability, allergen management) critical for certification.
- Built on HACCP principles with grading (AA/A/B/C/D) via third-party audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets retailer mandates for supply chain access.
- Reduces recalls via risk controls (allergens, pathogens, labelling).
- Builds trust, demonstrates due diligence, aligns with FSMA.
- Drives continuous improvement through CAPA and culture plans.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, documentation, training, internal audits, certification audit.
- Applies to manufacturers globally; 6-12 months typical.
- Requires annual audits, unannounced options for higher grades. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | GLBA | BRC |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Consumer financial privacy and data security | Food manufacturing safety, quality, legality |
| Industry | Financial institutions (broad, non-banks included) | Food manufacturers, processors, packers |
| Nature | Mandatory US federal regulation with FTC enforcement | Voluntary GFSI-benchmarked certification standard |
| Testing | Risk assessments, penetration testing, board reporting | Annual on-site third-party audits, internal audits |
| Penalties | Civil penalties up to $100k/violation, imprisonment | Loss of certification, market access denial |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about GLBA and BRC
GLBA FAQ
BRC FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance
Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac
CMMC Scoping Mastery for Defense Supply Chains: Enclave Mapping, Subcontractor Flow-Down, and CUI Inventory Blueprint
Master CMMC scoping for DIB: delineate FCI/CUI boundaries, segment enclaves, manage subcontractor flow-down. Prevent 80% assessment failures with SSP templates,
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 Private Sector Tailoring Blueprint: First 5 Steps to Overlay-Driven Compliance with Infographic
Step-by-step blueprint for private sector NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 tailoring using overlays for AI & supply chain risks. Infographic + first 5 steps for ROI-drive
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
FedRAMP vs ITIL
Discover FedRAMP vs ITIL: FedRAMP's cloud security (12-36mo, NIST controls, $20M wins) vs ITIL 4's agile ITSM (34 practices). Optimize compliance now!
ISO 13485 vs AS9110C
Compare ISO 13485 vs AS9110C: Medical device QMS meets aerospace maintenance stds. Uncover risk mgmt, regulatory diffs & implementation tips for compliance. Boost your strategy now!
HITRUST CSF vs AS9120B
Compare HITRUST CSF vs AS9120B: cybersecurity assurance harmonizing 60+ standards vs aerospace QMS for traceability & counterfeit prevention. Unlock key differences now.