GMP
Regulatory framework ensuring consistent manufacturing quality standards
AS9120B
Aerospace QMS standard for parts distributors
Quick Verdict
GMP enforces manufacturing controls for pharma safety worldwide, preventing contamination via validation and oversight. AS9120B certifies aerospace distributors for traceability and counterfeit prevention. Companies adopt GMP for legal compliance, AS9120B for supply chain access.
GMP
Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP)
Key Features
- Requires preventive controls beyond final testing
- Independent quality unit approves product release
- Quality Risk Management ensures proportional controls
- Validated processes and equipment qualification mandatory
- Robust documentation for full traceability
AS9120B
AS9120B Quality Management Systems - Distributors
Key Features
- Counterfeit and unapproved parts prevention
- Traceability and chain-of-custody controls
- External provider evaluation and flowdown
- Configuration management for split lots
- Risk-based operational planning and preservation
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
GMP Details
What It Is
Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), also known as cGMP, is a regulatory framework establishing minimum standards for manufacturing controls in pharmaceuticals, biologics, and related products. Its primary purpose is ensuring products are consistently produced to meet quality, safety, and efficacy criteria through preventive systems spanning people, premises, processes, and documentation. It employs a risk-based approach via Quality Risk Management (QRM).
Key Components
- Core pillars: 5 Ps (People, Premises, Processes, Procedures, Products)
- Elements include quality management system (PQS), validation, independent Quality Control Unit, CAPA, change control, supplier oversight, and data integrity (ALCOA++)
- Built on ICH Q9/Q10, FDA 21 CFR Parts 210/211, EU EudraLex Volume 4, WHO GMP
- Compliance via inspections, no central certification but enforceable through audits
Why Organizations Use It
- Legal mandate prevents recalls, fines, market bans
- Reduces contamination/mix-up risks, ensures supply reliability
- Builds stakeholder trust, enables market access
- Drives efficiency, continual improvement
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, Validation Master Plan, training, qualification (IQ/OQ/PQ), audits
- Applies to pharma manufacturers globally; scales by size/risk
- Requires ongoing internal audits, regulatory inspections
AS9120B Details
What It Is
AS9120B is the IAQG's quality management system (QMS) standard for aerospace distributors, based on ISO 9001:2015's 10-clause structure. It targets organizations procuring, storing, splitting, and reselling parts without alteration, emphasizing risk-based thinking to mitigate supply chain risks like traceability loss and counterfeits.
Key Components
- Over 100 aerospace-specific requirements beyond ISO 9001.
- Core areas: context analysis, leadership, planning, support, operations (traceability, preservation, counterfeit prevention), performance evaluation, improvement.
- Built on PDCA cycle; requires documented information, internal audits, management reviews.
- Certification via accredited bodies, OASIS listing.
Why Organizations Use It
- Commercial necessity for OEM/Tier-1 approval.
- Reduces risks of nonconformities, counterfeits; enhances traceability.
- Builds customer trust, market access (2,442 global certifications).
- Improves efficiency, competitiveness in ASD supply chains.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, audits (6-12 months).
- Applies to distributors globally; scales by size.
- Involves risk registers, supplier controls, IT for traceability.
Key Differences
| Aspect | GMP | AS9120B |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Manufacturing controls for pharmaceuticals, facilities, processes, documentation | Distribution controls for aerospace parts, traceability, counterfeit prevention |
| Industry | Pharma, biologics, food, cosmetics globally | Aerospace distributors worldwide, aviation/space/defense |
| Nature | Enforceable regulations with inspections, warning letters | Voluntary certification standard based on ISO 9001 |
| Testing | Process validation, equipment qualification, stability testing | Internal audits, supplier verification, certification audits |
| Penalties | Recalls, fines, shutdowns, legal enforcement | Loss of certification, market exclusion, no legal fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about GMP and AS9120B
GMP FAQ
AS9120B FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365
Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence

SEC Cybersecurity Rules Materiality Determination Framework: Step-by-Step Guide with Checklists and Real-World Examples
Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 materiality determinations with our step-by-step framework, checklists, case law factors, and real-world examples. Avoid enforceme

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates
Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 45001 vs ISO 27017
ISO 45001 vs ISO 27017: Compare OH&S management vs cloud security controls. Uncover key clauses, shared HLS, leadership roles, and integration for compliance excellence.
FISMA vs Basel III
Compare FISMA vs Basel III: U.S. federal cybersecurity (NIST RMF) meets global bank capital/liquidity rules. Decode compliance, risks & strategies. Boost resilience today!
ISO 55001 vs C-TPAT
ISO 55001 vs C-TPAT: Compare asset management excellence with supply chain security standards. Optimize compliance, mitigate risks, boost efficiency. Discover key differences now!